Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RMD vs PHG vs ITGR vs NVCR vs INSP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
Medical - Devices
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Devices
RMD vs PHG vs ITGR vs NVCR vs INSP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $30.15B | $25.84B | $3.03B | $1.92B | $1.31B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.54B | $17.83B | $1.85B | $674M | $915M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.52B | $895M | $142M | $-173M | $131M |
| Gross Margin | 61.7% | 45.2% | 23.3% | 75.2% | 85.8% |
| Operating Margin | 34.3% | 8.0% | 10.4% | -27.2% | 5.6% |
| Forward P/E | 18.8x | 17.5x | 13.5x | — | 24.5x |
| Total Debt | $852M | $8.09B | $1.40B | $290M | $32M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.21B | $2.79B | $17M | $103M | $105M |
RMD vs PHG vs ITGR vs NVCR vs INSP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ResMed Inc. (RMD) | 100 | 128.7 | +28.7% |
| Koninklijke Philips… (PHG) | 100 | 65.9 | -34.1% |
| Integer Holdings Co… (ITGR) | 100 | 111.0 | +11.0% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 25.0 | -75.0% |
| Inspire Medical Sys… (INSP) | 100 | 55.9 | -44.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RMD vs PHG vs ITGR vs NVCR vs INSP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RMD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 1.0%
- 293.8% 10Y total return vs ITGR's 165.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 14.3%, current ratio 3.44x
- PEG 1.08 vs ITGR's 3.08
PHG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends and momentum is your priority.
- 1.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs RMD's 1.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
- +17.7% vs INSP's -70.9%
ITGR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, NVCR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
INSP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 13.6%, EPS growth 179.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.8%
- 13.6% revenue growth vs PHG's -1.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.6% revenue growth vs PHG's -1.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.4% margin vs NVCR's -25.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs RMD's 1.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +17.7% vs INSP's -70.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.0% ROA vs NVCR's -16.5%, ROIC 22.8% vs -16.4% |
RMD vs PHG vs ITGR vs NVCR vs INSP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
RMD vs PHG vs ITGR vs NVCR vs INSP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RMD leads in 2 of 6 categories
PHG leads 1 • ITGR leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • INSP leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RMD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PHG is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.8B annually — 26.4x NVCR's $674M. RMD is the more profitable business, keeping 27.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NVCR's -25.7%. On growth, NVCR holds the edge at +12.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.5B | $17.8B | $1.8B | $674M | $915M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.1B | $2.5B | $328M | -$165M | $62M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.5B | $895M | $142M | -$173M | $131M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.8B | $755M | $168M | -$48M | $97M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.7% | +45.2% | +23.3% | +75.2% | +85.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +34.3% | +8.0% | +10.4% | -27.2% | +5.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +27.4% | +5.0% | +7.7% | -25.7% | +14.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +31.7% | +4.2% | +9.1% | -7.1% | +10.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.8% | +1.1% | +0.8% | +12.3% | +1.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.3% | +2.1% | +172.7% | -100.0% | -5.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PHG and INSP each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.3x trailing earnings, INSP trades at a 69% valuation discount to ITGR's 30.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), RMD offers better value at 1.25x vs ITGR's 6.91x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $30.1B | $25.8B | $3.0B | $1.9B | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $29.8B | $32.1B | $4.4B | $2.1B | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.76x | 24.85x | 30.42x | -13.80x | 9.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.78x | 17.55x | 13.55x | — | 24.46x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.25x | — | 6.91x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.51x | 10.70x | 13.15x | — | 19.11x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.86x | 1.23x | 1.64x | 2.92x | 1.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.11x | 2.02x | 1.79x | 5.51x | 1.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.14x | 24.62x | 28.78x | — | 16.73x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RMD leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RMD delivers a 24.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-51 for NVCR. INSP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVCR's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RMD scores 8/9 vs NVCR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +24.4% | +8.2% | +8.2% | -50.8% | +18.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +18.0% | +3.4% | +4.2% | -16.5% | +15.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +22.8% | +6.4% | +5.4% | -16.4% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +25.7% | +7.1% | +6.9% | -28.9% | +6.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.14x | 0.74x | 0.80x | 0.85x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$358M | $5.3B | $1.4B | $187M | -$73M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.2B | $2.8B | $17M | $103M | $105M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $852M | $8.1B | $1.4B | $290M | $32M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 66.06x | 4.34x | 5.07x | -96.80x | 418.58x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PHG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RMD five years ago would be worth $11,100 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $875 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, PHG leads with a +17.7% total return vs INSP's -70.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PHG at 11.6% vs INSP's -45.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.2% | +0.3% | +14.5% | +28.3% | -50.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -14.5% | +17.7% | -26.1% | +1.1% | -70.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.4% | +38.8% | +8.8% | -75.7% | -83.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.0% | -42.7% | -7.5% | -91.3% | -76.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +293.8% | +48.3% | +165.1% | +30.3% | +82.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.9% | +11.6% | +2.9% | -37.6% | -45.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RMD and NVCR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RMD is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVCR currently trades 83.9% from its 52-week high vs INSP's 27.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.66x | 1.12x | 0.72x | 2.20x | 1.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $293.81 | $33.44 | $123.78 | $20.06 | $163.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $198.64 | $21.95 | $62.00 | $9.82 | $44.41 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.4% | +81.2% | +71.0% | +83.9% | +27.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.6 | 47.7 | 50.9 | 69.8 | 31.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 1.0M | 628K | 1.5M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — RMD and PHG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RMD as "Buy", PHG as "Hold", ITGR as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", INSP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 100.4% upside for INSP (target: $91) vs 11.5% for ITGR (target: $98). For income investors, PHG offers the higher dividend yield at 1.47% vs RMD's 1.02%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $281.29 | — | $98.00 | $33.50 | $91.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 35 | 22 | 14 | 15 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.0% | +1.5% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 14 | 1 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.11 | $0.34 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | 0.0% | +1.7% | 0.0% | +13.3% |
RMD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PHG leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
RMD vs PHG vs ITGR vs NVCR vs INSP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RMD or PHG or ITGR or NVCR or INSP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Inspire Medical Systems, Inc.
(INSP) is the stronger pick with 13. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 0% for Koninklijke Philips N. V. (PHG). Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. (INSP) offers the better valuation at 9. 3x trailing P/E (24. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ResMed Inc. (RMD) a "Buy" — based on 35 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RMD or PHG or ITGR or NVCR or INSP?
On trailing P/E, Inspire Medical Systems, Inc.
(INSP) is the cheapest at 9. 3x versus Integer Holdings Corporation at 30. 4x. On forward P/E, Integer Holdings Corporation is actually cheaper at 13. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ResMed Inc. wins at 1. 08x versus Integer Holdings Corporation's 3. 08x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RMD or PHG or ITGR or NVCR or INSP?
Over the past 5 years, ResMed Inc.
(RMD) delivered a total return of +11. 0%, compared to -91. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RMD returned +293. 8% versus NVCR's +30. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RMD or PHG or ITGR or NVCR or INSP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ResMed Inc.
(RMD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 20β — meaning NVCR is approximately 236% more volatile than RMD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. (INSP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 85% for NovoCure Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RMD or PHG or ITGR or NVCR or INSP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Inspire Medical Systems, Inc.
(INSP) is pulling ahead at 13. 6% versus -1. 0% for Koninklijke Philips N. V. (PHG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Koninklijke Philips N. V. grew EPS 224. 0% year-over-year, compared to -15. 0% for Integer Holdings Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, INSP leads at 30. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RMD or PHG or ITGR or NVCR or INSP?
ResMed Inc.
(RMD) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 2% net margin versus -20. 8% for NovoCure Limited — meaning it keeps 27. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RMD leads at 32. 7% versus -23. 5% for NVCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INSP leads at 85. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RMD or PHG or ITGR or NVCR or INSP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, ResMed Inc. (RMD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 08x versus Integer Holdings Corporation's 3. 08x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Integer Holdings Corporation (ITGR) trades at 13. 5x forward P/E versus 24. 5x for Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. — 10. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INSP: 100. 4% to $91. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — RMD or PHG or ITGR or NVCR or INSP?
In this comparison, PHG (1.
5% yield), RMD (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. ITGR, NVCR, INSP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RMD or PHG or ITGR or NVCR or INSP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ResMed Inc.
(RMD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 66), 1. 0% yield, +293. 8% 10Y return). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RMD: +293. 8%, NVCR: +30. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RMD and PHG and ITGR and NVCR and INSP?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RMD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PHG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ITGR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; INSP is a small-cap deep-value stock. RMD, PHG pay a dividend while ITGR, NVCR, INSP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.