Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
RLMD vs PRAX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
RLMD vs PRAX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $545M | $9.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $-92K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-57M | $-327M |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $110K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $357M |
RLMD vs PRAX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Relmada Therapeutic… (RLMD) | 100 | 120.0 | +20.0% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 63.5 | -36.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RLMD vs PRAX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RLMD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.40
- EPS growth 45.3%
- 312.8% 10Y total return vs PRAX's -20.1%
PRAX is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.
- 2.4% margin vs RLMD's 1.5%
- -40.2% ROA vs RLMD's -145.6%, ROIC -65.0% vs -77.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -60.5% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.4% margin vs RLMD's 1.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.40 vs PRAX's 1.55 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.6% vs PRAX's +7.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -40.2% ROA vs RLMD's -145.6%, ROIC -65.0% vs -77.3% |
RLMD vs PRAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RLMD vs PRAX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RLMD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RLMD and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $0 and -$92,000 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | -$92,000 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$59M | -$357M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$57M | -$327M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | -$283M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +53.2% | +2.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — RLMD and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $545M | $9.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $541M | $9.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.12x | -24.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.39x | 8.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PRAX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PRAX delivers a -43.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-43 in annual profit, vs $-171 for RLMD.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -170.8% | -43.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -145.6% | -40.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -77.3% | -65.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -96.0% | -49.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | -$357M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $357M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $110,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RLMD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RLMD five years ago would be worth $10,220 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,918 for PRAX. Over the past 12 months, RLMD leads with a +2060.5% total return vs PRAX's +775.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs RLMD's 103.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +70.0% | +16.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2060.5% | +775.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +739.5% | +1976.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.2% | -20.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +312.8% | -20.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +103.2% | +174.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RLMD and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RLMD is the less volatile stock with a 1.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRAX's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.40x | 1.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.00 | $356.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.32 | $35.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.9% | +93.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.0 | 55.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.0M | 378K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates RLMD as "Buy" and PRAX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.3% upside for PRAX (target: $544) vs 21.1% for RLMD (target: $9).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.00 | $544.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RLMD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). PRAX leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
RLMD vs PRAX: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RLMD or PRAX a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Relmada Therapeutics, Inc.
(RLMD) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — RLMD or PRAX?
Over the past 5 years, Relmada Therapeutics, Inc.
(RLMD) delivered a total return of +2. 2%, compared to -20. 8% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RLMD returned +312. 8% versus PRAX's -20. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — RLMD or PRAX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Relmada Therapeutics, Inc.
(RLMD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 40β versus Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. 's 1. 55β — meaning PRAX is approximately 10% more volatile than RLMD relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — RLMD or PRAX?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Relmada Therapeutics, Inc.
grew EPS 45. 3% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — RLMD or PRAX?
Relmada Therapeutics, Inc.
(RLMD) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus 0. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RLMD leads at 0. 0% versus 0. 0% for PRAX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RLMD leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — RLMD or PRAX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is RLMD or PRAX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Relmada Therapeutics, Inc.
(RLMD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+312. 8% 10Y return). Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RLMD: +312. 8%, PRAX: -20. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between RLMD and PRAX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.