Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

RMR vs BN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
RMR
The RMR Group Inc.

Real Estate - Services

Real EstateNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$293M
5Y Perf.-27.7%
BN
Brookfield Corporation

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • CA
Market Cap$102.89B
5Y Perf.+169.2%

RMR vs BN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
RMR logoRMR
BN logoBN
IndustryReal Estate - ServicesAsset Management
Market Cap$293M$102.89B
Revenue (TTM)$661M$77.66B
Net Income (TTM)$23M$1.31B
Gross Margin92.4%40.0%
Operating Margin9.9%39.9%
Forward P/E26.5x16.4x
Total Debt$204M$263.42B
Cash & Equiv.$62M$16.24B

RMR vs BNLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

RMR
BN
StockMay 20May 26Return
The RMR Group Inc. (RMR)10072.3-27.7%
Brookfield Corporat… (BN)100269.2+169.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: RMR vs BN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: RMR leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Brookfield Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
RMR
The RMR Group Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

RMR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 9.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.65, Low D/E 50.8%, current ratio 1.64x
  • Beta 0.65, yield 9.4%, current ratio 1.64x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
BN
Brookfield Corporation
The Banking Pick

BN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth -9.7%, EPS growth -99.8%
  • 300.6% 10Y total return vs RMR's 59.6%
  • -9.7% NII/revenue growth vs RMR's -22.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBN logoBN-9.7% NII/revenue growth vs RMR's -22.0%
ValueBN logoBNLower P/E (16.4x vs 26.5x)
Quality / MarginsRMR logoRMR3.5% margin vs BN's 1.7%
Stability / SafetyRMR logoRMRBeta 0.65 vs BN's 1.57, lower leverage
DividendsRMR logoRMR9.4% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)RMR logoRMR+47.2% vs BN's +26.5%
Efficiency (ROA)RMR logoRMR3.4% ROA vs BN's 0.3%, ROIC 6.7% vs 5.6%

RMR vs BN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

RMRThe RMR Group Inc.
FY 2025
Reimbursements, Other
61.2%$422M
Management Service
25.8%$178M
Reimbursement, Payroll Related And Other Costs
11.3%$78M
Reimbursement Client Company Equity Based Conpensation
1.0%$7M
Investment Advisory, Management and Administrative Service
0.6%$4M
Management Service, Incentive
0.1%$653,000
BNBrookfield Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

RMR vs BN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLRMRLAGGINGBN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

RMR leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

BN is the larger business by revenue, generating $77.7B annually — 117.4x RMR's $661M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.5% (RMR) to 1.7% (BN).

MetricRMR logoRMRThe RMR Group Inc.BN logoBNBrookfield Corpor…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$661M$77.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$79M$32.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$23M$1.3B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$58M-$2.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+92.4%+40.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+9.9%+39.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+3.5%+1.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+8.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-17.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+86.8%+73.1%
RMR leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

RMR leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 18.9x trailing earnings, RMR trades at a 100% valuation discount to BN's 9999.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RMR's 8.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BN's 8.5x.

MetricRMR logoRMRThe RMR Group Inc.BN logoBNBrookfield Corpor…
Market CapShares × price$293M$102.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$434M$350.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS18.93x9999.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.26.53x16.45x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.14x8.49x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.42x1.32x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.81x0.65x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF4.06x
RMR leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

RMR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

RMR delivers a 5.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $1 for BN. RMR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.51x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BN's 1.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BN scores 5/9 vs RMR's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricRMR logoRMRThe RMR Group Inc.BN logoBNBrookfield Corpor…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+5.6%+0.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+3.4%+0.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.7%+5.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+7.2%+7.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–945
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.51x1.59x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$142M$247.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$62M$16.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$204M$263.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense12.29x1.64x
RMR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BN five years ago would be worth $19,069 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,831 for RMR. Over the past 12 months, RMR leads with a +47.2% total return vs BN's +26.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BN at 30.5% vs RMR's 3.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricRMR logoRMRThe RMR Group Inc.BN logoBNBrookfield Corpor…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+34.8%-1.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+47.2%+26.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+10.0%+122.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-11.7%+90.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+59.6%+300.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+3.2%+30.5%
BN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

RMR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

RMR is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BN's 1.57 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RMR currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs BN's 92.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricRMR logoRMRThe RMR Group Inc.BN logoBNBrookfield Corpor…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.65x1.57x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$19.68$49.57
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$13.48$35.95
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.1%+92.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10072.455.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded153K5.7M
RMR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

RMR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates RMR as "Hold" and BN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 64.1% upside for RMR (target: $32) vs 18.7% for BN (target: $54). RMR is the only dividend payer here at 9.35% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricRMR logoRMRThe RMR Group Inc.BN logoBNBrookfield Corpor…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$32.00$54.40
# AnalystsCovering analysts149
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+9.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises31
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.82
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.3%0.0%
RMR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

RMR leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BN leads in 1 (Total Returns).

Best OverallThe RMR Group Inc. (RMR)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

RMR vs BN: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is RMR or BN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Brookfield Corporation (BN) is the stronger pick with -9.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 0% for The RMR Group Inc. (RMR). The RMR Group Inc. (RMR) offers the better valuation at 18. 9x trailing P/E (26. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Brookfield Corporation (BN) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — RMR or BN?

On trailing P/E, The RMR Group Inc.

(RMR) is the cheapest at 18. 9x versus Brookfield Corporation at 9999. 0x. On forward P/E, Brookfield Corporation is actually cheaper at 16. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — RMR or BN?

Over the past 5 years, Brookfield Corporation (BN) delivered a total return of +90.

7%, compared to -11. 7% for The RMR Group Inc. (RMR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BN returned +300. 6% versus RMR's +59. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — RMR or BN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The RMR Group Inc.

(RMR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus Brookfield Corporation's 1. 57β — meaning BN is approximately 142% more volatile than RMR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The RMR Group Inc. (RMR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 51% versus 159% for Brookfield Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — RMR or BN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Brookfield Corporation (BN) is pulling ahead at -9.

7% versus -22. 0% for The RMR Group Inc. (RMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The RMR Group Inc. grew EPS -25. 4% year-over-year, compared to -99. 8% for Brookfield Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — RMR or BN?

The RMR Group Inc.

(RMR) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 5% net margin versus 1. 7% for Brookfield Corporation — meaning it keeps 2. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BN leads at 39. 9% versus 6. 0% for RMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RMR leads at 76. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is RMR or BN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Brookfield Corporation (BN) trades at 16.

4x forward P/E versus 26. 5x for The RMR Group Inc. — 10. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RMR: 64. 1% to $32. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — RMR or BN?

In this comparison, RMR (9.

4% yield) pays a dividend. BN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is RMR or BN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The RMR Group Inc.

(RMR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 65), 9. 4% yield). Brookfield Corporation (BN) carries a higher beta of 1. 57 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RMR: +59. 6%, BN: +300. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between RMR and BN?

These companies operate in different sectors (RMR (Real Estate) and BN (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: RMR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. RMR pays a dividend while BN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

RMR

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 55%
  • Dividend Yield > 3.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 24%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform RMR and BN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(RMR: -17.8% · BN: -9.7%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(RMR: 18.9x · BN: 9999.0x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.