Agricultural - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
REVG vs WNC vs PCAR vs ALSN vs OSK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural - Machinery
Agricultural - Machinery
Auto - Parts
Agricultural - Machinery
REVG vs WNC vs PCAR vs ALSN vs OSK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery | Auto - Parts | Agricultural - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $3.12B | $317M | $60.02B | $10.23B | $9.70B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.40B | $1.47B | $27.24B | $3.65B | $10.80B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $108M | $-65M | $2.48B | $543M | $731M |
| Gross Margin | 14.4% | 2.0% | 15.1% | 40.8% | 17.5% |
| Operating Margin | 7.1% | -3.1% | 9.7% | 24.1% | 9.5% |
| Forward P/E | 17.2x | 1.5x | 19.9x | 13.6x | 13.7x |
| Total Debt | $56M | $443M | $0.00 | $2.92B | $1.10B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $35M | $32M | $9.25B | $1.50B | $480M |
REVG vs WNC vs PCAR vs ALSN vs OSK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Jan 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| REV Group, Inc. (REVG) | 100 | 1047.5 | +947.5% |
| Wabash National Cor… (WNC) | 100 | 106.1 | +6.1% |
| PACCAR Inc (PCAR) | 100 | 249.6 | +149.6% |
| Allison Transmissio… (ALSN) | 100 | 288.2 | +188.2% |
| Oshkosh Corporation (OSK) | 100 | 200.3 | +100.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: REVG vs WNC vs PCAR vs ALSN vs OSK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
REVG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and momentum.
- 3.5% revenue growth vs WNC's -20.8%
- +80.3% vs WNC's +0.4%
- 8.9% ROA vs WNC's -5.0%, ROIC 29.9% vs 37.4%
WNC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (1.5x vs 19.9x)
- 4.2% yield, vs OSK's 0.2%
PCAR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.
- Beta 1.01, yield 3.8%, current ratio 1.70x
- Beta 1.01 vs WNC's 1.93
ALSN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 1.11, yield 0.9%
- 373.8% 10Y total return vs PCAR's 269.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.11, current ratio 4.85x
- PEG 0.60 vs OSK's 2.86
OSK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -2.9%, EPS growth -3.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.5% revenue growth vs WNC's -20.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.5x vs 19.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.9% margin vs WNC's -4.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.01 vs WNC's 1.93 | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, vs OSK's 0.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +80.3% vs WNC's +0.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.9% ROA vs WNC's -5.0%, ROIC 29.9% vs 37.4% |
REVG vs WNC vs PCAR vs ALSN vs OSK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
REVG vs WNC vs PCAR vs ALSN vs OSK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ALSN leads in 1 of 6 categories
WNC leads 1 • REVG leads 1 • PCAR leads 0 • OSK leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALSN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PCAR is the larger business by revenue, generating $27.2B annually — 18.6x WNC's $1.5B. ALSN is the more profitable business, keeping 14.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WNC's -4.4%. On growth, ALSN holds the edge at +83.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.4B | $1.5B | $27.2B | $3.6B | $10.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $193M | -$2M | $3.3B | $970M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $108M | -$65M | $2.5B | $543M | $731M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $200M | -$38M | $3.4B | $713M | $1.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.4% | +2.0% | +15.1% | +40.8% | +17.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | -3.1% | +9.7% | +24.1% | +9.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.5% | -4.4% | +9.1% | +14.9% | +6.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.3% | -2.6% | +12.5% | +19.5% | +13.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.3% | -20.4% | -16.2% | +83.6% | +3.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +68.6% | -120.7% | +19.8% | -40.4% | -9.9% |
Valuation Metrics
WNC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.5x trailing earnings, WNC trades at a 95% valuation discount to REVG's 33.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ALSN offers better value at 0.73x vs OSK's 3.19x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.1B | $317M | $60.0B | $10.2B | $9.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $728M | $50.8B | $11.7B | $10.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 33.81x | 1.54x | 25.29x | 16.79x | 15.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.18x | — | 19.90x | 13.60x | 13.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.00x | 0.73x | 3.19x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.35x | 1.92x | 13.40x | 10.63x | 8.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.27x | 0.21x | 2.11x | 3.40x | 0.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.73x | 0.88x | 3.12x | 5.60x | 12.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.41x | — | 19.81x | 15.77x | 15.70x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — REVG and PCAR each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALSN delivers a 29.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $-17 for WNC. REVG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALSN's 1.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), REVG scores 7/9 vs PCAR's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +27.9% | -17.3% | +17.2% | +29.5% | +16.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.9% | -5.0% | +6.6% | +8.4% | +7.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +29.9% | +37.4% | +12.2% | +22.2% | +14.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +27.0% | +32.6% | +8.9% | +18.6% | +13.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 1.20x | — | 1.56x | 0.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $21M | $411M | -$9.3B | $1.4B | $621M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $35M | $32M | $9.3B | $1.5B | $480M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $56M | $443M | $0 | $2.9B | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.03x | -0.97x | 129.28x | 64.20x | 8.69x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
REVG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in REVG five years ago would be worth $36,117 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,154 for WNC. Over the past 12 months, REVG leads with a +80.3% total return vs WNC's +0.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors REVG at 85.2% vs WNC's -28.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.6% | -11.0% | +2.5% | +24.7% | +16.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +80.3% | +0.4% | +31.6% | +27.7% | +75.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +535.6% | -63.9% | +71.7% | +162.2% | +109.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +261.2% | -48.5% | +105.3% | +183.5% | +20.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +174.2% | -22.6% | +269.8% | +373.8% | +268.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +85.2% | -28.8% | +19.7% | +37.9% | +27.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — REVG and PCAR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PCAR is the less volatile stock with a 1.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WNC's 1.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. REVG currently trades 91.4% from its 52-week high vs WNC's 60.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 1.93x | 1.01x | 1.11x | 1.49x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $69.92 | $12.94 | $131.88 | $137.42 | $180.49 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $34.96 | $7.10 | $88.43 | $76.01 | $87.70 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.4% | +60.3% | +86.5% | +89.6% | +85.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.6 | 37.7 | 41.6 | 50.9 | 56.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 598K | 2.7M | 814K | 581K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WNC and OSK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: REVG as "Hold", WNC as "Hold", PCAR as "Hold", ALSN as "Hold", OSK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 124.4% upside for WNC (target: $18) vs -13.9% for REVG (target: $55). For income investors, WNC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.23% vs OSK's 0.23%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $55.00 | $17.50 | $124.50 | $116.00 | $168.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 18 | 45 | 29 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | +4.2% | +3.8% | +0.9% | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.26 | $0.33 | $4.30 | $1.07 | $0.35 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.5% | +10.6% | +0.1% | +3.2% | +2.9% |
ALSN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). WNC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
REVG vs WNC vs PCAR vs ALSN vs OSK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is REVG or WNC or PCAR or ALSN or OSK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, REV Group, Inc.
(REVG) is the stronger pick with 3. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -20. 8% for Wabash National Corporation (WNC). Wabash National Corporation (WNC) offers the better valuation at 1. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Oshkosh Corporation (OSK) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — REVG or WNC or PCAR or ALSN or OSK?
On trailing P/E, Wabash National Corporation (WNC) is the cheapest at 1.
5x versus REV Group, Inc. at 33. 8x. On forward P/E, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 60x versus Oshkosh Corporation's 2. 86x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — REVG or WNC or PCAR or ALSN or OSK?
Over the past 5 years, REV Group, Inc.
(REVG) delivered a total return of +261. 2%, compared to -48. 5% for Wabash National Corporation (WNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALSN returned +373. 8% versus WNC's -22. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — REVG or WNC or PCAR or ALSN or OSK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PACCAR Inc (PCAR) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
01β versus Wabash National Corporation's 1. 93β — meaning WNC is approximately 91% more volatile than PCAR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, REV Group, Inc. (REVG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 156% for Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — REVG or WNC or PCAR or ALSN or OSK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), REV Group, Inc.
(REVG) is pulling ahead at 3. 5% versus -20. 8% for Wabash National Corporation (WNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Wabash National Corporation grew EPS 179. 2% year-over-year, compared to -60. 0% for REV Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OSK leads at 11. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — REVG or WNC or PCAR or ALSN or OSK?
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
(ALSN) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 7% net margin versus 3. 9% for REV Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALSN leads at 32. 3% versus 7. 8% for REVG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALSN leads at 48. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is REVG or WNC or PCAR or ALSN or OSK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 60x versus Oshkosh Corporation's 2. 86x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN) trades at 13. 6x forward P/E versus 19. 9x for PACCAR Inc — 6. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WNC: 124. 4% to $17. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — REVG or WNC or PCAR or ALSN or OSK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Wabash National Corporation (WNC) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 0. 2% for Oshkosh Corporation (OSK).
09Is REVG or WNC or PCAR or ALSN or OSK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PACCAR Inc (PCAR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
01), 3. 8% yield, +269. 8% 10Y return). Wabash National Corporation (WNC) carries a higher beta of 1. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PCAR: +269. 8%, WNC: -22. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between REVG and WNC and PCAR and ALSN and OSK?
These companies operate in different sectors (REVG (Industrials) and WNC (Industrials) and PCAR (Industrials) and ALSN (Consumer Cyclical) and OSK (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: REVG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WNC is a small-cap deep-value stock; PCAR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; ALSN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; OSK is a small-cap deep-value stock. WNC, PCAR, ALSN pay a dividend while REVG, OSK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.