REIT - Mortgage
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
RC vs GPMT vs TRTX vs ACRE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
RC vs GPMT vs TRTX vs ACRE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $357M | $74M | $656M | $280M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $499M | $132M | $264M | $55M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-229M | $-40M | $61M | $-20M |
| Gross Margin | -0.0% | 47.3% | 78.5% | 46.3% |
| Operating Margin | -50.5% | -4.3% | 51.0% | 44.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 8.1x | 16.3x |
| Total Debt | $5.86B | $1.17B | $3.29B | $1.05B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $248M | $66M | $88M | $29M |
RC vs GPMT vs TRTX vs ACRE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ready Capital Corpo… (RC) | 100 | 36.8 | -63.2% |
| Granite Point Mortg… (GPMT) | 100 | 31.5 | -68.5% |
| TPG RE Finance Trus… (TRTX) | 100 | 114.6 | +14.6% |
| Ares Commercial Rea… (ACRE) | 100 | 67.8 | -32.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RC vs GPMT vs TRTX vs ACRE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.17, yield 31.4%
- Rev growth 17.3%, EPS growth 45.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.2%
- Beta 1.17, yield 31.4%, current ratio 1.04x
- 17.3% FFO/revenue growth vs ACRE's -2.8%
GPMT plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
TRTX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.78, current ratio 0.18x
- Lower P/E (8.1x vs 16.3x)
- 23.2% margin vs RC's -45.8%
- Beta 0.78 vs GPMT's 1.44
ACRE is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 43.3% 10Y total return vs TRTX's -1.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.3% FFO/revenue growth vs ACRE's -2.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.1x vs 16.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.2% margin vs RC's -45.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.78 vs GPMT's 1.44 | |
| Dividends | 31.4% yield, vs TRTX's 13.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +25.7% vs RC's -44.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.4% ROA vs RC's -2.6%, ROIC 4.7% vs 1.2% |
RC vs GPMT vs TRTX vs ACRE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
RC vs GPMT vs TRTX vs ACRE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TRTX leads in 5 of 6 categories
RC leads 0 • GPMT leads 0 • ACRE leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRTX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RC is the larger business by revenue, generating $499M annually — 9.1x ACRE's $55M. TRTX is the more profitable business, keeping 23.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RC's -45.8%. On growth, RC holds the edge at +8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $499M | $132M | $264M | $55M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$249M | -$8M | $144M | $31M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$229M | -$40M | $61M | -$20M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $303M | $463,000 | $96M | -$44M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -0.0% | +47.3% | +78.5% | +46.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -50.5% | -4.3% | +51.0% | +44.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -45.8% | -30.5% | +23.2% | -36.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +60.6% | +0.4% | +36.4% | -80.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.7% | +157.8% | -4.4% | -10.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.9% | +40.9% | +58.3% | -2.0% |
Valuation Metrics
TRTX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, TRTX's 15.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RC's 48.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $357M | $74M | $656M | $280M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.0B | $1.2B | $3.9B | $1.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.50x | -1.34x | 14.89x | -307.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 8.09x | 16.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 48.25x | 20.75x | 15.10x | 18.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.71x | 0.51x | 1.97x | 3.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.22x | 0.13x | 0.63x | 0.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 27.85x | 7.26x | 14.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TRTX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRTX delivers a 5.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-12 for RC. ACRE carries lower financial leverage with a 2.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RC's 3.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GPMT scores 6/9 vs ACRE's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.2% | -7.1% | +5.7% | -3.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.6% | -2.3% | +1.4% | -1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.2% | +2.6% | +4.7% | +2.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.4% | +4.6% | +7.1% | +5.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.55x | 2.12x | 3.08x | 2.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.6B | $1.1B | $3.2B | $1.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $248M | $66M | $88M | $29M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.9B | $1.2B | $3.3B | $1.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.41x | 0.58x | 1.32x | 0.95x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRTX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRTX five years ago would be worth $10,145 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,472 for GPMT. Over the past 12 months, TRTX leads with a +25.7% total return vs RC's -44.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRTX at 26.7% vs RC's -23.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.4% | -32.5% | -1.0% | +9.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -44.9% | -19.7% | +25.7% | +20.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.4% | -34.3% | +103.4% | -4.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.4% | -65.3% | +1.4% | -29.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.1% | -50.0% | -1.9% | +43.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -23.1% | -13.1% | +26.7% | -1.5% |
Risk & Volatility
TRTX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TRTX is the less volatile stock with a 0.78 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GPMT's 1.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRTX currently trades 86.2% from its 52-week high vs RC's 45.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.17x | 1.44x | 0.78x | 0.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.75 | $3.12 | $9.85 | $5.89 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.51 | $1.24 | $7.44 | $4.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +45.5% | +49.7% | +86.2% | +85.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.1 | 49.4 | 60.6 | 53.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.1M | 154K | 655K | 396K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — RC and TRTX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RC as "Buy", GPMT as "Hold", TRTX as "Buy", ACRE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 61.3% upside for GPMT (target: $3) vs -1.0% for ACRE (target: $5). For income investors, RC offers the higher dividend yield at 31.37% vs TRTX's 13.50%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.50 | $2.50 | $10.00 | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 12 | 11 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +31.4% | +14.0% | +13.5% | +14.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.68 | $0.22 | $1.15 | $0.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +18.9% | +7.6% | +3.9% | 0.0% |
TRTX leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
RC vs GPMT vs TRTX vs ACRE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RC or GPMT or TRTX or ACRE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ready Capital Corporation (RC) is the stronger pick with 1726% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2.
8% for Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation (ACRE). TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc. (TRTX) offers the better valuation at 14. 9x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ready Capital Corporation (RC) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RC or GPMT or TRTX or ACRE?
On forward P/E, TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 8. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RC or GPMT or TRTX or ACRE?
Over the past 5 years, TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc.
(TRTX) delivered a total return of +1. 4%, compared to -65. 3% for Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. (GPMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACRE returned +43. 3% versus GPMT's -50. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RC or GPMT or TRTX or ACRE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc.
(TRTX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 78β versus Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. 's 1. 44β — meaning GPMT is approximately 84% more volatile than TRTX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation (ACRE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 4% for Ready Capital Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RC or GPMT or TRTX or ACRE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ready Capital Corporation (RC) is pulling ahead at 1726% versus -2.
8% for Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation (ACRE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation grew EPS 97. 4% year-over-year, compared to -26. 0% for TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GPMT leads at 22. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RC or GPMT or TRTX or ACRE?
TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc.
(TRTX) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 1% net margin versus -45. 8% for Ready Capital Corporation — meaning it keeps 18. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRTX leads at 73. 0% versus 24. 2% for RC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RC leads at 87. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RC or GPMT or TRTX or ACRE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc.
(TRTX) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 16. 3x for Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation — 8. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GPMT: 61. 3% to $2. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — RC or GPMT or TRTX or ACRE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Ready Capital Corporation (RC) offers the highest yield at 31. 4%, versus 13. 5% for TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc. (TRTX).
09Is RC or GPMT or TRTX or ACRE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc.
(TRTX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 78), 13. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRTX: -1. 9%, GPMT: -50. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RC and GPMT and TRTX and ACRE?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RC is a small-cap high-growth stock; GPMT is a small-cap high-growth stock; TRTX is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACRE is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.