Industrial - Distribution
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
RECT vs GFAI vs BCO vs CLPS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Security & Protection Services
Security & Protection Services
Information Technology Services
RECT vs GFAI vs BCO vs CLPS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Distribution | Security & Protection Services | Security & Protection Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $20M | $10M | $4.44B | $25M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $72M | $72M | $5.39B | $299M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $-24M | $180M | $-4M |
| Gross Margin | 32.3% | 15.1% | 26.1% | 22.8% |
| Operating Margin | 8.5% | -27.4% | 10.7% | -1.4% |
| Forward P/E | 11.1x | — | 11.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $9M | $3M | $4.93B | $34M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $22M | $2.27B | $28M |
RECT vs GFAI vs BCO vs CLPS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rectitude Holdings … (RECT) | 100 | 43.1 | -56.9% |
| Guardforce AI Co., … (GFAI) | 100 | 21.5 | -78.5% |
| The Brink's Company (BCO) | 100 | 105.2 | +5.2% |
| CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) | 100 | 102.8 | +2.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RECT vs GFAI vs BCO vs CLPS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RECT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 5.9%, EPS growth -40.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, Low D/E 35.1%, current ratio 2.26x
- Better valuation composite
- 6.5% margin vs GFAI's -32.9%
GFAI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
BCO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 293.0% 10Y total return vs RECT's -64.1%
- 0.9% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs CLPS's 14.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- +19.4% vs RECT's -69.0%
CLPS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 14.6%
- Beta 0.27, yield 14.6%, current ratio 1.58x
- 15.2% revenue growth vs GFAI's 0.2%
- Beta 0.27 vs GFAI's 2.31
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.2% revenue growth vs GFAI's 0.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.5% margin vs GFAI's -32.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs GFAI's 2.31 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs CLPS's 14.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.4% vs RECT's -69.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.1% ROA vs GFAI's -50.2%, ROIC 8.3% vs -41.6% |
RECT vs GFAI vs BCO vs CLPS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
RECT vs GFAI vs BCO vs CLPS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RECT leads in 1 of 6 categories
CLPS leads 1 • BCO leads 1 • GFAI leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RECT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BCO is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.4B annually — 74.6x RECT's $72M. RECT is the more profitable business, keeping 6.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GFAI's -32.9%. On growth, RECT holds the edge at +44.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $72M | $72M | $5.4B | $299M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8M | -$12M | $797M | -$1M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | -$24M | $180M | -$4M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | -$6M | $544M | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.3% | +15.1% | +26.1% | +22.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.5% | -27.4% | +10.7% | -1.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.5% | -32.9% | +3.3% | -1.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | -8.8% | +10.1% | -2.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +44.7% | +3.6% | +10.3% | +15.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -25.9% | +38.9% | -35.3% | +75.8% |
Valuation Metrics
CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.1x trailing earnings, RECT trades at a 52% valuation discount to BCO's 22.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RECT's 6.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BCO's 8.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $20M | $10M | $4.4B | $25M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $22M | -$9M | $7.1B | $31M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.09x | -0.89x | 22.93x | -3.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 11.73x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.38x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.71x | — | 8.01x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.59x | 0.28x | 0.84x | 0.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.98x | 0.16x | 11.14x | 0.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 10.17x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — GFAI and BCO each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BCO delivers a 45.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $46 in annual profit, vs $-70 for GFAI. GFAI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BCO's 12.10x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GFAI scores 6/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.1% | -69.7% | +45.6% | -6.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.1% | -50.2% | +2.5% | -3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.3% | -41.6% | +14.3% | -7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.4% | -19.1% | +12.1% | -9.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.35x | 0.08x | 12.10x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | -$19M | $2.7B | $6M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $22M | $2.3B | $28M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $3M | $4.9B | $34M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 23.10x | -167.24x | 3.90x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BCO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BCO five years ago would be worth $13,932 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $46 for GFAI. Over the past 12 months, BCO leads with a +19.4% total return vs RECT's -69.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BCO at 20.6% vs GFAI's -60.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -22.2% | -26.3% | -7.3% | -10.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -69.0% | -53.2% | +19.4% | -5.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.1% | -93.8% | +75.3% | +0.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.1% | -99.5% | +39.3% | -69.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.1% | -99.5% | +293.0% | -78.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -28.9% | -60.4% | +20.6% | +0.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BCO and CLPS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CLPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GFAI's 2.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BCO currently trades 79.0% from its 52-week high vs RECT's 28.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.53x | 2.31x | 1.10x | 0.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.00 | $1.50 | $136.37 | $1.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.00 | $0.38 | $80.10 | $0.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +28.0% | +31.5% | +79.0% | +48.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.7 | 47.0 | 52.0 | 49.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.6M | 378K | 543K | 15K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BCO and CLPS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, CLPS offers the higher dividend yield at 14.60% vs BCO's 0.93%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $163.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 9 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.9% | +14.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | — | 6 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.00 | $0.13 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.7% | 0.0% |
RECT leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). CLPS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
RECT vs GFAI vs BCO vs CLPS: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RECT or GFAI or BCO or CLPS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger pick with 15.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 2% for Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI). Rectitude Holdings Ltd Ordinary Shares (RECT) offers the better valuation at 11. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Brink's Company (BCO) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RECT or GFAI or BCO or CLPS?
On trailing P/E, Rectitude Holdings Ltd Ordinary Shares (RECT) is the cheapest at 11.
1x versus The Brink's Company at 22. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RECT or GFAI or BCO or CLPS?
Over the past 5 years, The Brink's Company (BCO) delivered a total return of +39.
3%, compared to -99. 5% for Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BCO returned +293. 0% versus GFAI's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RECT or GFAI or BCO or CLPS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
27β versus Guardforce AI Co. , Limited's 2. 31β — meaning GFAI is approximately 751% more volatile than CLPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 12% for The Brink's Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RECT or GFAI or BCO or CLPS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is pulling ahead at 15.
2% versus 0. 2% for Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Guardforce AI Co. , Limited grew EPS 88. 3% year-over-year, compared to -181. 4% for CLPS Incorporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, RECT leads at 13. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RECT or GFAI or BCO or CLPS?
Rectitude Holdings Ltd Ordinary Shares (RECT) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
1% net margin versus -16. 1% for Guardforce AI Co. , Limited — meaning it keeps 5. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BCO leads at 11. 3% versus -18. 5% for GFAI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RECT leads at 33. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — RECT or GFAI or BCO or CLPS?
In this comparison, CLPS (14.
6% yield), BCO (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. RECT, GFAI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is RECT or GFAI or BCO or CLPS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
27), 14. 6% yield). Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI) carries a higher beta of 2. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLPS: -78. 5%, GFAI: -99. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between RECT and GFAI and BCO and CLPS?
These companies operate in different sectors (RECT (Industrials) and GFAI (Industrials) and BCO (Industrials) and CLPS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RECT is a small-cap deep-value stock; GFAI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BCO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock. BCO, CLPS pay a dividend while RECT, GFAI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.