Conglomerates
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
RCMT vs HSII
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Staffing & Employment Services
RCMT vs HSII — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Conglomerates | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | $204M | $1.23B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $319M | $1.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $16M | $37M |
| Gross Margin | 27.2% | 23.3% |
| Operating Margin | 7.9% | 3.0% |
| Forward P/E | 12.4x | 16.7x |
| Total Debt | $26M | $101M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $516M |
RCMT vs HSII — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| RCM Technologies, I… (RCMT) | 100 | 2150.7 | +2050.7% |
| Heidrick & Struggle… (HSII) | 100 | 265.4 | +165.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RCMT vs HSII
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RCMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.18
- Rev growth 14.7%, EPS growth 28.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.9%
- 471.3% 10Y total return vs HSII's 240.0%
HSII is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.77, Low D/E 22.3%, current ratio 1.60x
- Beta 0.77, yield 1.0%, current ratio 1.60x
- Beta 0.77 vs RCMT's 1.18, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.7% revenue growth vs HSII's 7.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.4x vs 16.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.1% margin vs HSII's 3.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.77 vs RCMT's 1.18, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.9% vs RCMT's +38.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.5% ROA vs HSII's 2.9%, ROIC 26.9% vs 6.0% |
RCMT vs HSII — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RCMT vs HSII — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RCMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HSII is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 3.8x RCMT's $319M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 5.1% (RCMT) to 3.1% (HSII).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $319M | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $27M | $57M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $16M | $37M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $17M | $132M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.2% | +23.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.9% | +3.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.1% | +3.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.4% | +10.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.4% | +14.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +116.2% | +16.9% |
Valuation Metrics
RCMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.4x trailing earnings, RCMT trades at a 91% valuation discount to HSII's 143.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RCMT's 8.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HSII's 30.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $204M | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $227M | $812M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.40x | 143.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.45x | 16.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.06x | 30.78x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.64x | 1.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.77x | 2.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.76x | 9.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RCMT leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RCMT delivers a 40.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $7 for HSII. HSII carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RCMT's 0.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RCMT scores 8/9 vs HSII's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +40.9% | +7.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.5% | +2.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +26.9% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +31.6% | +1.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.56x | 0.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $23M | -$415M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $516M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $26M | $101M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.05x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HSII leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RCMT five years ago would be worth $83,295 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,738 for HSII. Over the past 12 months, HSII leads with a +39.9% total return vs RCMT's +38.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HSII at 34.9% vs RCMT's 33.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +45.1% | — |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +38.7% | +39.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +136.0% | +145.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +732.9% | +47.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +471.3% | +240.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +33.1% | +34.9% |
Risk & Volatility
HSII leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HSII is the less volatile stock with a 0.77 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCMT's 1.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HSII currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs RCMT's 88.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.18x | 0.77x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.50 | $59.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.26 | $40.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.7% | +99.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.5 | 77.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 67K | 0 |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates RCMT as "Buy" and HSII as "Hold". HSII is the only dividend payer here at 1.03% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $59.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.61 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.6% | +0.3% |
RCMT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). HSII leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
RCMT vs HSII: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RCMT or HSII a better buy right now?
For growth investors, RCM Technologies, Inc.
(RCMT) is the stronger pick with 14. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 2% for Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. (HSII). RCM Technologies, Inc. (RCMT) offers the better valuation at 13. 4x trailing P/E (12. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate RCM Technologies, Inc. (RCMT) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RCMT or HSII?
On trailing P/E, RCM Technologies, Inc.
(RCMT) is the cheapest at 13. 4x versus Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. at 143. 9x. On forward P/E, RCM Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RCMT or HSII?
Over the past 5 years, RCM Technologies, Inc.
(RCMT) delivered a total return of +732. 9%, compared to +47. 4% for Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. (HSII). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RCMT returned +471. 3% versus HSII's +240. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RCMT or HSII?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc.
(HSII) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 77β versus RCM Technologies, Inc. 's 1. 18β — meaning RCMT is approximately 53% more volatile than HSII relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. (HSII) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 56% for RCM Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RCMT or HSII?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), RCM Technologies, Inc.
(RCMT) is pulling ahead at 14. 7% versus 7. 2% for Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. (HSII). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RCM Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 28. 0% year-over-year, compared to -84. 4% for Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCMT leads at 3. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RCMT or HSII?
RCM Technologies, Inc.
(RCMT) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 1% net margin versus 0. 8% for Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RCMT leads at 7. 9% versus 0. 7% for HSII. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCMT leads at 26. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RCMT or HSII more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, RCM Technologies, Inc.
(RCMT) trades at 12. 4x forward P/E versus 16. 7x for Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. — 4. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — RCMT or HSII?
In this comparison, HSII (1.
0% yield) pays a dividend. RCMT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RCMT or HSII better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc.
(HSII) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 77), 1. 0% yield, +240. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HSII: +240. 0%, RCMT: +471. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RCMT and HSII?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RCMT is a small-cap deep-value stock; HSII is a small-cap quality compounder stock. HSII pays a dividend while RCMT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.