RMAX vs COMP

For growth investors, Compass, Inc.

(COMP) is the stronger pick with 23. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. (RMAX). RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. (RMAX) offers the better valuation at 27. 6x trailing P/E (8. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Compass, Inc. (COMP) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, RE/MAX Holdings, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 8. 6x.

Over the past 5 years, Compass, Inc.

(COMP) delivered a total return of -48. 3%, compared to -63. 2% for RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. (RMAX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RMAX returned -54. 8% versus COMP's -56. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RE/MAX Holdings, Inc.

(RMAX) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 39β versus Compass, Inc. 's 1. 79β — meaning COMP is approximately 28% more volatile than RMAX relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Compass, Inc.

(COMP) is pulling ahead at 23. 7% versus -5. 2% for RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. (RMAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Compass, Inc. grew EPS 67. 7% year-over-year, compared to 8. 1% for RE/MAX Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, COMP leads at 5. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

RE/MAX Holdings, Inc.

(RMAX) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 8% net margin versus -0. 8% for Compass, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RMAX leads at 15. 6% versus -0. 4% for COMP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RMAX leads at 57. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, RE/MAX Holdings, Inc.

(RMAX) trades at 8. 6x forward P/E versus 53. 5x for Compass, Inc. — 45. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COMP: 63. 3% to $14. 29.

In this comparison, RMAX (0.

2% yield) pays a dividend. COMP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, RE/MAX Holdings, Inc.

(RMAX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Compass, Inc. (COMP) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RMAX: -54. 8%, COMP: -56. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (RMAX (Real Estate) and COMP (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: RMAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; COMP is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.