Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RSSS vs CODA vs INFU vs SPOK vs NRDY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Software - Application
RSSS vs CODA vs INFU vs SPOK vs NRDY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Aerospace & Defense | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $85M | $134M | $181M | $225M | $110M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $49M | $28M | $142M | $103M | $180M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $4M | $8M | $11M | $-33M |
| Gross Margin | 50.2% | 66.3% | 56.7% | 91.4% | 59.5% |
| Operating Margin | 6.9% | 17.4% | 9.1% | 13.2% | -13.2% |
| Forward P/E | 64.5x | 22.5x | 21.5x | 16.4x | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $395K | $3M | $7M | $19M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12M | $29M | $3M | $25M | $48M |
RSSS vs CODA vs INFU vs SPOK vs NRDY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research Solutions,… (RSSS) | 100 | 110.7 | +10.7% |
| Coda Octopus Group,… (CODA) | 100 | 212.9 | +112.9% |
| InfuSystem Holdings… (INFU) | 100 | 56.0 | -44.0% |
| Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK) | 100 | 110.2 | +10.2% |
| Nerdy, Inc. (NRDY) | 100 | 8.6 | -91.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RSSS vs CODA vs INFU vs SPOK vs NRDY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RSSS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 9.9%, EPS growth 130.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.2%
- 8.6% ROA vs NRDY's -45.7%, ROIC 51.4% vs -5.3%
CODA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 8.4% 10Y total return vs INFU's 159.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 8.86x
- Beta 1.00, current ratio 8.86x
- 30.7% revenue growth vs NRDY's -5.9%
INFU is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +88.6% vs NRDY's -46.6%
SPOK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.42, yield 11.9%
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 0.42 vs NRDY's 1.76, lower leverage
- 11.9% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Among these 5 stocks, NRDY doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.7% revenue growth vs NRDY's -5.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.8% margin vs NRDY's -18.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.42 vs NRDY's 1.76, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 11.9% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +88.6% vs NRDY's -46.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.6% ROA vs NRDY's -45.7%, ROIC 51.4% vs -5.3% |
RSSS vs CODA vs INFU vs SPOK vs NRDY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RSSS vs CODA vs INFU vs SPOK vs NRDY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CODA leads in 2 of 6 categories
RSSS leads 1 • SPOK leads 1 • INFU leads 0 • NRDY leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CODA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NRDY is the larger business by revenue, generating $180M annually — 6.4x CODA's $28M. CODA is the more profitable business, keeping 14.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NRDY's -18.6%. On growth, CODA holds the edge at +28.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $49M | $28M | $142M | $103M | $180M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | $6M | $23M | $17M | -$20M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | $4M | $8M | $11M | -$33M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $8M | $7M | $22M | $26M | -$20M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.2% | +66.3% | +56.7% | +91.4% | +59.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.9% | +17.4% | +9.1% | +13.2% | -13.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.9% | +14.8% | +5.6% | +10.3% | -18.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.5% | +24.6% | +15.4% | +24.7% | -10.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.0% | +28.8% | -3.0% | -100.0% | +2.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +126.6% | +3.0% | +6.0% | -64.0% | +66.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — INFU and SPOK and NRDY each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.4x trailing earnings, SPOK trades at a 78% valuation discount to RSSS's 64.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, INFU's 7.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RSSS's 19.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $85M | $134M | $181M | $225M | $110M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $73M | $106M | $181M | $206M | $81M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 64.50x | 32.16x | 28.90x | 14.44x | -2.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.45x | 21.54x | 16.41x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 7.51x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.40x | 17.85x | 7.19x | 8.91x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.73x | 5.05x | 1.26x | 1.61x | 0.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.68x | 2.30x | 3.30x | 1.56x | 3.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.12x | 22.20x | 7.59x | 8.91x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
RSSS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RSSS delivers a 26.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-93 for NRDY. CODA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NRDY's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INFU scores 8/9 vs NRDY's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +26.7% | +7.2% | +14.0% | +7.3% | -93.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.6% | +6.6% | +7.9% | +5.2% | -45.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +51.4% | +11.2% | +12.5% | +11.3% | -5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.2% | +8.1% | +14.3% | +12.1% | -60.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.01x | 0.06x | 0.05x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$12M | -$28M | $241,000 | -$18M | -$29M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12M | $29M | $3M | $25M | $48M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $394,932 | $3M | $7M | $19M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 13.65x | — | -26.36x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CODA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SPOK five years ago would be worth $16,194 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $865 for NRDY. Over the past 12 months, INFU leads with a +88.6% total return vs NRDY's -46.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CODA at 10.4% vs NRDY's -32.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.9% | +25.1% | +6.8% | -14.3% | -13.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -7.5% | +78.9% | +88.6% | -26.7% | -46.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.5% | +34.5% | +2.8% | +13.4% | -69.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.7% | +49.7% | -57.0% | +61.9% | -91.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +158.0% | +844.4% | +159.0% | +13.3% | -90.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.9% | +10.4% | +0.9% | +4.3% | -32.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — INFU and SPOK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SPOK is the less volatile stock with a 0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NRDY's 1.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INFU currently trades 81.2% from its 52-week high vs NRDY's 46.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.67x | 1.00x | 1.50x | 0.42x | 1.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.12 | $17.28 | $11.04 | $19.31 | $1.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.15 | $5.98 | $4.70 | $9.96 | $0.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +62.6% | +68.9% | +81.2% | +56.1% | +46.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.1 | 48.6 | 51.5 | 36.7 | 44.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 47K | 256K | 121K | 185K | 607K |
Analyst Outlook
SPOK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CODA as "Buy", INFU as "Buy", SPOK as "Hold", NRDY as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 67.4% upside for INFU (target: $15) vs 12.8% for NRDY (target: $1). SPOK is the only dividend payer here at 11.95% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $14.00 | $15.00 | $15.00 | $1.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 3 | 1 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +11.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | — | 5 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.29 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | 0.0% | +6.1% | +1.3% | 0.0% |
CODA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). RSSS leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
RSSS vs CODA vs INFU vs SPOK vs NRDY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RSSS or CODA or INFU or SPOK or NRDY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is the stronger pick with 30. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 9% for Nerdy, Inc. (NRDY). Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK) offers the better valuation at 14. 4x trailing P/E (16. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RSSS or CODA or INFU or SPOK or NRDY?
On trailing P/E, Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) is the cheapest at 14. 4x versus Research Solutions, Inc. at 64. 5x. On forward P/E, Spok Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RSSS or CODA or INFU or SPOK or NRDY?
Over the past 5 years, Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) delivered a total return of +61. 9%, compared to -91. 4% for Nerdy, Inc. (NRDY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CODA returned +844. 4% versus NRDY's -90. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RSSS or CODA or INFU or SPOK or NRDY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 42β versus Nerdy, Inc. 's 1. 76β — meaning NRDY is approximately 319% more volatile than SPOK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 67% for Nerdy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RSSS or CODA or INFU or SPOK or NRDY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is pulling ahead at 30. 7% versus -5. 9% for Nerdy, Inc. (NRDY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 181. 8% year-over-year, compared to 2. 7% for Spok Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RSSS leads at 14. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RSSS or CODA or INFU or SPOK or NRDY?
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 5% net margin versus -22. 3% for Nerdy, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CODA leads at 17. 1% versus -19. 3% for NRDY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPOK leads at 78. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RSSS or CODA or INFU or SPOK or NRDY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) trades at 16. 4x forward P/E versus 22. 5x for Coda Octopus Group, Inc. — 6. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INFU: 67. 4% to $15. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — RSSS or CODA or INFU or SPOK or NRDY?
In this comparison, SPOK (11.
9% yield) pays a dividend. RSSS, CODA, INFU, NRDY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RSSS or CODA or INFU or SPOK or NRDY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 42), 11. 9% yield). Nerdy, Inc. (NRDY) carries a higher beta of 1. 76 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SPOK: +13. 3%, NRDY: -90. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RSSS and CODA and INFU and SPOK and NRDY?
These companies operate in different sectors (RSSS (Technology) and CODA (Industrials) and INFU (Healthcare) and SPOK (Healthcare) and NRDY (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RSSS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CODA is a small-cap high-growth stock; INFU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPOK is a small-cap deep-value stock; NRDY is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SPOK pays a dividend while RSSS, CODA, INFU, NRDY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.