Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RXRX vs INVA vs PRGO vs SDGR vs RLAY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Biotechnology
RXRX vs INVA vs PRGO vs SDGR vs RLAY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1.48B | $1.69B | $1.62B | $981M | $2.41B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $66M | $424M | $4.18B | $255M | $11M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-560M | $504M | $-1.82B | $-103M | $-273M |
| Gross Margin | -34.4% | 76.2% | 34.2% | 55.3% | 66.3% |
| Operating Margin | -8.8% | 14.8% | -4.1% | -64.7% | -27.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.3x | 5.5x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $78M | $269M | $3.97B | $109M | $32M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $743M | $551M | $532M | $231M | $84M |
RXRX vs INVA vs PRGO vs SDGR vs RLAY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recursion Pharmaceu… (RXRX) | 100 | 9.9 | -90.1% |
| Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) | 100 | 199.9 | +99.9% |
| Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) | 100 | 28.1 | -71.9% |
| Schrödinger, Inc. (SDGR) | 100 | 17.2 | -82.8% |
| Relay Therapeutics,… (RLAY) | 100 | 40.2 | -59.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RXRX vs INVA vs PRGO vs SDGR vs RLAY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RXRX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
INVA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 95.6% 10Y total return vs RLAY's -63.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.11, Low D/E 22.9%, current ratio 14.64x
- Beta 0.11, current ratio 14.64x
- 118.9% margin vs RLAY's -25.5%
PRGO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 1.21, yield 9.8%
- Better valuation composite
- 9.8% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Among these 5 stocks, SDGR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
RLAY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 53.4%, EPS growth 31.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 123.2%
- 53.4% revenue growth vs PRGO's -2.8%
- +325.3% vs PRGO's -52.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 53.4% revenue growth vs PRGO's -2.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 118.9% margin vs RLAY's -25.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.11 vs RXRX's 2.99 | |
| Dividends | 9.8% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +325.3% vs PRGO's -52.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 32.4% ROA vs RXRX's -40.6%, ROIC 14.2% vs -95.8% |
RXRX vs INVA vs PRGO vs SDGR vs RLAY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RXRX vs INVA vs PRGO vs SDGR vs RLAY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
INVA leads in 4 of 6 categories
PRGO leads 2 • RXRX leads 0 • SDGR leads 0 • RLAY leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INVA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRGO is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.2B annually — 391.3x RLAY's $11M. INVA is the more profitable business, keeping 118.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RLAY's -25.5%. On growth, INVA holds the edge at +10.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $66M | $424M | $4.2B | $255M | $11M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$501M | $86M | $58M | -$159M | -$298M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$560M | $504M | -$1.8B | -$103M | -$273M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$326M | $181M | $108M | -$148M | -$213M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -34.4% | +76.2% | +34.2% | +55.3% | +66.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -8.8% | +14.8% | -4.1% | -64.7% | -27.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.4% | +118.9% | -43.5% | -40.6% | -25.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.9% | +42.6% | +2.6% | -58.2% | -20.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -56.1% | +10.6% | -7.2% | -1.6% | -60.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +56.0% | +4.0% | -56.4% | +1.2% | +10.9% |
Valuation Metrics
PRGO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, INVA's 6.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PRGO's 7.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $1.7B | $1.6B | $981M | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $819M | $1.4B | $5.1B | $860M | $2.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.31x | 6.94x | -1.14x | -9.31x | -7.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.31x | 5.53x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.67x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.90x | 7.43x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 19.88x | 3.97x | 0.38x | 3.83x | 157.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.31x | 1.65x | 0.55x | 2.65x | 3.86x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.63x | 11.17x | 78.76x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
INVA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INVA delivers a 47.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $-54 for RXRX. RLAY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PRGO's 1.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INVA scores 5/9 vs SDGR's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -54.3% | +47.6% | -50.7% | -30.8% | -43.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -40.6% | +32.4% | -19.8% | -15.3% | -40.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -95.8% | +14.2% | +3.7% | -39.4% | -37.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -50.1% | +12.4% | +4.3% | -28.6% | -42.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.23x | 1.35x | 0.30x | 0.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$665M | -$282M | $3.4B | -$121M | -$52M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $743M | $551M | $532M | $231M | $84M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $78M | $269M | $4.0B | $109M | $32M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -342.92x | 63.45x | -7.20x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INVA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in INVA five years ago would be worth $19,448 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,441 for RXRX. Over the past 12 months, RLAY leads with a +325.3% total return vs PRGO's -52.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INVA at 25.1% vs PRGO's -25.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -21.0% | +15.2% | -13.6% | -27.0% | +56.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -24.4% | +23.2% | -52.0% | -45.0% | +325.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.7% | +96.0% | -58.1% | -52.7% | +17.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.6% | +94.5% | -60.3% | -79.5% | -54.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.6% | +95.6% | -77.7% | -54.2% | -63.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.0% | +25.1% | -25.2% | -22.1% | +5.7% |
Risk & Volatility
INVA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
INVA is the less volatile stock with a 0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RXRX's 2.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INVA currently trades 91.0% from its 52-week high vs PRGO's 41.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.99x | 0.11x | 1.21x | 1.65x | 1.77x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.18 | $25.15 | $28.44 | $27.63 | $17.31 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.80 | $16.52 | $9.23 | $10.95 | $2.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +46.2% | +91.0% | +41.2% | +47.5% | +73.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.4 | 44.7 | 53.1 | 62.7 | 43.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 12.5M | 604K | 3.3M | 1.3M | 3.1M |
Analyst Outlook
PRGO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RXRX as "Hold", INVA as "Buy", PRGO as "Hold", SDGR as "Buy", RLAY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 231.3% upside for RXRX (target: $11) vs 37.1% for SDGR (target: $18). PRGO is the only dividend payer here at 9.82% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.00 | $40.00 | $36.20 | $18.00 | $21.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 10 | 36 | 12 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +9.8% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 10 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.15 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
INVA leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PRGO leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
RXRX vs INVA vs PRGO vs SDGR vs RLAY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RXRX or INVA or PRGO or SDGR or RLAY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Relay Therapeutics, Inc.
(RLAY) is the stronger pick with 53. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 8% for Perrigo Company plc (PRGO). Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) offers the better valuation at 6. 9x trailing P/E (7. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RXRX or INVA or PRGO or SDGR or RLAY?
On forward P/E, Perrigo Company plc is actually cheaper at 5.
5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RXRX or INVA or PRGO or SDGR or RLAY?
Over the past 5 years, Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) delivered a total return of +94. 5%, compared to -85. 6% for Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RXRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INVA returned +95. 6% versus RXRX's -81. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RXRX or INVA or PRGO or SDGR or RLAY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 11β versus Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 2. 99β — meaning RXRX is approximately 2532% more volatile than INVA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Relay Therapeutics, Inc. (RLAY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 135% for Perrigo Company plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RXRX or INVA or PRGO or SDGR or RLAY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Relay Therapeutics, Inc.
(RLAY) is pulling ahead at 53. 4% versus -2. 8% for Perrigo Company plc (PRGO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Innoviva, Inc. grew EPS 816. 7% year-over-year, compared to -723. 2% for Perrigo Company plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, RLAY leads at 123. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RXRX or INVA or PRGO or SDGR or RLAY?
Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the more profitable company, earning 63. 8% net margin versus -1800. 6% for Relay Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 63. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INVA leads at 38. 5% versus -1971. 6% for RLAY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RLAY leads at 76. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RXRX or INVA or PRGO or SDGR or RLAY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) trades at 5.
5x forward P/E versus 7. 3x for Innoviva, Inc. — 1. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RXRX: 231. 3% to $11. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — RXRX or INVA or PRGO or SDGR or RLAY?
In this comparison, PRGO (9.
8% yield) pays a dividend. RXRX, INVA, SDGR, RLAY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RXRX or INVA or PRGO or SDGR or RLAY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 11)). Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RXRX) carries a higher beta of 2. 99 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (INVA: +95. 6%, RXRX: -81. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RXRX and INVA and PRGO and SDGR and RLAY?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RXRX is a small-cap high-growth stock; INVA is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRGO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SDGR is a small-cap high-growth stock; RLAY is a small-cap high-growth stock. PRGO pays a dividend while RXRX, INVA, SDGR, RLAY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.