Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
RMR vs BN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
RMR vs BN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $293M | $102.89B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $661M | $77.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $23M | $1.31B |
| Gross Margin | 92.4% | 40.0% |
| Operating Margin | 9.9% | 39.9% |
| Forward P/E | 26.5x | 16.4x |
| Total Debt | $204M | $263.42B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $62M | $16.24B |
RMR vs BN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The RMR Group Inc. (RMR) | 100 | 72.3 | -27.7% |
| Brookfield Corporat… (BN) | 100 | 269.2 | +169.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RMR vs BN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RMR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 9.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65, Low D/E 50.8%, current ratio 1.64x
- Beta 0.65, yield 9.4%, current ratio 1.64x
BN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -9.7%, EPS growth -99.8%
- 300.6% 10Y total return vs RMR's 59.6%
- -9.7% NII/revenue growth vs RMR's -22.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -9.7% NII/revenue growth vs RMR's -22.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.4x vs 26.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.5% margin vs BN's 1.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs BN's 1.57, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 9.4% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +47.2% vs BN's +26.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.4% ROA vs BN's 0.3%, ROIC 6.7% vs 5.6% |
RMR vs BN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RMR vs BN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RMR leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BN is the larger business by revenue, generating $77.7B annually — 117.4x RMR's $661M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.5% (RMR) to 1.7% (BN).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $661M | $77.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $79M | $32.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $23M | $1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $58M | -$2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +92.4% | +40.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.9% | +39.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.5% | +1.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.8% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -17.8% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +86.8% | +73.1% |
Valuation Metrics
RMR leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.9x trailing earnings, RMR trades at a 100% valuation discount to BN's 9999.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RMR's 8.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BN's 8.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $293M | $102.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $434M | $350.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.93x | 9999.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 26.53x | 16.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.14x | 8.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.42x | 1.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.81x | 0.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.06x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
RMR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RMR delivers a 5.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $1 for BN. RMR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.51x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BN's 1.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BN scores 5/9 vs RMR's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.6% | +0.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.4% | +0.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.7% | +5.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.2% | +7.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.51x | 1.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $142M | $247.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $62M | $16.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $204M | $263.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 12.29x | 1.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BN five years ago would be worth $19,069 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,831 for RMR. Over the past 12 months, RMR leads with a +47.2% total return vs BN's +26.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BN at 30.5% vs RMR's 3.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +34.8% | -1.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +47.2% | +26.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.0% | +122.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.7% | +90.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.6% | +300.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.2% | +30.5% |
Risk & Volatility
RMR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RMR is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BN's 1.57 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RMR currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs BN's 92.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.65x | 1.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.68 | $49.57 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.48 | $35.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.1% | +92.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 72.4 | 55.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 153K | 5.7M |
Analyst Outlook
RMR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates RMR as "Hold" and BN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 64.1% upside for RMR (target: $32) vs 18.7% for BN (target: $54). RMR is the only dividend payer here at 9.35% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $32.00 | $54.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +9.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.82 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% |
RMR leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BN leads in 1 (Total Returns).
RMR vs BN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RMR or BN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Brookfield Corporation (BN) is the stronger pick with -9.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 0% for The RMR Group Inc. (RMR). The RMR Group Inc. (RMR) offers the better valuation at 18. 9x trailing P/E (26. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Brookfield Corporation (BN) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RMR or BN?
On trailing P/E, The RMR Group Inc.
(RMR) is the cheapest at 18. 9x versus Brookfield Corporation at 9999. 0x. On forward P/E, Brookfield Corporation is actually cheaper at 16. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RMR or BN?
Over the past 5 years, Brookfield Corporation (BN) delivered a total return of +90.
7%, compared to -11. 7% for The RMR Group Inc. (RMR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BN returned +300. 6% versus RMR's +59. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RMR or BN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The RMR Group Inc.
(RMR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus Brookfield Corporation's 1. 57β — meaning BN is approximately 142% more volatile than RMR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The RMR Group Inc. (RMR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 51% versus 159% for Brookfield Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RMR or BN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Brookfield Corporation (BN) is pulling ahead at -9.
7% versus -22. 0% for The RMR Group Inc. (RMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The RMR Group Inc. grew EPS -25. 4% year-over-year, compared to -99. 8% for Brookfield Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RMR or BN?
The RMR Group Inc.
(RMR) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 5% net margin versus 1. 7% for Brookfield Corporation — meaning it keeps 2. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BN leads at 39. 9% versus 6. 0% for RMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RMR leads at 76. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RMR or BN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Brookfield Corporation (BN) trades at 16.
4x forward P/E versus 26. 5x for The RMR Group Inc. — 10. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RMR: 64. 1% to $32. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — RMR or BN?
In this comparison, RMR (9.
4% yield) pays a dividend. BN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RMR or BN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The RMR Group Inc.
(RMR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 65), 9. 4% yield). Brookfield Corporation (BN) carries a higher beta of 1. 57 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RMR: +59. 6%, BN: +300. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RMR and BN?
These companies operate in different sectors (RMR (Real Estate) and BN (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RMR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. RMR pays a dividend while BN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.