Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
RMR vs BN vs BX vs KKR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
Asset Management
RMR vs BN vs BX vs KKR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $293M | $102.89B | $96.16B | $90.94B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $661M | $77.66B | $13.83B | $19.26B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $23M | $1.31B | $3.02B | $2.37B |
| Gross Margin | 92.4% | 40.0% | 86.0% | 41.8% |
| Operating Margin | 9.9% | 39.9% | 51.9% | 2.4% |
| Forward P/E | 26.5x | 16.4x | 20.6x | 16.7x |
| Total Debt | $204M | $263.42B | $13.31B | $54.77B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $62M | $16.24B | $2.63B | $6M |
RMR vs BN vs BX vs KKR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The RMR Group Inc. (RMR) | 100 | 72.3 | -27.7% |
| Brookfield Corporat… (BN) | 100 | 269.2 | +169.2% |
| Blackstone Inc. (BX) | 100 | 216.1 | +116.1% |
| KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) | 100 | 367.6 | +267.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RMR vs BN vs BX vs KKR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RMR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 9.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65, Low D/E 50.8%, current ratio 1.64x
- Beta 0.65, yield 9.4%, current ratio 1.64x
- Beta 0.65 vs KKR's 1.70, lower leverage
BN is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (16.4x vs 16.7x)
BX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 21.6%, EPS growth 7.2%
- 21.6% NII/revenue growth vs RMR's -22.0%
- 21.8% margin vs BN's 1.7%
- 6.5% ROA vs BN's 0.3%, ROIC 16.1% vs 5.6%
KKR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.2% 10Y total return vs BN's 300.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.6% NII/revenue growth vs RMR's -22.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.4x vs 16.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.8% margin vs BN's 1.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs KKR's 1.70, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 9.4% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs KKR's 0.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +47.2% vs KKR's -10.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.5% ROA vs BN's 0.3%, ROIC 16.1% vs 5.6% |
RMR vs BN vs BX vs KKR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RMR vs BN vs BX vs KKR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RMR leads in 2 of 6 categories
BX leads 1 • BN leads 1 • KKR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — RMR and BX each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BN is the larger business by revenue, generating $77.7B annually — 117.4x RMR's $661M. BX is the more profitable business, keeping 21.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BN's 1.7%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $661M | $77.7B | $13.8B | $19.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $79M | $32.1B | $7.2B | $9.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $23M | $1.3B | $3.0B | $2.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $58M | -$2.8B | $3.5B | $7.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +92.4% | +40.0% | +86.0% | +41.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.9% | +39.9% | +51.9% | +2.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.5% | +1.7% | +21.8% | +12.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.8% | — | +12.6% | +49.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -17.8% | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +86.8% | +73.1% | +41.3% | -1.7% |
Valuation Metrics
RMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.9x trailing earnings, RMR trades at a 100% valuation discount to BN's 9999.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RMR's 8.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KKR's 20.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $293M | $102.9B | $96.2B | $90.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $434M | $350.1B | $106.8B | $145.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.93x | 9999.00x | 31.63x | 43.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 26.53x | 16.45x | 20.56x | 16.70x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.51x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.14x | 8.49x | 14.81x | 20.45x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.42x | 1.32x | 6.95x | 4.72x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.81x | 0.65x | 4.38x | 1.19x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.06x | — | 55.11x | 9.55x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BX delivers a 14.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $1 for BN. RMR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.51x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BN's 1.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KKR scores 6/9 vs RMR's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.6% | +0.8% | +14.3% | +3.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.4% | +0.3% | +6.5% | +0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.7% | +5.6% | +16.1% | +0.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.2% | +7.2% | +16.9% | +0.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.51x | 1.59x | 0.61x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $142M | $247.2B | $10.7B | $54.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $62M | $16.2B | $2.6B | $6M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $204M | $263.4B | $13.3B | $54.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 12.29x | 1.64x | 14.12x | 3.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BN five years ago would be worth $19,069 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,831 for RMR. Over the past 12 months, RMR leads with a +47.2% total return vs KKR's -10.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BN at 30.5% vs RMR's 3.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +34.8% | -1.5% | -21.1% | -20.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +47.2% | +26.5% | -6.2% | -10.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.0% | +122.4% | +64.4% | +102.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.7% | +90.7% | +63.0% | +81.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.6% | +300.6% | +478.0% | +720.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.2% | +30.5% | +18.0% | +26.4% |
Risk & Volatility
RMR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RMR is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KKR's 1.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RMR currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs BX's 64.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.65x | 1.57x | 1.53x | 1.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.68 | $49.57 | $190.09 | $153.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.48 | $35.95 | $101.73 | $82.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.1% | +92.5% | +64.6% | +66.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 72.4 | 55.7 | 52.4 | 58.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 153K | 5.7M | 7.3M | 6.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — RMR and KKR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RMR as "Hold", BN as "Buy", BX as "Buy", KKR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 64.1% upside for RMR (target: $32) vs 18.7% for BN (target: $54). For income investors, RMR offers the higher dividend yield at 9.35% vs KKR's 0.79%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $32.00 | $54.40 | $156.29 | $143.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 9 | 29 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +9.4% | — | +6.3% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.82 | — | $7.70 | $0.80 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% | +0.3% | +0.1% |
RMR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). BX leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
RMR vs BN vs BX vs KKR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RMR or BN or BX or KKR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Blackstone Inc.
(BX) is the stronger pick with 21. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 0% for The RMR Group Inc. (RMR). The RMR Group Inc. (RMR) offers the better valuation at 18. 9x trailing P/E (26. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Brookfield Corporation (BN) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RMR or BN or BX or KKR?
On trailing P/E, The RMR Group Inc.
(RMR) is the cheapest at 18. 9x versus Brookfield Corporation at 9999. 0x. On forward P/E, Brookfield Corporation is actually cheaper at 16. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RMR or BN or BX or KKR?
Over the past 5 years, Brookfield Corporation (BN) delivered a total return of +90.
7%, compared to -11. 7% for The RMR Group Inc. (RMR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KKR returned +720. 7% versus RMR's +59. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RMR or BN or BX or KKR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The RMR Group Inc.
(RMR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus KKR & Co. Inc. 's 1. 70β — meaning KKR is approximately 163% more volatile than RMR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The RMR Group Inc. (RMR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 51% versus 159% for Brookfield Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RMR or BN or BX or KKR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Blackstone Inc.
(BX) is pulling ahead at 21. 6% versus -22. 0% for The RMR Group Inc. (RMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Blackstone Inc. grew EPS 7. 2% year-over-year, compared to -99. 8% for Brookfield Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RMR or BN or BX or KKR?
Blackstone Inc.
(BX) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 8% net margin versus 1. 7% for Brookfield Corporation — meaning it keeps 21. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BX leads at 51. 9% versus 2. 4% for KKR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BX leads at 86. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RMR or BN or BX or KKR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Brookfield Corporation (BN) trades at 16.
4x forward P/E versus 26. 5x for The RMR Group Inc. — 10. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RMR: 64. 1% to $32. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — RMR or BN or BX or KKR?
In this comparison, RMR (9.
4% yield), BX (6. 3% yield), KKR (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. BN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RMR or BN or BX or KKR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The RMR Group Inc.
(RMR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 65), 9. 4% yield). Brookfield Corporation (BN) carries a higher beta of 1. 57 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RMR: +59. 6%, BN: +300. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RMR and BN and BX and KKR?
These companies operate in different sectors (RMR (Real Estate) and BN (Financial Services) and BX (Financial Services) and KKR (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RMR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BX is a mid-cap high-growth stock; KKR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. RMR, BX, KKR pay a dividend while BN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.