Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RCEL vs DBVT vs ALKS vs XTNT vs NVCR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Devices
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
RCEL vs DBVT vs ALKS vs XTNT vs NVCR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $128M | $1712.35T | $5.90B | $80M | $1.92B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $72M | $0.00 | $1.56B | $133M | $674M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-49M | $-168M | $153M | $2M | $-173M |
| Gross Margin | 82.1% | — | 65.4% | 62.0% | 75.2% |
| Operating Margin | 89.0% | — | 12.3% | 4.8% | -27.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 24.8x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $2M | $22M | $70M | $35M | $290M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $194M | $1.12B | $6M | $103M |
RCEL vs DBVT vs ALKS vs XTNT vs NVCR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVITA Medical, Inc. (RCEL) | 100 | 12.8 | -87.2% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 40.7 | -59.3% |
| Alkermes plc (ALKS) | 100 | 213.9 | +113.9% |
| Xtant Medical Holdi… (XTNT) | 100 | 42.3 | -57.7% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 26.5 | -73.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RCEL vs DBVT vs ALKS vs XTNT vs NVCR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RCEL lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
DBVT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.26
- +110.4% vs RCEL's -55.9%
ALKS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- -11.0% 10Y total return vs NVCR's 30.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.06, Low D/E 3.8%, current ratio 3.55x
- Beta 1.06, current ratio 3.55x
- 9.8% margin vs RCEL's -67.8%
XTNT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 28.4%, EPS growth 107.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.5%
- 28.4% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
- Beta 0.69 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage
Among these 5 stocks, NVCR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.4% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.8% margin vs RCEL's -67.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.69 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +110.4% vs RCEL's -55.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.4% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
RCEL vs DBVT vs ALKS vs XTNT vs NVCR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
RCEL vs DBVT vs ALKS vs XTNT vs NVCR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ALKS leads in 2 of 6 categories
DBVT leads 1 • RCEL leads 0 • XTNT leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALKS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALKS and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $1.6B and $0 in trailing revenue. ALKS is the more profitable business, keeping 9.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RCEL's -67.8%. On growth, ALKS holds the edge at +28.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $72M | $0 | $1.6B | $133M | $674M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $64M | -$112M | $212M | $11M | -$165M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$49M | -$168M | $153M | $2M | -$173M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$31M | -$151M | $392M | $5M | -$48M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +82.1% | — | +65.4% | +62.0% | +75.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +89.0% | — | +12.3% | +4.8% | -27.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -67.8% | — | +9.8% | +1.3% | -25.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -43.6% | — | +25.1% | +3.9% | -7.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.3% | — | +28.2% | +19.0% | +12.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.9% | +91.5% | -4.1% | +123.7% | -100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — RCEL and DBVT and XTNT and NVCR each lead in 1 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, RCEL's 1.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALKS's 17.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $128M | $1712.35T | $5.9B | $80M | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $120M | $1712.35T | $4.9B | $109M | $2.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.40x | -0.76x | 24.76x | -4.75x | -13.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.88x | — | 17.25x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.78x | — | 4.00x | 0.68x | 2.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.66x | 3.28x | 1.77x | 5.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 12.28x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKS delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. ALKS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVCR's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALKS scores 7/9 vs XTNT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -130.2% | +8.8% | +3.8% | -50.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -86.2% | -89.0% | +5.4% | +1.8% | -16.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.2% | — | +18.9% | -12.8% | -16.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.4% | -145.7% | +14.2% | -17.9% | -28.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.13x | 0.04x | 0.82x | 0.85x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | -$172M | -$1.0B | $29M | $187M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $194M | $1.1B | $6M | $103M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $22M | $70M | $35M | $290M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -189.82x | 32.30x | 1.55x | -96.80x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DBVT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALKS five years ago would be worth $16,091 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $875 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +110.4% total return vs RCEL's -55.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DBVT at 6.2% vs NVCR's -37.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +20.3% | +4.9% | +25.3% | -24.0% | +28.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -55.9% | +110.4% | +16.5% | +10.0% | +1.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.0% | +19.7% | +14.5% | -12.3% | -75.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.3% | -69.1% | +60.9% | -66.1% | -91.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.9% | -87.0% | -11.0% | -97.8% | +30.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -36.1% | +6.2% | +4.6% | -4.3% | -37.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ALKS and XTNT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XTNT is the less volatile stock with a 0.69 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALKS currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs RCEL's 42.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.89x | 1.26x | 1.00x | 0.67x | 2.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.85 | $26.18 | $36.60 | $0.95 | $20.06 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.22 | $7.53 | $25.17 | $0.44 | $9.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +42.4% | +76.3% | +96.7% | +60.0% | +83.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.3 | 48.1 | 60.2 | 60.9 | 69.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 204K | 252K | 2.3M | 142K | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RCEL as "Buy", DBVT as "Buy", ALKS as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 131.8% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs 29.9% for ALKS (target: $46).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.75 | $46.33 | $46.00 | — | $33.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 15 | 28 | — | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ALKS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DBVT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
RCEL vs DBVT vs ALKS vs XTNT vs NVCR: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RCEL or DBVT or ALKS or XTNT or NVCR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Xtant Medical Holdings, Inc.
(XTNT) is the stronger pick with 28. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). Alkermes plc (ALKS) offers the better valuation at 24. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AVITA Medical, Inc. (RCEL) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — RCEL or DBVT or ALKS or XTNT or NVCR?
Over the past 5 years, Alkermes plc (ALKS) delivered a total return of +60.
9%, compared to -91. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVCR returned +38. 5% versus XTNT's -98. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — RCEL or DBVT or ALKS or XTNT or NVCR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Xtant Medical Holdings, Inc.
(XTNT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 67β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 15β — meaning NVCR is approximately 219% more volatile than XTNT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alkermes plc (ALKS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 85% for NovoCure Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — RCEL or DBVT or ALKS or XTNT or NVCR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Xtant Medical Holdings, Inc.
(XTNT) is pulling ahead at 28. 4% versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AVITA Medical, Inc. grew EPS 27. 2% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, XTNT leads at 28. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — RCEL or DBVT or ALKS or XTNT or NVCR?
Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
4% net margin versus -67. 8% for AVITA Medical, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RCEL leads at 89. 0% versus -23. 5% for NVCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALKS leads at 86. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — RCEL or DBVT or ALKS or XTNT or NVCR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is RCEL or DBVT or ALKS or XTNT or NVCR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Xtant Medical Holdings, Inc.
(XTNT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 67)). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (XTNT: -98. 0%, NVCR: +38. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between RCEL and DBVT and ALKS and XTNT and NVCR?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RCEL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; ALKS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; XTNT is a small-cap high-growth stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.