RVP
Retractable Technologies, Inc.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Market Cap$21M
5Y Perf.-87.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
RVP vs DBVT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
DBVT
DBV Technologies S.A.
Biotechnology
Market Cap$1712.35T
5Y Perf.-58.8%
RVP vs DBVT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | RVP | DBVT |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $21M | $1712.35T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $38M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $-168M |
| Gross Margin | -6.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -58.1% | — |
| Total Debt | $1M | $22M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $194M |
RVP vs DBVT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
RVP
DBVT
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Retractable Technol… (RVP) | 100 | 13.0 | -87.0% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 41.2 | -58.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RVP vs DBVT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: RVP leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. DBV Technologies S.A. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
RVP
Retractable Technologies, Inc.
The Income Pick
RVP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.72, yield 1.1%
- Rev growth -24.2%, EPS growth -66.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -44.0%
- -69.9% 10Y total return vs DBVT's -87.0%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
DBVT
DBV Technologies S.A.
The Quality Compounder
DBVT is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and momentum.
- 0.3% margin vs RVP's -22.9%
- +110.4% vs RVP's -6.3%
Best for: quality and momentum
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | RVP | -24.2% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% |
| Quality / Margins | DBVT | 0.3% margin vs RVP's -22.9% |
| Stability / Safety | RVP | Beta 0.72 vs DBVT's 1.26, lower leverage |
| Dividends | RVP | 1.1% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | DBVT | +110.4% vs RVP's -6.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | RVP | -5.9% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
RVP vs DBVT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
Segment breakdown not available.
RVP vs DBVT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLRVPLAGGINGDBVT
DBVTDBV Technologies S.A.
1leads
RVPRetractable Technolog…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs DBVTMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
RVP1/1
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
RVP2/2
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
RVP6/7
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
DBVT5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RVP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RVP and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $38M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | RVPRetractable Techn… | DBVTDBV Technologies … |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $38M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$15M | -$112M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | -$168M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$14M | -$151M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -6.9% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -58.1% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -22.9% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -35.5% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +73.2% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +99.0% | +91.5% |
RVP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
RVP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | RVPRetractable Techn… | DBVTDBV Technologies … |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21M | $1712.35T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $18M | $1712.35T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.76x | -0.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.64x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.24x | 0.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
RVP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RVP leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RVP delivers a -11.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-11 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. RVP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DBVT's 0.13x.
| Metric | RVPRetractable Techn… | DBVTDBV Technologies … |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -11.4% | -130.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.9% | -89.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -18.4% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -13.1% | -145.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | -$172M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $194M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $22M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -81.41x | -189.82x |
RVP leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DBVT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DBVT five years ago would be worth $3,090 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $712 for RVP. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +110.4% total return vs RVP's -6.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DBVT at 6.2% vs RVP's -23.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | RVPRetractable Techn… | DBVTDBV Technologies … |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.2% | +4.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -6.3% | +110.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.4% | +19.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.9% | -69.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.9% | -87.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -23.6% | +6.2% |
DBVT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RVP and DBVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RVP is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DBVT's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DBVT currently trades 76.3% from its 52-week high vs RVP's 61.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | RVPRetractable Techn… | DBVTDBV Technologies … |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.72x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.14 | $26.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.60 | $7.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.8% | +76.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.3 | 48.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 57K | 252K |
Evenly matched — RVP and DBVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
RVP is the only dividend payer here at 1.09% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | RVPRetractable Techn… | DBVTDBV Technologies … |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.01 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
RVP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). DBVT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
Best OverallRetractable Technologies, I… (RVP)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
RVP vs DBVT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RVP or DBVT a better buy right now?
Analysts rate DBV Technologies S.
A. (DBVT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — RVP or DBVT?
Over the past 5 years, DBV Technologies S.
A. (DBVT) delivered a total return of -69. 1%, compared to -92. 9% for Retractable Technologies, Inc. (RVP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RVP returned -69. 9% versus DBVT's -87. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — RVP or DBVT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Retractable Technologies, Inc.
(RVP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 72β versus DBV Technologies S. A. 's 1. 26β — meaning DBVT is approximately 76% more volatile than RVP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Retractable Technologies, Inc. (RVP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 13% for DBV Technologies S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — RVP or DBVT?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Retractable Technologies, Inc.
grew EPS -66. 7% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — RVP or DBVT?
DBV Technologies S.
A. (DBVT) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -36. 0% for Retractable Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DBVT leads at 0. 0% versus -63. 9% for RVP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DBVT leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — RVP or DBVT?
In this comparison, RVP (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. DBVT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is RVP or DBVT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Retractable Technologies, Inc.
(RVP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 72), 1. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RVP: -69. 9%, DBVT: -87. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between RVP and DBVT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
RVP pays a dividend while DBVT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.