REIT - Mortgage
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
RC vs KREF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Mortgage
RC vs KREF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $357M | $423M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $499M | $442M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-229M | $-104M |
| Gross Margin | -0.0% | 87.1% |
| Operating Margin | -50.5% | 48.0% |
| Total Debt | $5.86B | $4.69B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $248M | $85M |
RC vs KREF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ready Capital Corpo… (RC) | 100 | 32.2 | -67.8% |
| KKR Real Estate Fin… (KREF) | 100 | 40.8 | -59.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RC vs KREF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.17, yield 31.4%
- Rev growth 17.3%, EPS growth 45.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.2%
- 6.1% 10Y total return vs KREF's -9.1%
KREF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and stability.
- -23.6% margin vs RC's -45.8%
- Beta 0.87 vs RC's 1.17
- -16.9% vs RC's -44.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.3% FFO/revenue growth vs KREF's -22.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | -23.6% margin vs RC's -45.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs RC's 1.17 | |
| Dividends | 31.4% yield, vs KREF's 15.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -16.9% vs RC's -44.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -1.6% ROA vs RC's -2.6%, ROIC 3.4% vs 1.2% |
RC vs KREF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — RC and KREF each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RC and KREF operate at a comparable scale, with $499M and $442M in trailing revenue. KREF is the more profitable business, keeping -23.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RC's -45.8%. On growth, RC holds the edge at +8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $499M | $442M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$249M | $140M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$229M | -$104M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $303M | $65M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -0.0% | +87.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -50.5% | +48.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -45.8% | -23.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +60.6% | +14.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.7% | -13.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.9% | -5.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — RC and KREF each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, KREF's 18.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RC's 48.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $357M | $423M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.0B | $5.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.50x | -6.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 48.25x | 18.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.71x | 0.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.22x | 0.36x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 6.34x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KREF leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KREF delivers a -8.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-8 in annual profit, vs $-12 for RC. RC carries lower financial leverage with a 3.55x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KREF's 3.83x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RC scores 5/9 vs KREF's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.2% | -8.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.6% | -1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.2% | +3.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.4% | +4.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.55x | 3.83x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.6B | $4.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $248M | $85M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.9B | $4.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.41x | 0.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KREF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KREF five years ago would be worth $6,436 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,564 for RC. Over the past 12 months, KREF leads with a -16.9% total return vs RC's -44.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KREF at -0.2% vs RC's -23.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.4% | -17.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -44.9% | -16.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.4% | -0.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.4% | -35.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.1% | -9.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -23.1% | -0.2% |
Risk & Volatility
KREF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KREF is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RC's 1.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KREF currently trades 65.9% from its 52-week high vs RC's 45.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.15x | 0.86x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.75 | $9.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.51 | $5.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +45.5% | +65.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.1 | 54.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.1M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
RC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates RC as "Buy" and KREF as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.7% upside for RC (target: $3) vs 6.4% for KREF (target: $7). For income investors, RC offers the higher dividend yield at 31.37% vs KREF's 15.21%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.50 | $7.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +31.4% | +15.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.68 | $1.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +18.9% | +10.3% |
KREF leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). RC leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
RC vs KREF: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RC or KREF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ready Capital Corporation (RC) is the stronger pick with 1726% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22.
7% for KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. (KREF). Analysts rate Ready Capital Corporation (RC) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — RC or KREF?
Over the past 5 years, KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc.
(KREF) delivered a total return of -35. 6%, compared to -44. 4% for Ready Capital Corporation (RC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RC returned +4. 2% versus KREF's -9. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — RC or KREF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc.
(KREF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 86β versus Ready Capital Corporation's 1. 15β — meaning RC is approximately 34% more volatile than KREF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ready Capital Corporation (RC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 4% for KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — RC or KREF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ready Capital Corporation (RC) is pulling ahead at 1726% versus -22.
7% for KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. (KREF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ready Capital Corporation grew EPS 45. 2% year-over-year, compared to -652. 6% for KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RC leads at 9. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — RC or KREF?
KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc.
(KREF) is the more profitable company, earning -10. 3% net margin versus -45. 8% for Ready Capital Corporation — meaning it keeps -10. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KREF leads at 59. 3% versus 24. 2% for RC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KREF leads at 88. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — RC or KREF?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Ready Capital Corporation (RC) offers the highest yield at 31. 4%, versus 15. 2% for KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. (KREF).
07Is RC or KREF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc.
(KREF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 86), 15. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KREF: -9. 0%, RC: +4. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between RC and KREF?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RC is a small-cap high-growth stock; KREF is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.