Renewable Utilities
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RNW vs GE vs RTX vs CWEN vs LMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
Renewable Utilities
Aerospace & Defense
RNW vs GE vs RTX vs CWEN vs LMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Renewable Utilities | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense | Renewable Utilities | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $1.33B | $316.20B | $238.07B | $7.84B | $118.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $129.66B | $48.35B | $90.37B | $1.43B | $75.11B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $11.97B | $8.66B | $7.26B | $169M | $4.79B |
| Gross Margin | 77.9% | 34.8% | 20.2% | 50.3% | 9.8% |
| Operating Margin | 48.4% | 18.5% | 10.4% | 12.0% | 9.9% |
| Forward P/E | 0.4x | 40.0x | 25.5x | 26.9x | 17.1x |
| Total Debt | $732.28B | $20.49B | $39.51B | $10.20B | $21.70B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $40.42B | $12.39B | $7.43B | $818M | $4.12B |
RNW vs GE vs RTX vs CWEN vs LMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ReNew Energy Global… (RNW) | 100 | 49.1 | -50.9% |
| GE Aerospace (GE) | 100 | 484.8 | +384.8% |
| RTX Corporation (RTX) | 100 | 245.6 | +145.6% |
| Clearway Energy, In… (CWEN) | 100 | 138.9 | +38.9% |
| Lockheed Martin Cor… (LMT) | 100 | 155.2 | +55.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RNW vs GE vs RTX vs CWEN vs LMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RNW has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 19.4%, EPS growth 10.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.8%
- 19.4% revenue growth vs CWEN's 4.2%
- Lower P/E (0.4x vs 25.5x)
GE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and momentum is your priority.
- 17.9% margin vs LMT's 6.4%
- +44.9% vs RNW's -17.7%
Among these 5 stocks, RTX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CWEN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 237.4% 10Y total return vs RTX's 234.7%
- PEG 0.59 vs GE's 3.39
- 7.9% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs LMT's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
LMT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 2.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, current ratio 1.09x
- Beta 0.12, yield 2.6%, current ratio 1.09x
- Beta 0.12 vs GE's 1.14
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.4% revenue growth vs CWEN's 4.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.4x vs 25.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.9% margin vs LMT's 6.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs GE's 1.14 | |
| Dividends | 7.9% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs LMT's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.9% vs RNW's -17.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.0% ROA vs CWEN's 1.1%, ROIC 23.9% vs 0.9% |
RNW vs GE vs RTX vs CWEN vs LMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RNW vs GE vs RTX vs CWEN vs LMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RNW leads in 2 of 6 categories
LMT leads 1 • GE leads 1 • RTX leads 0 • CWEN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RNW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RNW is the larger business by revenue, generating $129.7B annually — 90.7x CWEN's $1.4B. GE is the more profitable business, keeping 17.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LMT's 6.4%. On growth, RNW holds the edge at +37.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $129.7B | $48.4B | $90.4B | $1.4B | $75.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $86.9B | $9.9B | $13.8B | $1.0B | $8.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $12.0B | $8.7B | $7.3B | $169M | $4.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$23.8B | $7.5B | $8.4B | $268M | $5.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +77.9% | +34.8% | +20.2% | +50.3% | +9.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +48.4% | +18.5% | +10.4% | +12.0% | +9.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.2% | +17.9% | +8.0% | +11.8% | +6.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -18.4% | +15.4% | +9.2% | +18.8% | +7.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +37.2% | +24.7% | +8.7% | +21.1% | +0.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +94.8% | -1.1% | +32.5% | -35.3% | -11.5% |
Valuation Metrics
RNW leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.8x trailing earnings, LMT trades at a 49% valuation discount to RNW's 46.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CWEN offers better value at 0.59x vs GE's 3.14x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $316.2B | $238.1B | $7.8B | $118.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.6B | $324.3B | $270.1B | $17.2B | $135.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 46.91x | 37.09x | 35.64x | 26.86x | 23.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.40x | 40.02x | 25.54x | — | 17.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.14x | — | 0.59x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.27x | 32.46x | 20.96x | 16.23x | 16.07x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.30x | 6.90x | 2.69x | 5.48x | 1.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.43x | 17.09x | 3.57x | 0.77x | 17.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 43.53x | 29.98x | 21.24x | 17.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LMT leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LMT delivers a 74.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $75 in annual profit, vs $3 for CWEN. RTX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.59x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RNW's 5.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RTX scores 8/9 vs CWEN's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.4% | +45.8% | +10.9% | +3.0% | +74.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +6.8% | +4.3% | +1.1% | +8.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.9% | +24.7% | +6.7% | +0.9% | +23.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.9% | +9.6% | +7.9% | +1.2% | +21.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.59x | 1.08x | 0.59x | 1.72x | 3.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $691.9B | $8.1B | $32.1B | $9.4B | $17.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $40.4B | $12.4B | $7.4B | $818M | $4.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $732.3B | $20.5B | $39.5B | $10.2B | $21.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 86.76x | 11.69x | 5.58x | 0.55x | 6.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GE five years ago would be worth $46,249 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,427 for RNW. Over the past 12 months, GE leads with a +44.9% total return vs RNW's -17.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GE at 56.0% vs RNW's 1.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.8% | -5.5% | -5.2% | +13.7% | +3.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -17.7% | +44.9% | +40.8% | +39.6% | +11.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.4% | +280.0% | +93.0% | +43.5% | +22.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.7% | +362.5% | +120.1% | +72.5% | +46.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.5% | +121.0% | +234.7% | +237.4% | +156.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.5% | +56.0% | +24.5% | +12.8% | +6.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CWEN and LMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GE's 1.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CWEN currently trades 91.8% from its 52-week high vs RNW's 65.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.62x | 1.14x | 0.51x | 0.54x | 0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.24 | $348.48 | $214.50 | $41.54 | $692.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.38 | $208.22 | $126.03 | $27.67 | $410.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.5% | +86.8% | +82.4% | +91.8% | +74.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.1 | 56.4 | 37.3 | 45.9 | 28.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 734K | 5.7M | 5.3M | 828K | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CWEN and LMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RNW as "Buy", GE as "Buy", RTX as "Buy", CWEN as "Buy", LMT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 27.6% upside for GE (target: $386) vs 14.5% for CWEN (target: $44). For income investors, CWEN offers the higher dividend yield at 7.89% vs GE's 0.45%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.52 | $386.20 | $224.89 | $43.67 | $635.11 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 34 | 26 | 16 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% | +1.5% | +7.9% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 23 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.36 | $2.63 | $3.01 | $13.50 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.4% | +0.0% | 0.0% | +2.5% |
RNW leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). LMT leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
RNW vs GE vs RTX vs CWEN vs LMT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RNW or GE or RTX or CWEN or LMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ReNew Energy Global Plc (RNW) is the stronger pick with 19.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 2% for Clearway Energy, Inc. (CWEN). Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) offers the better valuation at 23. 8x trailing P/E (17. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ReNew Energy Global Plc (RNW) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RNW or GE or RTX or CWEN or LMT?
On trailing P/E, Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) is the cheapest at 23.
8x versus ReNew Energy Global Plc at 46. 9x. On forward P/E, ReNew Energy Global Plc is actually cheaper at 0. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RNW or GE or RTX or CWEN or LMT?
Over the past 5 years, GE Aerospace (GE) delivered a total return of +362.
5%, compared to -45. 7% for ReNew Energy Global Plc (RNW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CWEN returned +237. 4% versus RNW's -50. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RNW or GE or RTX or CWEN or LMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
12β versus GE Aerospace's 1. 14β — meaning GE is approximately 824% more volatile than LMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, RTX Corporation (RTX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 59% versus 6% for ReNew Energy Global Plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RNW or GE or RTX or CWEN or LMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ReNew Energy Global Plc (RNW) is pulling ahead at 19.
4% versus 4. 2% for Clearway Energy, Inc. (CWEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Clearway Energy, Inc. grew EPS 89. 3% year-over-year, compared to -3. 7% for Lockheed Martin Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, RNW leads at 17. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RNW or GE or RTX or CWEN or LMT?
GE Aerospace (GE) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
0% net margin versus 3. 9% for ReNew Energy Global Plc — meaning it keeps 19. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RNW leads at 53. 5% versus 10. 0% for RTX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RNW leads at 91. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RNW or GE or RTX or CWEN or LMT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ReNew Energy Global Plc (RNW) trades at 0.
4x forward P/E versus 40. 0x for GE Aerospace — 39. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GE: 27. 6% to $386. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — RNW or GE or RTX or CWEN or LMT?
In this comparison, CWEN (7.
9% yield), LMT (2. 6% yield), RTX (1. 5% yield), GE (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. RNW does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RNW or GE or RTX or CWEN or LMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
12), 2. 6% yield, +156. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LMT: +156. 2%, GE: +121. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RNW and GE and RTX and CWEN and LMT?
These companies operate in different sectors (RNW (Utilities) and GE (Industrials) and RTX (Industrials) and CWEN (Utilities) and LMT (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RNW is a small-cap high-growth stock; GE is a large-cap high-growth stock; RTX is a large-cap quality compounder stock; CWEN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; LMT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. RTX, CWEN, LMT pay a dividend while RNW, GE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.