RLGT vs EXPD

For growth investors, Radiant Logistics, Inc.

(RLGT) is the stronger pick with 12. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 4% for Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (EXPD). Radiant Logistics, Inc. (RLGT) offers the better valuation at 23. 7x trailing P/E (34. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Radiant Logistics, Inc. (RLGT) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Radiant Logistics, Inc.

(RLGT) is the cheapest at 23. 7x versus Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. at 25. 5x. On forward P/E, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. is actually cheaper at 25. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. wins at 3. 18x versus Radiant Logistics, Inc. 's 3. 23x.

Over the past 5 years, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.

(EXPD) delivered a total return of +33. 8%, compared to +16. 9% for Radiant Logistics, Inc. (RLGT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXPD returned +238. 1% versus RLGT's +120. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.

(EXPD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 75β versus Radiant Logistics, Inc. 's 1. 16β — meaning RLGT is approximately 54% more volatile than EXPD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (EXPD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 37% for Radiant Logistics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Radiant Logistics, Inc.

(RLGT) is pulling ahead at 12. 5% versus 4. 4% for Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (EXPD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Radiant Logistics, Inc. grew EPS 118. 8% year-over-year, compared to 4. 0% for Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EXPD leads at -13. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.

(EXPD) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 4% net margin versus 1. 9% for Radiant Logistics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EXPD leads at 9. 5% versus 2. 3% for RLGT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RLGT leads at 17. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (EXPD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 18x versus Radiant Logistics, Inc. 's 3. 23x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (EXPD) trades at 25. 1x forward P/E versus 34. 7x for Radiant Logistics, Inc. — 9. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RLGT: 8. 3% to $9. 00.

In this comparison, EXPD (1.

0% yield) pays a dividend. RLGT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.

(EXPD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 75), 1. 0% yield, +238. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXPD: +238. 1%, RLGT: +120. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

EXPD pays a dividend while RLGT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.