RFIL
RF Industries, Ltd.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$165M
5Y Perf.+175.2%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
RFIL vs APH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
APH
Amphenol Corporation
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$157.40B
5Y Perf.+430.4%
RFIL vs APH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | RFIL | APH |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $165M | $157.40B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $80M | $25.90B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $270K | $4.48B |
| Gross Margin | 32.0% | 37.3% |
| Operating Margin | 3.4% | 26.0% |
| Forward P/E | 26.3x | 27.1x |
| Total Debt | $27M | $15.50B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $11.13B |
RFIL vs APH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
RFIL
APH
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| RF Industries, Ltd. (RFIL) | 100 | 275.2 | +175.2% |
| Amphenol Corporation (APH) | 100 | 530.4 | +430.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RFIL vs APH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: APH leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. RF Industries, Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
RFIL
RF Industries, Ltd.
The Value Play
RFIL is the clearest fit if your priority is value and momentum.
- Lower P/E (26.3x vs 27.1x)
- +284.9% vs APH's +59.9%
Best for: value and momentum
APH
Amphenol Corporation
The Income Pick
APH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 1.57, yield 0.5%
- Rev growth 51.7%, EPS growth 74.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.3%
- 8.4% 10Y total return vs RFIL's 5.6%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | APH | 51.7% revenue growth vs RFIL's 24.3% |
| Value | RFIL | Lower P/E (26.3x vs 27.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | APH | 17.3% margin vs RFIL's 0.3% |
| Stability / Safety | APH | Beta 1.57 vs RFIL's 2.11 |
| Dividends | APH | 0.5% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | RFIL | +284.9% vs APH's +59.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | APH | 13.6% ROA vs RFIL's 0.4%, ROIC 28.3% vs 3.6% |
RFIL vs APH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2019
FY 2025
RFIL vs APH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLAPHLAGGINGRFIL
RFILRF Industries, Ltd.
1leads
APHAmphenol Corporation
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs RFILMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
APH5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
RFIL4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
APH1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
APH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
APH is the larger business by revenue, generating $25.9B annually — 322.4x RFIL's $80M. APH is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RFIL's 0.3%. On growth, APH holds the edge at +58.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | RFILRF Industries, Lt… | APHAmphenol Corporat… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $80M | $25.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | $7.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $270,000 | $4.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | $4.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.0% | +37.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | +26.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.3% | +17.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | +17.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.2% | +58.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | +24.1% |
APH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — RFIL and APH each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 38.3x trailing earnings, APH trades at a 98% valuation discount to RFIL's 2182.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, APH's 23.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RFIL's 35.4x.
| Metric | RFILRF Industries, Lt… | APHAmphenol Corporat… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $165M | $157.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $187M | $161.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2182.86x | 38.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 26.34x | 27.14x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.38x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 35.39x | 23.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.05x | 6.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.67x | 12.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 38.04x | 35.95x |
Evenly matched — RFIL and APH each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — RFIL and APH each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
APH delivers a 34.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $35 in annual profit, vs $1 for RFIL. RFIL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.76x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to APH's 1.15x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RFIL scores 8/9 vs APH's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | RFILRF Industries, Lt… | APHAmphenol Corporat… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.8% | +34.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +13.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.6% | +28.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.2% | +25.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.76x | 1.15x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $22M | $4.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $11.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $27M | $15.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 13.54x |
Evenly matched — RFIL and APH each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RFIL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in APH five years ago would be worth $38,965 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $23,875 for RFIL. Over the past 12 months, RFIL leads with a +284.9% total return vs APH's +59.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RFIL at 56.6% vs APH's 51.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | RFILRF Industries, Lt… | APHAmphenol Corporat… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +169.0% | -8.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +284.9% | +59.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +283.9% | +244.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +138.7% | +289.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +561.0% | +838.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +56.6% | +51.1% |
RFIL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RFIL and APH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
APH is the less volatile stock with a 1.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RFIL's 2.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RFIL currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs APH's 76.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | RFILRF Industries, Lt… | APHAmphenol Corporat… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.11x | 1.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.80 | $167.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.82 | $80.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.7% | +76.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.0 | 42.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 247K | 8.5M |
Evenly matched — RFIL and APH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
APH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates RFIL as "Buy" and APH as "Buy". APH is the only dividend payer here at 0.49% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | RFILRF Industries, Lt… | APHAmphenol Corporat… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $180.89 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% |
APH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
APH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). RFIL leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
Best OverallAmphenol Corporation (APH)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
RFIL vs APH: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RFIL or APH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Amphenol Corporation (APH) is the stronger pick with 51.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 24. 3% for RF Industries, Ltd. (RFIL). Amphenol Corporation (APH) offers the better valuation at 38. 3x trailing P/E (27. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate RF Industries, Ltd. (RFIL) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RFIL or APH?
On trailing P/E, Amphenol Corporation (APH) is the cheapest at 38.
3x versus RF Industries, Ltd. at 2182. 9x. On forward P/E, RF Industries, Ltd. is actually cheaper at 26. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RFIL or APH?
Over the past 5 years, Amphenol Corporation (APH) delivered a total return of +289.
7%, compared to +138. 7% for RF Industries, Ltd. (RFIL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APH returned +838. 2% versus RFIL's +561. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RFIL or APH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amphenol Corporation (APH) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
57β versus RF Industries, Ltd. 's 2. 11β — meaning RFIL is approximately 35% more volatile than APH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, RF Industries, Ltd. (RFIL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 76% versus 115% for Amphenol Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RFIL or APH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amphenol Corporation (APH) is pulling ahead at 51.
7% versus 24. 3% for RF Industries, Ltd. (RFIL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RF Industries, Ltd. grew EPS 101. 1% year-over-year, compared to 74. 0% for Amphenol Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, APH leads at 22. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RFIL or APH?
Amphenol Corporation (APH) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
5% net margin versus 0. 1% for RF Industries, Ltd. — meaning it keeps 18. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: APH leads at 25. 9% versus 3. 5% for RFIL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — APH leads at 36. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RFIL or APH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, RF Industries, Ltd.
(RFIL) trades at 26. 3x forward P/E versus 27. 1x for Amphenol Corporation — 0. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — RFIL or APH?
In this comparison, APH (0.
5% yield) pays a dividend. RFIL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RFIL or APH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Amphenol Corporation (APH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+838.
2% 10Y return). RF Industries, Ltd. (RFIL) carries a higher beta of 2. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (APH: +838. 2%, RFIL: +561. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RFIL and APH?
These companies operate in different sectors (RFIL (Industrials) and APH (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(RFIL: -1.2% · APH: 58.4%)P/E Ratio<
x
(RFIL: 2182.9x · APH: 38.3x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.