Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Repay Holdings Corporation (RPAY) vs NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | NVDA | 65.5% revenue growth vs RPAY's 5.5% |
| Value | RPAY | Lower P/E (2.9x vs 21.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | NVDA | 55.6% net margin vs RPAY's -39.1% |
| Stability / Safety | RPAY | Beta 1.26 vs NVDA's 1.73 |
| Dividends | RPAY | 0.9% yield, vs NVDA's 0.0% |
| Momentum (1Y) | NVDA | +41.9% vs RPAY's -61.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | NVDA | 58.1% ROA vs RPAY's -9.1%, ROIC 81.8% vs -0.5% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Repay Holdings is a payment processing company that provides integrated electronic payment solutions to specialized industry verticals like personal loans, automotive loans, and receivables management. It generates revenue primarily from transaction fees — including credit/debit processing, ACH transfers, and instant funding — charged through its proprietary web, mobile, and text-to-pay channels. The company's competitive advantage lies in its deep vertical integration with industry-specific software platforms, creating embedded payment ecosystems that are difficult for general-purpose processors to replicate.
NVIDIA designs and sells graphics processing units (GPUs) and accelerated computing platforms that power artificial intelligence, gaming, and professional visualization applications. The company generates revenue primarily through its Data Center segment — which includes AI chips and systems — accounting for over 70% of sales, supplemented by its Gaming GPU business and professional visualization offerings. NVIDIA's competitive moat stems from its CUDA software ecosystem — which locks developers into its hardware architecture — and its years of architectural leadership in parallel processing for AI workloads.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). RPAY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
NVDA is the larger business by revenue, generating $215.9B annually — 698.9x RPAY's $309M. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 55.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RPAY's -39.1%. On growth, NVDA holds the edge at +73.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | RPAYRepay Holdings Co… | NVDANVIDIA Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $309M | $215.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$23M | $133.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$121M | $120.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $48M | $96.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.5% | +71.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -36.5% | +60.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -39.1% | +55.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.7% | +44.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.8% | +73.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.7% | +97.8% |
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, RPAY's 3.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NVDA's 32.3x.
| Metric | RPAYRepay Holdings Co… | NVDANVIDIA Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $278 | $4.31T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $319M | $4.31T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -25.27x | 36.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 2.94x | 21.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.38x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.32x | 32.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 19.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.32x | 27.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.00x | 44.54x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA delivers a 76.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $76 in annual profit, vs $-19 for RPAY. NVDA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RPAY's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RPAY scores 6/9 vs NVDA's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | RPAYRepay Holdings Co… | NVDANVIDIA Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -19.4% | +76.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.1% | +58.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.5% | +81.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.5% | +97.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.66x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $319M | $807M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $190M | $10.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $509M | $11.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -9.35x | 545.03x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $128,116 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,228 for RPAY. Over the past 12 months, NVDA leads with a +41.9% total return vs RPAY's -61.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 96.9% vs RPAY's -31.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | RPAYRepay Holdings Co… | NVDANVIDIA Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -23.2% | -6.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -61.4% | +41.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.2% | +663.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.7% | +1181.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.2% | +22525.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -31.0% | +96.9% |
Risk & Volatility
RPAY is the less volatile stock with a 1.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVDA's 1.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVDA currently trades 83.5% from its 52-week high vs RPAY's 37.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | RPAYRepay Holdings Co… | NVDANVIDIA Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.26x | 1.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.38 | $212.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.77 | $86.62 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +37.7% | +83.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.6 | 47.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 718K | 136.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates RPAY as "Buy" and NVDA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 187.8% upside for RPAY (target: $8) vs 52.9% for NVDA (target: $271). RPAY is the only dividend payer here at 0.94% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | RPAYRepay Holdings Co… | NVDANVIDIA Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.00 | $271.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 79 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.03 | $0.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +100.0% | +0.9% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Repay Holdings Corp… (RPAY) | 100 | 19.41 | -80.6% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 100 | 2,791.13 | +2691.1% |
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) returned +1.2K% over 5 years vs Repay Holdings Corp… (RPAY)'s -88%. A $10,000 investment in NVDA 5 years ago would be worth $128,116 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Repay Holdings Corp… (RPAY) | $94M | $313M | +233.2% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | $6.9B | $215.9B | +3025.0% |
NVIDIA Corporation's revenue grew from $6.9B (2017) to $215.9B (2026) — a 46.6% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Repay Holdings Corp… (RPAY) | 10.1% | -3.2% | -132.3% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 24.1% | 55.6% | +130.6% |
NVIDIA Corporation's net margin went from 24% (2017) to 56% (2026).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Repay Holdings Corp… (RPAY) | 209.7 | 67.1 | -68.0% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 75.6 | 36.2 | -52.1% |
Repay Holdings Corporation has traded in a 52x–210x P/E range over 3 years; current trailing P/E is ~-25x. NVIDIA Corporation has traded in a 28x–291x P/E range over 10 years; current trailing P/E is ~36x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Repay Holdings Corp… (RPAY) | 1.45 | -0.11 | -107.6% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 0.06 | 4.9 | +7556.3% |
NVIDIA Corporation's EPS grew from $0.06 (2017) to $4.90 (2026) — a 62% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Repay Holdings Corporation generated $105M FCF in 2024 (+253% vs 2021). NVIDIA Corporation generated $97B FCF in 2026 (+1960% vs 2021).
RPAY vs NVDA: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RPAY or NVDA a better buy right now?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) offers the better valuation at 36.2x trailing P/E (21.9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Repay Holdings Corporation (RPAY) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RPAY or NVDA?
On forward P/E, Repay Holdings Corporation is actually cheaper at 2.9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RPAY or NVDA?
Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1181%, compared to -87.7% for Repay Holdings Corporation (RPAY). A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth approximately $128K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +225.3% versus RPAY's -71.2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RPAY or NVDA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Repay Holdings Corporation (RPAY) is the lower-risk stock at 1.26β versus NVIDIA Corporation's 1.73β — meaning NVDA is approximately 37% more volatile than RPAY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 66% for Repay Holdings Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — RPAY or NVDA?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.6% net margin versus -3.2% for Repay Holdings Corporation — meaning it keeps 55.6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60.4% versus -2.5% for RPAY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RPAY leads at 77.1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is RPAY or NVDA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Repay Holdings Corporation (RPAY) trades at 2.9x forward P/E versus 21.9x for NVIDIA Corporation — 18.9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RPAY: 187.8% to $8.00.
07Which pays a better dividend — RPAY or NVDA?
In this comparison, RPAY (0.9% yield) pays a dividend. NVDA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is RPAY or NVDA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Repay Holdings Corporation (RPAY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.26), 0.9% yield). NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) carries a higher beta of 1.73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RPAY: -71.2%, NVDA: +225.3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between RPAY and NVDA?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. RPAY pays a dividend while NVDA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.