Industrial Materials
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
RIO vs AA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aluminum
RIO vs AA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial Materials | Aluminum |
| Market Cap | $210.59B | $16.38B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $107.92B | $12.74B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $20.96B | $1.15B |
| Gross Margin | 27.7% | 13.6% |
| Operating Margin | 27.2% | 7.6% |
| Forward P/E | 12.9x | 9.1x |
| Total Debt | $13.86B | $1M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6.83B | $1.60B |
RIO vs AA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rio Tinto Group (RIO) | 100 | 195.7 | +95.7% |
| Alcoa Corporation (AA) | 100 | 686.8 | +586.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RIO vs AA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RIO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.98, yield 4.1%
- 396.1% 10Y total return vs AA's 188.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.98, Low D/E 23.9%, current ratio 1.63x
AA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 4.5%, EPS growth 14.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.1%
- 4.5% revenue growth vs RIO's -0.7%
- Lower P/E (9.1x vs 12.9x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.5% revenue growth vs RIO's -0.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.1x vs 12.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.4% margin vs AA's 9.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.98 vs AA's 1.77 | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs AA's 0.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +156.1% vs RIO's +83.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.4% ROA vs AA's 7.1%, ROIC 18.6% vs 12.7% |
RIO vs AA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RIO vs AA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RIO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RIO is the larger business by revenue, generating $107.9B annually — 8.5x AA's $12.7B. RIO is the more profitable business, keeping 19.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AA's 9.0%. On growth, RIO holds the edge at +1.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $107.9B | $12.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $41.0B | $1.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $21.0B | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $12.7B | $567M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.7% | +13.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.2% | +7.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | +9.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | +4.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.1% | -13.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -21.6% | +11.8% |
Valuation Metrics
AA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.2x trailing earnings, AA trades at a 5% valuation discount to RIO's 14.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AA's 9.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RIO's 10.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $210.6B | $16.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $217.6B | $14.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.92x | 14.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.89x | 9.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.94x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.50x | 9.27x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.92x | 1.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.97x | 2.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 35.23x | 28.89x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RIO leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RIO delivers a 33.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $18 for AA. AA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RIO's 0.24x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +33.8% | +18.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +17.4% | +7.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.6% | +12.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.2% | +8.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.24x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7.0B | -$1.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6.8B | $1.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13.9B | $1M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 14.58x | 7.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RIO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AA five years ago would be worth $16,307 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,578 for RIO. Over the past 12 months, AA leads with a +156.1% total return vs RIO's +83.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RIO at 22.7% vs AA's 20.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +32.7% | +12.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +83.1% | +156.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +84.6% | +75.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.8% | +63.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +396.1% | +188.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.7% | +20.5% |
Risk & Volatility
RIO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RIO is the less volatile stock with a 0.98 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AA's 1.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RIO currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs AA's 83.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.98x | 1.77x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $105.94 | $75.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $55.64 | $24.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.6% | +83.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.9 | 43.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.9M | 5.5M |
Analyst Outlook
RIO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates RIO as "Hold" and AA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.8% upside for AA (target: $69) vs -3.6% for RIO (target: $102). For income investors, RIO offers the higher dividend yield at 4.08% vs AA's 0.62%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $101.75 | $68.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 31 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.1% | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.30 | $0.39 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RIO leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
RIO vs AA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RIO or AA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alcoa Corporation (AA) is the stronger pick with 4.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 7% for Rio Tinto Group (RIO). Alcoa Corporation (AA) offers the better valuation at 14. 2x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alcoa Corporation (AA) a "Buy" — based on 42 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RIO or AA?
On trailing P/E, Alcoa Corporation (AA) is the cheapest at 14.
2x versus Rio Tinto Group at 14. 9x. On forward P/E, Alcoa Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RIO or AA?
Over the past 5 years, Alcoa Corporation (AA) delivered a total return of +63.
1%, compared to +45. 8% for Rio Tinto Group (RIO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RIO returned +396. 1% versus AA's +188. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RIO or AA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Rio Tinto Group (RIO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
98β versus Alcoa Corporation's 1. 77β — meaning AA is approximately 82% more volatile than RIO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alcoa Corporation (AA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 24% for Rio Tinto Group — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RIO or AA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alcoa Corporation (AA) is pulling ahead at 4.
5% versus -0. 7% for Rio Tinto Group (RIO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alcoa Corporation grew EPS 1486% year-over-year, compared to 14. 8% for Rio Tinto Group. Over a 3-year CAGR, AA leads at -0. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RIO or AA?
Rio Tinto Group (RIO) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
5% net margin versus 9. 0% for Alcoa Corporation — meaning it keeps 21. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RIO leads at 29. 2% versus 7. 6% for AA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RIO leads at 56. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RIO or AA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Alcoa Corporation (AA) trades at 9.
1x forward P/E versus 12. 9x for Rio Tinto Group — 3. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AA: 8. 8% to $68. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — RIO or AA?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Rio Tinto Group (RIO) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 0. 6% for Alcoa Corporation (AA).
09Is RIO or AA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Rio Tinto Group (RIO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
98), 4. 1% yield, +396. 1% 10Y return). Alcoa Corporation (AA) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RIO: +396. 1%, AA: +188. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RIO and AA?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.