Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
RBB vs BCAL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
RBB vs BCAL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $414M | $613M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $232M | $233M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $26M | $63M |
| Gross Margin | 45.2% | 79.4% |
| Operating Margin | 15.4% | 37.8% |
| Forward P/E | 10.5x | 11.4x |
| Total Debt | $364M | $72M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $258M | $52M |
RBB vs BCAL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| RBB Bancorp (RBB) | 100 | 189.4 | +89.4% |
| Southern California… (BCAL) | 100 | 217.7 | +117.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RBB vs BCAL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RBB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.98, yield 2.7%
- Lower P/E (10.5x vs 11.4x)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BCAL's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
BCAL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 26.2%, EPS growth 7.8%
- 133.3% 10Y total return vs RBB's 23.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.90, Low D/E 12.4%, current ratio 0.24x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.2% NII/revenue growth vs RBB's -1.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.5x vs 11.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BCAL's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.90 vs RBB's 0.98, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs BCAL's 0.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +58.3% vs BCAL's +32.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BCAL's 0.4% |
RBB vs BCAL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RBB vs BCAL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BCAL leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BCAL and RBB operate at a comparable scale, with $233M and $232M in trailing revenue. BCAL is the more profitable business, keeping 27.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RBB's 11.5%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $232M | $233M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $43M | $92M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $26M | $63M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $48M | $57M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.2% | +79.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.4% | +37.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | +27.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.9% | +24.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +51.3% | -2.0% |
Valuation Metrics
RBB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.9x trailing earnings, BCAL trades at a 40% valuation discount to RBB's 16.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BCAL's 7.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RBB's 11.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $414M | $613M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $520M | $632M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.53x | 9.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.47x | 11.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.31x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.58x | 7.19x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.79x | 2.63x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.87x | 1.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.18x | 10.76x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BCAL leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BCAL delivers a 11.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $5 for RBB. BCAL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RBB's 0.72x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BCAL scores 7/9 vs RBB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.1% | +11.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.6% | +1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.2% | +10.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.1% | +5.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.72x | 0.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $106M | $20M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $258M | $52M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $364M | $72M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.31x | 1.55x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RBB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BCAL five years ago would be worth $14,398 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,524 for RBB. Over the past 12 months, RBB leads with a +58.3% total return vs BCAL's +32.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RBB at 42.1% vs BCAL's 13.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +20.2% | +3.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +58.3% | +32.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +187.2% | +47.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.2% | +44.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.2% | +133.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +42.1% | +13.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RBB and BCAL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BCAL is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RBB's 0.98 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RBB currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs BCAL's 93.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.98x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.70 | $20.47 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.66 | $14.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.4% | +93.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.9 | 58.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 78K | 186K |
Analyst Outlook
RBB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates RBB as "Hold" and BCAL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.5% upside for BCAL (target: $22) vs -9.5% for RBB (target: $22). For income investors, RBB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.65% vs BCAL's 0.52%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.00 | $22.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.64 | $0.10 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.0% | +1.0% |
RBB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). BCAL leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
RBB vs BCAL: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RBB or BCAL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the stronger pick with 26.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 8% for RBB Bancorp (RBB). Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (11. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RBB or BCAL?
On trailing P/E, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the cheapest at 9.
9x versus RBB Bancorp at 16. 5x. On forward P/E, RBB Bancorp is actually cheaper at 10. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RBB or BCAL?
Over the past 5 years, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) delivered a total return of +44.
0%, compared to +25. 2% for RBB Bancorp (RBB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BCAL returned +133. 3% versus RBB's +23. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RBB or BCAL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
90β versus RBB Bancorp's 0. 98β — meaning RBB is approximately 10% more volatile than BCAL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 72% for RBB Bancorp — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RBB or BCAL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is pulling ahead at 26.
2% versus -1. 8% for RBB Bancorp (RBB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Southern California Bancorp grew EPS 777. 3% year-over-year, compared to -34. 4% for RBB Bancorp. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RBB or BCAL?
Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
1% net margin versus 11. 5% for RBB Bancorp — meaning it keeps 27. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BCAL leads at 37. 8% versus 15. 4% for RBB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BCAL leads at 79. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RBB or BCAL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, RBB Bancorp (RBB) trades at 10.
5x forward P/E versus 11. 4x for Southern California Bancorp — 0. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BCAL: 15. 5% to $22. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — RBB or BCAL?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
RBB Bancorp (RBB) offers the highest yield at 2. 7%, versus 0. 5% for Southern California Bancorp (BCAL).
09Is RBB or BCAL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
90), 0. 5% yield, +133. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BCAL: +133. 3%, RBB: +23. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RBB and BCAL?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RBB is a small-cap deep-value stock; BCAL is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.