Regulated Gas
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
RGCO vs ARTNA vs MSEX vs YORW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Water
Regulated Water
Regulated Water
RGCO vs ARTNA vs MSEX vs YORW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Gas | Regulated Water | Regulated Water | Regulated Water |
| Market Cap | $246M | $326M | $955M | $421M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $107M | $113M | $199M | $-18M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14M | $23M | $44M | $21M |
| Gross Margin | 27.6% | 43.2% | 33.3% | 54.8% |
| Operating Margin | 17.3% | 28.0% | 28.1% | 35.8% |
| Forward P/E | 18.1x | 15.8x | 20.1x | 18.0x |
| Total Debt | $149M | $183M | $419M | $232M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $52K | $3M | $1K |
RGCO vs ARTNA vs MSEX vs YORW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| RGC Resources, Inc. (RGCO) | 100 | 89.6 | -10.4% |
| Artesian Resources … (ARTNA) | 100 | 90.2 | -9.8% |
| Middlesex Water Com… (MSEX) | 100 | 75.8 | -24.2% |
| The York Water Comp… (YORW) | 100 | 65.7 | -34.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RGCO vs ARTNA vs MSEX vs YORW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RGCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 12.6%, EPS growth 11.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.2%
- 108.5% 10Y total return vs MSEX's 62.9%
- 12.6% revenue growth vs MSEX's 1.5%
- +16.3% vs MSEX's -12.8%
ARTNA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 31 yrs, beta 0.01, yield 3.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.01, Low D/E 73.1%, current ratio 0.64x
- PEG 3.68 vs MSEX's 12.58
- Beta 0.01, yield 3.9%, current ratio 0.64x
MSEX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
YORW is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 25.9% margin vs RGCO's 13.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.6% revenue growth vs MSEX's 1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.8x vs 18.0x), PEG 3.68 vs 9.89 | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.9% margin vs RGCO's 13.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs RGCO's 0.65, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.9% yield, 31-year raise streak, vs MSEX's 2.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +16.3% vs MSEX's -12.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.2% ROA vs ARTNA's 2.8%, ROIC 5.4% vs 6.3% |
RGCO vs ARTNA vs MSEX vs YORW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RGCO vs ARTNA vs MSEX vs YORW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ARTNA leads in 2 of 6 categories
RGCO leads 2 • YORW leads 1 • MSEX leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
YORW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSEX and YORW operate at a comparable scale, with $199M and -$18M in trailing revenue. YORW is the more profitable business, keeping 25.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RGCO's 13.0%. On growth, RGCO holds the edge at +24.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $107M | $113M | $199M | -$18M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $30M | $45M | $81M | $42M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14M | $23M | $44M | $21M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $14M | $4M | -$19M | -$30M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.6% | +43.2% | +33.3% | +54.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.3% | +28.0% | +28.1% | +35.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.0% | +20.2% | +22.1% | +25.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | +3.3% | -9.7% | -24.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.7% | +4.3% | +10.0% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.5% | +8.1% | -100.0% | +32.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ARTNA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.3x trailing earnings, ARTNA trades at a 34% valuation discount to MSEX's 21.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ARTNA offers better value at 3.33x vs MSEX's 13.62x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $246M | $326M | $955M | $421M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $392M | $509M | $1.4B | $653M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.33x | 14.33x | 21.78x | 20.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.05x | 15.84x | 20.12x | 18.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 12.54x | 3.33x | 13.62x | 11.52x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.12x | 10.29x | 15.79x | 15.56x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.58x | 2.89x | 4.91x | 5.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.15x | 1.31x | 1.89x | 1.75x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 29.91x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
RGCO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RGCO delivers a 11.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $9 for YORW. ARTNA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.73x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RGCO's 1.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RGCO scores 7/9 vs YORW's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.9% | +9.3% | +9.1% | +8.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.2% | +2.8% | +3.2% | +3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.4% | +6.3% | +4.7% | +4.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.2% | +4.5% | +4.4% | +4.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.31x | 0.73x | 0.85x | 0.97x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $147M | $183M | $416M | $232M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $52,000 | $3M | $1,000 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $149M | $183M | $419M | $232M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.65x | 4.10x | 4.33x | 1.92x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RGCO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RGCO five years ago would be worth $12,815 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,799 for YORW. Over the past 12 months, RGCO leads with a +16.3% total return vs MSEX's -12.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RGCO at 11.7% vs ARTNA's -13.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.5% | +1.8% | +3.0% | -7.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +16.3% | -3.9% | -12.8% | -9.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.4% | -35.9% | -25.2% | -25.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.2% | -7.8% | -28.4% | -32.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +108.5% | +48.5% | +62.9% | +25.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.7% | -13.8% | -9.2% | -9.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RGCO and MSEX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MSEX is the less volatile stock with a -0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RGCO's 0.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RGCO currently trades 96.5% from its 52-week high vs MSEX's 82.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.65x | 0.01x | -0.12x | 0.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.50 | $35.37 | $62.18 | $35.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.68 | $30.50 | $44.17 | $28.26 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.5% | +89.6% | +82.7% | +83.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.4 | 49.5 | 44.1 | 34.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 11K | 69K | 160K | 174K |
Analyst Outlook
ARTNA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RGCO as "Buy", ARTNA as "Buy", MSEX as "Buy", YORW as "Hold". For income investors, ARTNA offers the higher dividend yield at 3.88% vs MSEX's 2.67%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $53.50 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.5% | +3.9% | +2.7% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 31 | 21 | 31 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.82 | $1.23 | $1.37 | $0.88 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ARTNA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). RGCO leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
RGCO vs ARTNA vs MSEX vs YORW: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RGCO or ARTNA or MSEX or YORW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, RGC Resources, Inc.
(RGCO) is the stronger pick with 12. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 5% for Middlesex Water Company (MSEX). Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) offers the better valuation at 14. 3x trailing P/E (15. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate RGC Resources, Inc. (RGCO) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RGCO or ARTNA or MSEX or YORW?
On trailing P/E, Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) is the cheapest at 14.
3x versus Middlesex Water Company at 21. 8x. On forward P/E, Artesian Resources Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Artesian Resources Corporation wins at 3. 68x versus Middlesex Water Company's 12. 58x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RGCO or ARTNA or MSEX or YORW?
Over the past 5 years, RGC Resources, Inc.
(RGCO) delivered a total return of +28. 2%, compared to -32. 0% for The York Water Company (YORW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RGCO returned +108. 5% versus YORW's +25. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RGCO or ARTNA or MSEX or YORW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
12β versus RGC Resources, Inc. 's 0. 65β — meaning RGCO is approximately -620% more volatile than MSEX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 73% versus 131% for RGC Resources, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RGCO or ARTNA or MSEX or YORW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), RGC Resources, Inc.
(RGCO) is pulling ahead at 12. 6% versus 1. 5% for Middlesex Water Company (MSEX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Artesian Resources Corporation grew EPS 11. 6% year-over-year, compared to -4. 5% for Middlesex Water Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, YORW leads at 8. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RGCO or ARTNA or MSEX or YORW?
The York Water Company (YORW) is the more profitable company, earning 25.
9% net margin versus 13. 9% for RGC Resources, Inc. — meaning it keeps 25. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: YORW leads at 35. 8% versus 19. 4% for RGCO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — YORW leads at 54. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RGCO or ARTNA or MSEX or YORW more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 68x versus Middlesex Water Company's 12. 58x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) trades at 15. 8x forward P/E versus 20. 1x for Middlesex Water Company — 4. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — RGCO or ARTNA or MSEX or YORW?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) offers the highest yield at 3. 9%, versus 2. 7% for Middlesex Water Company (MSEX).
09Is RGCO or ARTNA or MSEX or YORW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
12), 2. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSEX: +62. 9%, RGCO: +108. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RGCO and ARTNA and MSEX and YORW?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RGCO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ARTNA is a small-cap deep-value stock; MSEX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; YORW is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.