Regulated Gas
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
RGCO vs ARTNA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Water
RGCO vs ARTNA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Gas | Regulated Water |
| Market Cap | $238M | $328M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $94M | $113M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14M | $23M |
| Gross Margin | 35.3% | 43.2% |
| Operating Margin | 20.4% | 28.0% |
| Forward P/E | 17.6x | 15.9x |
| Total Debt | $149M | $183M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $894K | $52K |
RGCO vs ARTNA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| RGC Resources, Inc. (RGCO) | 100 | 87.2 | -12.8% |
| Artesian Resources … (ARTNA) | 100 | 90.9 | -9.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RGCO vs ARTNA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RGCO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 107.0% 10Y total return vs ARTNA's 47.1%
- +10.6% vs ARTNA's -5.3%
- 4.2% ROA vs ARTNA's 2.8%, ROIC 5.2% vs 6.3%
ARTNA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 31 yrs, beta 0.01, yield 3.9%
- Rev growth 4.6%, EPS growth 11.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.01, Low D/E 73.1%, current ratio 0.64x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.6% revenue growth vs RGCO's -13.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.9x vs 17.6x), PEG 3.70 vs 12.20 | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.2% margin vs RGCO's 14.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs RGCO's 0.65, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.9% yield, 31-year raise streak, vs RGCO's 3.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +10.6% vs ARTNA's -5.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.2% ROA vs ARTNA's 2.8%, ROIC 5.2% vs 6.3% |
RGCO vs ARTNA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RGCO vs ARTNA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — RGCO and ARTNA each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARTNA and RGCO operate at a comparable scale, with $113M and $94M in trailing revenue. ARTNA is the more profitable business, keeping 20.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RGCO's 14.5%. On growth, RGCO holds the edge at +19.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $94M | $113M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $30M | $45M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14M | $23M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7M | $4M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.3% | +43.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.4% | +28.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.5% | +20.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.8% | +3.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.4% | +4.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.4% | +8.1% |
Valuation Metrics
ARTNA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.4x trailing earnings, ARTNA trades at a 27% valuation discount to RGCO's 19.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ARTNA offers better value at 3.35x vs RGCO's 13.78x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $238M | $328M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $385M | $511M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.84x | 14.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.56x | 15.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 13.78x | 3.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.96x | 10.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.81x | 2.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.16x | 1.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
RGCO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RGCO delivers a 11.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $9 for ARTNA. ARTNA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.73x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RGCO's 1.37x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RGCO scores 6/9 vs ARTNA's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.7% | +9.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.2% | +2.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.2% | +6.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.1% | +4.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.37x | 0.73x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $148M | $183M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $894,185 | $52,000 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $149M | $183M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.63x | 4.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RGCO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RGCO five years ago would be worth $12,336 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,186 for ARTNA. Over the past 12 months, RGCO leads with a +10.6% total return vs ARTNA's -5.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RGCO at 10.8% vs ARTNA's -13.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.6% | +2.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.6% | -5.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +36.0% | -35.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.4% | -8.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +107.0% | +47.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.8% | -13.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RGCO and ARTNA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ARTNA is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RGCO's 0.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RGCO currently trades 93.9% from its 52-week high vs ARTNA's 90.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.65x | 0.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.50 | $35.37 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.68 | $30.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.9% | +90.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.0 | 42.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 11K | 69K |
Analyst Outlook
ARTNA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates RGCO as "Buy" and ARTNA as "Buy". For income investors, ARTNA offers the higher dividend yield at 3.85% vs RGCO's 3.46%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.5% | +3.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 10 | 31 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.80 | $1.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ARTNA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). RGCO leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
RGCO vs ARTNA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RGCO or ARTNA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) is the stronger pick with 4.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 1% for RGC Resources, Inc. (RGCO). Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) offers the better valuation at 14. 4x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate RGC Resources, Inc. (RGCO) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RGCO or ARTNA?
On trailing P/E, Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) is the cheapest at 14.
4x versus RGC Resources, Inc. at 19. 8x. On forward P/E, Artesian Resources Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Artesian Resources Corporation wins at 3. 70x versus RGC Resources, Inc. 's 12. 20x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RGCO or ARTNA?
Over the past 5 years, RGC Resources, Inc.
(RGCO) delivered a total return of +23. 4%, compared to -8. 1% for Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RGCO returned +107. 0% versus ARTNA's +47. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RGCO or ARTNA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
01β versus RGC Resources, Inc. 's 0. 65β — meaning RGCO is approximately 5236% more volatile than ARTNA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 73% versus 137% for RGC Resources, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RGCO or ARTNA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) is pulling ahead at 4.
6% versus -13. 1% for RGC Resources, Inc. (RGCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Artesian Resources Corporation grew EPS 11. 6% year-over-year, compared to 1. 8% for RGC Resources, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARTNA leads at 4. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RGCO or ARTNA?
Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
2% net margin versus 13. 9% for RGC Resources, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ARTNA leads at 31. 5% versus 20. 2% for RGCO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARTNA leads at 37. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RGCO or ARTNA more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 70x versus RGC Resources, Inc. 's 12. 20x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) trades at 15. 9x forward P/E versus 17. 6x for RGC Resources, Inc. — 1. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — RGCO or ARTNA?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) offers the highest yield at 3. 9%, versus 3. 5% for RGC Resources, Inc. (RGCO).
09Is RGCO or ARTNA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
01), 3. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARTNA: +47. 1%, RGCO: +107. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RGCO and ARTNA?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RGCO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ARTNA is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare RGCO vs MSEX
MSEX is one of the most direct listed alternatives to RGCO.
Compare ARTNA vs MSEX
MSEX is one of the most direct listed alternatives to ARTNA.
Expand With MSEX + YORW
MSEX and YORW are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.