Solar
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
RUN vs XOM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Integrated
RUN vs XOM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Solar | Oil & Gas Integrated |
| Market Cap | $3.01B | $629.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.17B | $323.90B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $568M | $28.84B |
| Gross Margin | 23.5% | 21.7% |
| Operating Margin | -1.8% | 10.5% |
| Forward P/E | 21.2x | 15.0x |
| Total Debt | $14.89B | $43.54B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.24B | $10.68B |
RUN vs XOM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sunrun Inc. (RUN) | 100 | 76.8 | -23.2% |
| Exxon Mobil Corpora… (XOM) | 100 | 326.7 | +226.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RUN vs XOM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RUN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 45.1%, EPS growth 113.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.89, current ratio 1.66x
- Beta 2.89, current ratio 1.66x
XOM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 26 yrs, beta -0.15, yield 2.7%
- 107.4% 10Y total return vs RUN's 71.1%
- Lower P/E (15.0x vs 21.2x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 45.1% revenue growth vs XOM's -4.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.0x vs 21.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.9% margin vs XOM's 8.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (16.3% vs 298.7%) | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield; 26-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +81.7% vs XOM's +45.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs RUN's 2.5%, ROIC 8.6% vs -0.5% |
RUN vs XOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RUN vs XOM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RUN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $323.9B annually — 102.0x RUN's $3.2B. RUN is the more profitable business, keeping 17.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XOM's 8.9%. On growth, RUN holds the edge at +43.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.2B | $323.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $541M | $59.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $568M | $28.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$326M | $23.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.5% | +21.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.8% | +10.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.9% | +8.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -10.3% | +7.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +43.2% | -1.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | -11.0% |
Valuation Metrics
RUN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.5x trailing earnings, RUN trades at a 66% valuation discount to XOM's 22.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, XOM's 11.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RUN's 24.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.0B | $629.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $16.7B | $662.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.50x | 22.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.15x | 15.00x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 23.98x | 11.05x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.02x | 1.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.70x | 2.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 26.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
XOM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RUN delivers a 12.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $11 for XOM. XOM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RUN's 2.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RUN scores 6/9 vs XOM's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.4% | +10.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.5% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.5% | +8.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.6% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.99x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $13.6B | $32.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.2B | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14.9B | $43.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.02x | 69.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
XOM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in XOM five years ago would be worth $27,178 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,746 for RUN. Over the past 12 months, RUN leads with a +81.7% total return vs XOM's +45.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XOM at 13.7% vs RUN's -9.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -34.0% | +22.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +81.7% | +45.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.4% | +46.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.5% | +171.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +71.1% | +107.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -9.3% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
XOM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XOM is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RUN's 2.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. XOM currently trades 84.2% from its 52-week high vs RUN's 57.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.89x | -0.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.44 | $176.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.38 | $101.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +57.2% | +84.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.9 | 53.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10.2M | 18.8M |
Analyst Outlook
XOM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates RUN as "Buy" and XOM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 41.4% upside for RUN (target: $18) vs 8.0% for XOM (target: $160). XOM is the only dividend payer here at 2.69% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.14 | $160.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 36 | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 26 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $4.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.2% |
XOM leads in 4 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). RUN leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics).
RUN vs XOM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RUN or XOM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sunrun Inc.
(RUN) is the stronger pick with 45. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 5% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Sunrun Inc. (RUN) offers the better valuation at 7. 5x trailing P/E (21. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sunrun Inc. (RUN) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RUN or XOM?
On trailing P/E, Sunrun Inc.
(RUN) is the cheapest at 7. 5x versus Exxon Mobil Corporation at 22. 2x. On forward P/E, Exxon Mobil Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RUN or XOM?
Over the past 5 years, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) delivered a total return of +171.
8%, compared to -72. 5% for Sunrun Inc. (RUN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XOM returned +107. 4% versus RUN's +71. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RUN or XOM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
15β versus Sunrun Inc. 's 2. 89β — meaning RUN is approximately -2079% more volatile than XOM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 3% for Sunrun Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RUN or XOM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sunrun Inc.
(RUN) is pulling ahead at 45. 1% versus -4. 5% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sunrun Inc. grew EPS 113. 3% year-over-year, compared to -14. 5% for Exxon Mobil Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, RUN leads at 8. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RUN or XOM?
Sunrun Inc.
(RUN) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus 8. 9% for Exxon Mobil Corporation — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: XOM leads at 10. 5% versus -4. 3% for RUN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RUN leads at 26. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RUN or XOM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) trades at 15.
0x forward P/E versus 21. 2x for Sunrun Inc. — 6. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RUN: 41. 4% to $18. 14.
08Which pays a better dividend — RUN or XOM?
In this comparison, XOM (2.
7% yield) pays a dividend. RUN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RUN or XOM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
15), 2. 7% yield, +107. 4% 10Y return). Sunrun Inc. (RUN) carries a higher beta of 2. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (XOM: +107. 4%, RUN: +71. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RUN and XOM?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RUN is a small-cap high-growth stock; XOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock. XOM pays a dividend while RUN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.