Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RVMD vs BDTX vs KYMR vs NUVL vs ARVN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
RVMD vs BDTX vs KYMR vs NUVL vs ARVN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $30.30B | $155M | $6.91B | $7.53B | $652M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $70M | $51M | $0.00 | $263M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.37B | $21M | $-315M | $-450M | $-81M |
| Gross Margin | — | 99.9% | 33.2% | — | 99.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | 16.9% | -7.0% | — | -44.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.0x | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $159M | $15M | $82M | $0.00 | $9M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $384M | $21M | $357M | $262M | $143M |
RVMD vs BDTX vs KYMR vs NUVL vs ARVN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revolution Medicine… (RVMD) | 100 | 495.1 | +395.1% |
| Black Diamond Thera… (BDTX) | 100 | 31.3 | -68.7% |
| Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR) | 100 | 143.0 | +43.0% |
| Nuvalent, Inc. (NUVL) | 100 | 576.9 | +476.9% |
| Arvinas, Inc. (ARVN) | 100 | 10.0 | -90.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RVMD vs BDTX vs KYMR vs NUVL vs ARVN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RVMD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 1.08
- Lower volatility, beta 1.08, Low D/E 9.7%, current ratio 7.14x
- Beta 1.08 vs BDTX's 2.66, lower leverage
- +278.4% vs ARVN's +52.8%
BDTX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and quality.
- 130.0% revenue growth vs RVMD's -98.6%
- 30.7% margin vs KYMR's -6.1%
- 13.8% ROA vs RVMD's -59.1%, ROIC 10.7% vs -54.3%
KYMR plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
NUVL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.
- 446.1% 10Y total return vs RVMD's 393.1%
- Beta 1.09, current ratio 15.27x
ARVN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -0.3%, EPS growth 53.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 130.0% revenue growth vs RVMD's -98.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.7% margin vs KYMR's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.08 vs BDTX's 2.66, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +278.4% vs ARVN's +52.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.8% ROA vs RVMD's -59.1%, ROIC 10.7% vs -54.3% |
RVMD vs BDTX vs KYMR vs NUVL vs ARVN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
RVMD vs BDTX vs KYMR vs NUVL vs ARVN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BDTX leads in 2 of 6 categories
RVMD leads 1 • KYMR leads 0 • NUVL leads 0 • ARVN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BDTX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARVN and NUVL operate at a comparable scale, with $263M and $0 in trailing revenue. BDTX is the more profitable business, keeping 30.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KYMR's -6.1%. On growth, KYMR holds the edge at +55.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $70M | $51M | $0 | $263M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1.4B | $12M | -$352M | -$346M | -$111M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.4B | $21M | -$315M | -$450M | -$81M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1.1B | $21M | -$244M | -$313M | -$276M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +99.9% | +33.2% | — | +99.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +16.9% | -7.0% | — | -44.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +30.7% | -6.1% | — | -30.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +30.5% | -4.7% | — | -105.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +55.5% | — | -84.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -102.7% | +46.4% | +13.4% | -17.8% | -65.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — RVMD and BDTX and ARVN each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $30.3B | $155M | $6.9B | $7.5B | $652M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $30.1B | $149M | $6.6B | $7.3B | $517M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -23.95x | 6.97x | -22.93x | -17.50x | -7.96x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.60x | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — | 176.26x | — | 2.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 16.61x | 1.40x | 4.52x | 5.96x | 1.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 5.23x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BDTX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BDTX delivers a 17.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-83 for RVMD. ARVN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BDTX's 0.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BDTX scores 6/9 vs NUVL's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -83.2% | +17.8% | -25.0% | -42.8% | -14.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -59.1% | +13.8% | -22.3% | -37.8% | -9.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -54.3% | +10.7% | -24.9% | -32.5% | -22.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -53.0% | +10.9% | -27.2% | -34.4% | -16.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.13x | 0.05x | — | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$225M | -$6M | -$275M | -$262M | -$134M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $384M | $21M | $357M | $262M | $143M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $159M | $15M | $82M | $0 | $9M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -81.62x | — | -2119.53x | -26.85x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RVMD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NUVL five years ago would be worth $54,613 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,067 for BDTX. Over the past 12 months, RVMD leads with a +278.4% total return vs ARVN's +52.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RVMD at 80.0% vs ARVN's -25.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +80.3% | +9.2% | +16.3% | +1.5% | -11.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +278.4% | +75.5% | +190.7% | +53.5% | +52.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +483.1% | +41.7% | +205.1% | +171.2% | -58.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +382.1% | -89.3% | +92.1% | +446.1% | -84.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +393.1% | -93.1% | +154.4% | +446.1% | -36.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +80.0% | +12.3% | +45.0% | +39.5% | -25.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RVMD and ARVN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RVMD is the less volatile stock with a 1.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BDTX's 2.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RVMD currently trades 91.5% from its 52-week high vs BDTX's 55.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | 2.53x | 1.03x | 1.01x | 0.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $155.70 | $4.94 | $103.00 | $113.02 | $14.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $34.00 | $1.49 | $28.06 | $63.56 | $5.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.5% | +55.1% | +82.2% | +90.6% | +70.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.4 | 54.2 | 54.1 | 52.9 | 42.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.9M | 744K | 602K | 544K | 808K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RVMD as "Buy", BDTX as "Buy", KYMR as "Buy", NUVL as "Buy", ARVN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 194.1% upside for BDTX (target: $8) vs 10.7% for RVMD (target: $158).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $157.80 | $8.00 | $118.06 | $144.40 | $13.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 11 | 26 | 14 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +14.1% |
BDTX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RVMD leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
RVMD vs BDTX vs KYMR vs NUVL vs ARVN: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RVMD or BDTX or KYMR or NUVL or ARVN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arvinas, Inc.
(ARVN) is the stronger pick with -0. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). Black Diamond Therapeutics, Inc. (BDTX) offers the better valuation at 7. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Revolution Medicines, Inc. (RVMD) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — RVMD or BDTX or KYMR or NUVL or ARVN?
Over the past 5 years, Nuvalent, Inc.
(NUVL) delivered a total return of +446. 1%, compared to -89. 3% for Black Diamond Therapeutics, Inc. (BDTX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NUVL returned +461. 5% versus BDTX's -92. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — RVMD or BDTX or KYMR or NUVL or ARVN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Arvinas, Inc.
(ARVN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 99β versus Black Diamond Therapeutics, Inc. 's 2. 53β — meaning BDTX is approximately 157% more volatile than ARVN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arvinas, Inc. (ARVN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 13% for Black Diamond Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — RVMD or BDTX or KYMR or NUVL or ARVN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arvinas, Inc.
(ARVN) is pulling ahead at -0. 3% versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Black Diamond Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 130. 7% year-over-year, compared to -66. 2% for Revolution Medicines, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARVN leads at 26. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — RVMD or BDTX or KYMR or NUVL or ARVN?
Black Diamond Therapeutics, Inc.
(BDTX) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 7% net margin versus -794. 4% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BDTX leads at 16. 9% versus -891. 3% for KYMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KYMR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — RVMD or BDTX or KYMR or NUVL or ARVN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is RVMD or BDTX or KYMR or NUVL or ARVN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Nuvalent, Inc.
(NUVL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 01), +461. 5% 10Y return). Black Diamond Therapeutics, Inc. (BDTX) carries a higher beta of 2. 53 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NUVL: +461. 5%, BDTX: -92. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between RVMD and BDTX and KYMR and NUVL and ARVN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RVMD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BDTX is a small-cap deep-value stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NUVL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARVN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.