RRR vs MAR

For growth investors, Marriott International, Inc.

(MAR) is the stronger pick with 4. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 7% for Red Rock Resorts, Inc. (RRR). Red Rock Resorts, Inc. (RRR) offers the better valuation at 17. 0x trailing P/E (17. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Red Rock Resorts, Inc. (RRR) a "Buy" — based on 30 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Red Rock Resorts, Inc.

(RRR) is the cheapest at 17. 0x versus Marriott International, Inc. at 37. 8x. On forward P/E, Red Rock Resorts, Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 2x.

Over the past 5 years, Marriott International, Inc.

(MAR) delivered a total return of +157. 9%, compared to +70. 7% for Red Rock Resorts, Inc. (RRR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MAR returned +440. 0% versus RRR's +248. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Red Rock Resorts, Inc.

(RRR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 98β versus Marriott International, Inc. 's 1. 09β — meaning MAR is approximately 11% more volatile than RRR relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Marriott International, Inc.

(MAR) is pulling ahead at 4. 3% versus 3. 7% for Red Rock Resorts, Inc. (RRR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Red Rock Resorts, Inc. grew EPS 23. 3% year-over-year, compared to 13. 9% for Marriott International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MAR leads at 8. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Marriott International, Inc.

(MAR) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 9% net margin versus 9. 3% for Red Rock Resorts, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RRR leads at 29. 7% versus 15. 8% for MAR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RRR leads at 52. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Red Rock Resorts, Inc.

(RRR) trades at 17. 2x forward P/E versus 31. 0x for Marriott International, Inc. — 13. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RRR: 35. 0% to $71. 44.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Red Rock Resorts, Inc. (RRR) offers the highest yield at 2. 2%, versus 0. 7% for Marriott International, Inc. (MAR).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Marriott International, Inc.

(MAR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 09), 0. 7% yield, +440. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MAR: +440. 0%, RRR: +248. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: RRR is a small-cap deep-value stock; MAR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.