Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
RLYB vs ARQT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
RLYB vs ARQT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $83M | $2.58B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $674K | $416M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-14M | $-2M |
| Gross Margin | 95.5% | 90.9% |
| Operating Margin | -56.8% | 0.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 77.6x |
| Total Debt | $154K | $6M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $43M |
RLYB vs ARQT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rallybio Corporation (RLYB) | 100 | 10.8 | -89.2% |
| Arcutis Biotherapeu… (ARQT) | 100 | 88.6 | -11.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RLYB vs ARQT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RLYB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.32
- Lower volatility, beta 1.32, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 10.87x
- Beta 1.32, current ratio 10.87x
ARQT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 91.3%, EPS growth 88.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 367.3%
- -5.2% 10Y total return vs RLYB's -87.0%
- 91.3% revenue growth vs RLYB's -18.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 91.3% revenue growth vs RLYB's -18.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | -0.6% margin vs RLYB's -21.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.32 vs ARQT's 1.48, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.1% vs ARQT's +50.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.6% ROA vs RLYB's -23.2%, ROIC -5.2% vs -69.8% |
RLYB vs ARQT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RLYB vs ARQT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARQT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARQT is the larger business by revenue, generating $416M annually — 616.7x RLYB's $674,000. ARQT is the more profitable business, keeping -0.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RLYB's -21.0%. On growth, ARQT holds the edge at +60.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $674,000 | $416M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$38M | $6M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$14M | -$2M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$35M | $27M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +95.5% | +90.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -56.8% | +0.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -21.0% | -0.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -51.9% | +6.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -29.1% | +60.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.4% | +55.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ARQT leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $83M | $2.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $69M | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.38x | -158.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 77.64x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 129.83x | 6.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.29x | 13.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ARQT leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ARQT delivers a -1.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-1 in annual profit, vs $-25 for RLYB. RLYB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARQT's 0.03x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -25.2% | -1.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -23.2% | -0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -69.8% | -5.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -71.9% | -4.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$14M | -$37M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $43M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $154,000 | $6M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 2.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ARQT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARQT five years ago would be worth $6,053 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,300 for RLYB. Over the past 12 months, RLYB leads with a +510.8% total return vs ARQT's +50.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARQT at 13.2% vs RLYB's -32.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +159.0% | -28.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +510.8% | +50.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.5% | +44.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.0% | -39.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.0% | -5.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -32.7% | +13.2% |
Risk & Volatility
RLYB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RLYB is the less volatile stock with a 1.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARQT's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RLYB currently trades 95.8% from its 52-week high vs ARQT's 65.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.32x | 1.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.31 | $31.77 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.58 | $12.42 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.8% | +65.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 90.0 | 54.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 394K | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates RLYB as "Buy" and ARQT as "Buy".
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $35.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ARQT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). RLYB leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility).
RLYB vs ARQT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RLYB or ARQT a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Rallybio Corporation (RLYB) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison.
The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — RLYB or ARQT?
Over the past 5 years, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) delivered a total return of -39. 5%, compared to -87. 0% for Rallybio Corporation (RLYB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARQT returned -5. 2% versus RLYB's -87. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — RLYB or ARQT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Rallybio Corporation (RLYB) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
32β versus Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 48β — meaning ARQT is approximately 12% more volatile than RLYB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Rallybio Corporation (RLYB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — RLYB or ARQT?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
grew EPS 88. 8% year-over-year, compared to 27. 7% for Rallybio Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — RLYB or ARQT?
Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) is the more profitable company, earning -4. 3% net margin versus -90. 8% for Rallybio Corporation — meaning it keeps -4. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ARQT leads at -3. 3% versus -95. 1% for RLYB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RLYB leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — RLYB or ARQT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is RLYB or ARQT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Rallybio Corporation (RLYB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
Both have compounded well over 10 years (RLYB: -87. 0%, ARQT: -5. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between RLYB and ARQT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RLYB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARQT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.