Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
RNAZ vs IONS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
RNAZ vs IONS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $7M | $12.56B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-27M | $-327M |
| Gross Margin | — | 98.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | -33.3% |
| Total Debt | $38K | $2.61B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $372M |
RNAZ vs IONS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TransCode Therapeut… (RNAZ) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Ionis Pharmaceutica… (IONS) | 100 | 204.7 | +104.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RNAZ vs IONS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RNAZ is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- EPS growth 98.6%
- -0.4% margin vs IONS's -30.9%
- -0.5% ROA vs IONS's -10.1%
IONS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.55
- 121.1% 10Y total return vs RNAZ's -100.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.55, current ratio 3.83x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 33.9% revenue growth vs RNAZ's -87.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | -0.4% margin vs IONS's -30.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.55 vs RNAZ's 0.95 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +129.9% vs RNAZ's -19.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.5% ROA vs IONS's -10.1% |
RNAZ vs IONS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RNAZ vs IONS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IONS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IONS and RNAZ operate at a comparable scale, with $1.1B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$17M | $4.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$27M | -$327M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15M | -$971M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +98.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -33.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -30.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -91.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +87.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -380.7% | +39.8% |
Valuation Metrics
IONS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $12.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $896,691 | $14.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.17x | -31.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 13.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 24.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
RNAZ leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RNAZ delivers a -1.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-2 in annual profit, vs $-59 for IONS. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RNAZ scores 4/9 vs IONS's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -1.9% | -58.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.5% | -10.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -12.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.1% | -14.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 5.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$6M | $2.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $372M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $38,291 | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3431.07x | -3.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IONS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IONS five years ago would be worth $20,805 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for RNAZ. Over the past 12 months, IONS leads with a +129.9% total return vs RNAZ's -19.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IONS at 29.3% vs RNAZ's -96.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.1% | -4.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -19.6% | +129.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +116.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +108.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -96.3% | +29.3% |
Risk & Volatility
IONS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IONS is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RNAZ's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IONS currently trades 87.6% from its 52-week high vs RNAZ's 38.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 0.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.99 | $86.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.08 | $31.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +38.1% | +87.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 31.2 | 58.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8K | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $107.27 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
IONS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). RNAZ leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency).
RNAZ vs IONS: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RNAZ or IONS a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — RNAZ or IONS?
Over the past 5 years, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) delivered a total return of +108. 0%, compared to -100. 0% for TransCode Therapeutics, Inc. (RNAZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IONS returned +121. 1% versus RNAZ's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — RNAZ or IONS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 55β versus TransCode Therapeutics, Inc. 's 0. 95β — meaning RNAZ is approximately 74% more volatile than IONS relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — RNAZ or IONS?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TransCode Therapeutics, Inc.
grew EPS 98. 6% year-over-year, compared to 21. 7% for Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — RNAZ or IONS?
TransCode Therapeutics, Inc.
(RNAZ) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -40. 4% for Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RNAZ leads at 0. 0% versus -40. 5% for IONS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IONS leads at 98. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — RNAZ or IONS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is RNAZ or IONS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 55), +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IONS: +121. 1%, RNAZ: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between RNAZ and IONS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RNAZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IONS is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.