Integrated Freight & Logistics
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
RLGT vs HUBG vs JBHT vs FWRD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Integrated Freight & Logistics
Integrated Freight & Logistics
Integrated Freight & Logistics
RLGT vs HUBG vs JBHT vs FWRD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Integrated Freight & Logistics |
| Market Cap | $389M | $2.61B | $22.91B | $547M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $893M | $3.73B | $12.00B | $2.46B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14M | $105M | $598M | $-91M |
| Gross Margin | 12.2% | 48.7% | 14.0% | 23.1% |
| Operating Margin | 2.0% | 3.8% | 7.2% | 2.1% |
| Forward P/E | 34.7x | 26.2x | 33.0x | — |
| Total Debt | $83M | $509M | $1.47B | $2.16B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $23M | $98M | $17M | $106M |
RLGT vs HUBG vs JBHT vs FWRD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Radiant Logistics, … (RLGT) | 100 | 208.3 | +108.3% |
| Hub Group, Inc. (HUBG) | 100 | 183.9 | +83.9% |
| J.B. Hunt Transport… (JBHT) | 100 | 202.4 | +102.4% |
| Forward Air Corpora… (FWRD) | 100 | 34.9 | -65.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RLGT vs HUBG vs JBHT vs FWRD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RLGT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 12.5%, EPS growth 118.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -14.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.16, Low D/E 36.8%, current ratio 1.56x
- PEG 3.23 vs HUBG's 21.49
- 12.5% revenue growth vs HUBG's -6.1%
HUBG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 1.21, yield 1.2%, current ratio 1.33x
- Better valuation composite
- 1.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JBHT's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
JBHT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.07, yield 0.7%
- 203.9% 10Y total return vs HUBG's 122.3%
- 5.0% margin vs FWRD's -3.7%
- Beta 1.07 vs FWRD's 2.28, lower leverage
FWRD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.5% revenue growth vs HUBG's -6.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.0% margin vs FWRD's -3.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.07 vs FWRD's 2.28, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JBHT's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +83.5% vs FWRD's +0.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs FWRD's -3.3%, ROIC 12.0% vs 1.2% |
RLGT vs HUBG vs JBHT vs FWRD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RLGT vs HUBG vs JBHT vs FWRD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JBHT leads in 3 of 6 categories
HUBG leads 1 • RLGT leads 0 • FWRD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JBHT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JBHT is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.0B annually — 13.4x RLGT's $893M. JBHT is the more profitable business, keeping 5.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FWRD's -3.7%. On growth, JBHT holds the edge at -1.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $893M | $3.7B | $12.0B | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $34M | $331M | $1.6B | $206M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14M | $105M | $598M | -$91M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $8M | $113M | $948M | $38M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | +48.7% | +14.0% | +23.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.0% | +3.8% | +7.2% | +2.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | +2.8% | +5.0% | -3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.9% | +3.0% | +7.9% | +1.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -12.3% | -5.3% | -1.6% | -5.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.4% | +20.5% | +24.2% | +35.1% |
Valuation Metrics
HUBG leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.7x trailing earnings, RLGT trades at a 40% valuation discount to JBHT's 39.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), RLGT offers better value at 2.21x vs HUBG's 20.74x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $389M | $2.6B | $22.9B | $547M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $449M | $3.0B | $24.4B | $2.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.74x | 25.30x | 39.57x | -4.98x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 34.70x | 26.22x | 33.04x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.21x | 20.74x | 7.55x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.40x | 9.06x | 15.42x | 13.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.43x | 0.66x | 1.91x | 0.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.79x | 1.55x | 6.64x | 3.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 47.78x | 18.15x | 24.18x | 35.82x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JBHT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JBHT delivers a 16.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-53 for FWRD. HUBG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FWRD's 13.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HUBG scores 7/9 vs FWRD's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.1% | +6.1% | +16.8% | -52.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.2% | +3.7% | +7.5% | -3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.0% | +5.1% | +12.0% | +1.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.4% | +6.1% | +13.5% | +1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.37x | 0.30x | 0.41x | 13.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $60M | $410M | $1.4B | $2.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $23M | $98M | $17M | $106M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $83M | $509M | $1.5B | $2.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.36x | 11.77x | 12.19x | 0.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JBHT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JBHT five years ago would be worth $14,024 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,978 for FWRD. Over the past 12 months, JBHT leads with a +83.5% total return vs FWRD's +0.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JBHT at 11.5% vs FWRD's -42.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +31.5% | +0.9% | +23.3% | -31.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +39.4% | +37.5% | +83.5% | +0.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.0% | +20.2% | +38.8% | -81.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.9% | +21.2% | +40.2% | -80.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +120.4% | +122.3% | +203.9% | -47.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.9% | +6.3% | +11.5% | -42.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RLGT and JBHT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JBHT is the less volatile stock with a 1.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FWRD's 2.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RLGT currently trades 95.7% from its 52-week high vs FWRD's 53.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.16x | 1.21x | 1.07x | 2.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.68 | $53.26 | $256.18 | $32.47 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.78 | $31.52 | $130.12 | $14.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.7% | +80.8% | +94.5% | +53.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.9 | 58.7 | 58.0 | 42.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 129K | 723K | 902K | 733K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HUBG and JBHT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RLGT as "Buy", HUBG as "Hold", JBHT as "Buy", FWRD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 113.5% upside for FWRD (target: $37) vs -7.1% for JBHT (target: $225). For income investors, HUBG offers the higher dividend yield at 1.15% vs JBHT's 0.72%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.00 | $44.33 | $224.88 | $37.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 31 | 45 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.2% | +0.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 12 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.49 | $1.75 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +3.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
JBHT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HUBG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
RLGT vs HUBG vs JBHT vs FWRD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RLGT or HUBG or JBHT or FWRD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Radiant Logistics, Inc.
(RLGT) is the stronger pick with 12. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 1% for Hub Group, Inc. (HUBG). Radiant Logistics, Inc. (RLGT) offers the better valuation at 23. 7x trailing P/E (34. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Radiant Logistics, Inc. (RLGT) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RLGT or HUBG or JBHT or FWRD?
On trailing P/E, Radiant Logistics, Inc.
(RLGT) is the cheapest at 23. 7x versus J. B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. at 39. 6x. On forward P/E, Hub Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 26. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Radiant Logistics, Inc. wins at 3. 23x versus Hub Group, Inc. 's 21. 49x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RLGT or HUBG or JBHT or FWRD?
Over the past 5 years, J.
B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (JBHT) delivered a total return of +40. 2%, compared to -80. 2% for Forward Air Corporation (FWRD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JBHT returned +203. 9% versus FWRD's -47. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RLGT or HUBG or JBHT or FWRD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), J.
B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (JBHT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 07β versus Forward Air Corporation's 2. 28β — meaning FWRD is approximately 114% more volatile than JBHT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hub Group, Inc. (HUBG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 13% for Forward Air Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RLGT or HUBG or JBHT or FWRD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Radiant Logistics, Inc.
(RLGT) is pulling ahead at 12. 5% versus -6. 1% for Hub Group, Inc. (HUBG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Radiant Logistics, Inc. grew EPS 118. 8% year-over-year, compared to -35. 1% for Hub Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FWRD leads at 14. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RLGT or HUBG or JBHT or FWRD?
J.
B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (JBHT) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 0% net margin versus -4. 3% for Forward Air Corporation — meaning it keeps 5. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JBHT leads at 7. 2% versus 1. 5% for FWRD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HUBG leads at 85. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RLGT or HUBG or JBHT or FWRD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Radiant Logistics, Inc. (RLGT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 23x versus Hub Group, Inc. 's 21. 49x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Hub Group, Inc. (HUBG) trades at 26. 2x forward P/E versus 34. 7x for Radiant Logistics, Inc. — 8. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FWRD: 113. 5% to $37. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — RLGT or HUBG or JBHT or FWRD?
In this comparison, HUBG (1.
2% yield), JBHT (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. RLGT, FWRD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RLGT or HUBG or JBHT or FWRD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, J.
B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (JBHT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 07), 0. 7% yield, +203. 9% 10Y return). Forward Air Corporation (FWRD) carries a higher beta of 2. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JBHT: +203. 9%, FWRD: -47. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RLGT and HUBG and JBHT and FWRD?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
HUBG, JBHT pay a dividend while RLGT, FWRD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.