Specialty Business Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
RHLD vs MRCC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
RHLD vs MRCC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Business Services | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $891M | $110M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $766M | $21M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-121M | $-5M |
| Gross Margin | 47.2% | 60.8% |
| Operating Margin | 14.6% | 51.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 14.9x |
| Total Debt | $195M | $191M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $161M | $2M |
RHLD vs MRCC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Resolute Holdings M… (RHLD) | 100 | 230.5 | +130.5% |
| Monroe Capital Corp… (MRCC) | 100 | 52.2 | -47.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RHLD vs MRCC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RHLD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.89
- Rev growth 9.9%, EPS growth -121.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.9%
- 200.7% 10Y total return vs MRCC's 22.8%
MRCC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, current ratio 1.64x
- Beta 0.74, yield 0.2%, current ratio 1.64x
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.9% revenue growth vs MRCC's -39.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 53.8% margin vs RHLD's -15.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs RHLD's 1.89, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +288.2% vs MRCC's -6.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -1.3% ROA vs RHLD's -6.8%, ROIC 2.0% vs 96.1% |
RHLD vs MRCC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RHLD vs MRCC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MRCC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RHLD is the larger business by revenue, generating $766M annually — 36.1x MRCC's $21M. MRCC is the more profitable business, keeping 53.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RHLD's -15.9%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $766M | $21M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $119M | $11M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$121M | -$5M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $46M | $25M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.2% | +60.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.6% | +51.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -15.9% | +53.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | +5.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.9% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.4% | -51.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — RHLD and MRCC each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $891M | $110M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $925M | $108M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -156.41x | 9.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.21x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.06x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.93x | 3.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 11.83x | 0.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.71x | 0.95x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — RHLD and MRCC each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MRCC delivers a -2.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-3 in annual profit, vs $-15 for RHLD. MRCC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RHLD's 2.51x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -15.2% | -2.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.8% | -1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +96.1% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +56.0% | +2.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.51x | 1.15x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $34M | $189M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $161M | $2M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $195M | $191M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.99x | 0.69x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RHLD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RHLD five years ago would be worth $30,070 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,905 for MRCC. Over the past 12 months, RHLD leads with a +288.2% total return vs MRCC's -6.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RHLD at 44.3% vs MRCC's 5.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -42.1% | -11.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +288.2% | -6.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +200.7% | +18.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +200.7% | -0.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +200.7% | +22.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +44.3% | +5.7% |
Risk & Volatility
MRCC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MRCC is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RHLD's 1.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MRCC currently trades 65.5% from its 52-week high vs RHLD's 45.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.89x | 0.74x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $236.19 | $7.76 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.57 | $4.04 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +45.7% | +65.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.5 | 50.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 215K | 156K |
Analyst Outlook
RHLD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
MRCC is the only dividend payer here at 0.24% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.93 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | 0.0% |
MRCC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). RHLD leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
RHLD vs MRCC: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RHLD or MRCC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Resolute Holdings Management, Inc.
(RHLD) is the stronger pick with 9. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -39. 7% for Monroe Capital Corporation (MRCC). Monroe Capital Corporation (MRCC) offers the better valuation at 9. 6x trailing P/E (14. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Monroe Capital Corporation (MRCC) a "Hold" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — RHLD or MRCC?
Over the past 5 years, Resolute Holdings Management, Inc.
(RHLD) delivered a total return of +200. 7%, compared to -0. 9% for Monroe Capital Corporation (MRCC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RHLD returned +200. 7% versus MRCC's +22. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — RHLD or MRCC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Monroe Capital Corporation (MRCC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
74β versus Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. 's 1. 89β — meaning RHLD is approximately 156% more volatile than MRCC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Monroe Capital Corporation (MRCC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 115% versus 3% for Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — RHLD or MRCC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Resolute Holdings Management, Inc.
(RHLD) is pulling ahead at 9. 9% versus -39. 7% for Monroe Capital Corporation (MRCC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Monroe Capital Corporation grew EPS 17. 8% year-over-year, compared to -121. 0% for Resolute Holdings Management, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — RHLD or MRCC?
Monroe Capital Corporation (MRCC) is the more profitable company, earning 53.
8% net margin versus 29. 4% for Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. — meaning it keeps 53. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MRCC leads at 51. 7% versus 31. 0% for RHLD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MRCC leads at 60. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — RHLD or MRCC?
In this comparison, MRCC (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. RHLD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is RHLD or MRCC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Monroe Capital Corporation (MRCC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
74)). Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. (RHLD) carries a higher beta of 1. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MRCC: +22. 8%, RHLD: +200. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between RHLD and MRCC?
These companies operate in different sectors (RHLD (Industrials) and MRCC (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RHLD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MRCC is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.