Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
RYDE vs GRAB vs UBER vs LYFT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Application
RYDE vs GRAB vs UBER vs LYFT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $24M | $15.06B | $157.92B | $5.51B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $14M | $3.55B | $53.69B | $6.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-19M | $379M | $8.54B | $2.86B |
| Gross Margin | -38.0% | 43.5% | 41.0% | 43.2% |
| Operating Margin | -82.2% | 5.7% | 11.7% | -2.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 34.6x | 22.8x | 23.8x |
| Total Debt | $135K | $2.05B | $13.47B | $1.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $3.43B | $7.74B | $1.13B |
RYDE vs GRAB vs UBER vs LYFT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ryde Group Ltd. (RYDE) | 100 | 30.0 | -70.0% |
| Grab Holdings Limit… (GRAB) | 100 | 120.7 | +20.7% |
| Uber Technologies, … (UBER) | 100 | 99.7 | -0.3% |
| Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) | 100 | 73.2 | -26.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RYDE vs GRAB vs UBER vs LYFT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RYDE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +404.1% vs GRAB's -21.7%
GRAB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 20.5%, EPS growth 342.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.42, Low D/E 30.4%, current ratio 1.75x
- 20.5% revenue growth vs RYDE's 3.3%
UBER has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.09
- 84.6% 10Y total return vs GRAB's -68.1%
- Beta 1.09, current ratio 1.14x
- Lower P/E (22.8x vs 34.6x)
LYFT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 43.8% margin vs RYDE's -136.6%
- 39.1% ROA vs RYDE's -255.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.5% revenue growth vs RYDE's 3.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (22.8x vs 34.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 43.8% margin vs RYDE's -136.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.09 vs RYDE's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +404.1% vs GRAB's -21.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 39.1% ROA vs RYDE's -255.5% |
RYDE vs GRAB vs UBER vs LYFT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RYDE vs GRAB vs UBER vs LYFT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
UBER leads in 3 of 6 categories
LYFT leads 1 • RYDE leads 0 • GRAB leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GRAB and UBER each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UBER is the larger business by revenue, generating $53.7B annually — 3950.4x RYDE's $14M. LYFT is the more profitable business, keeping 43.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RYDE's -136.6%. On growth, RYDE holds the edge at +162.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $14M | $3.6B | $53.7B | $6.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | $395M | $7.0B | -$63M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$19M | $379M | $8.5B | $2.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$12M | -$88M | $9.8B | $1.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -38.0% | +43.5% | +41.0% | +43.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -82.2% | +5.7% | +11.7% | -2.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -136.6% | +10.7% | +15.9% | +43.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -89.2% | -2.5% | +18.3% | +17.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +162.7% | +23.5% | +14.5% | +13.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +57.2% | +2.1% | -84.3% | — |
Valuation Metrics
LYFT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.1x trailing earnings, LYFT trades at a 97% valuation discount to GRAB's 59.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, UBER's 25.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GRAB's 36.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $24M | $15.1B | $157.9B | $5.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $19M | $13.7B | $163.7B | $5.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.60x | 59.50x | 16.22x | 2.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 34.64x | 22.78x | 23.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 36.09x | 25.93x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.34x | 4.47x | 3.04x | 0.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.73x | 2.36x | 5.79x | 1.81x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 112.36x | 16.18x | 4.94x |
Profitability & Efficiency
UBER leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LYFT delivers a 150.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $150 in annual profit, vs $-8 for RYDE. RYDE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UBER's 0.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UBER scores 7/9 vs LYFT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.2% | +5.8% | +32.0% | +150.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.6% | +3.3% | +14.2% | +39.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +3.3% | +13.6% | -6.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.7% | +2.9% | +12.5% | -6.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.30x | 0.48x | 0.39x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | -$1.4B | $5.7B | $145M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $3.4B | $7.7B | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $135,000 | $2.1B | $13.5B | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -43.54x | 2.96x | 11.51x | -4.75x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
UBER leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UBER five years ago would be worth $16,315 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,775 for RYDE. Over the past 12 months, RYDE leads with a +404.1% total return vs GRAB's -21.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UBER at 25.5% vs RYDE's -34.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +330.2% | -25.4% | -7.4% | -28.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +404.1% | -21.7% | -8.3% | +12.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.3% | +13.5% | +97.6% | +65.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.2% | -67.5% | +63.2% | -71.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.3% | -68.1% | +84.6% | -81.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -34.8% | +4.3% | +25.5% | +18.4% |
Risk & Volatility
UBER leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
UBER is the less volatile stock with a 1.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RYDE's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UBER currently trades 75.2% from its 52-week high vs LYFT's 55.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.51x | 1.42x | 1.09x | 1.29x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.55 | $6.62 | $101.99 | $25.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.16 | $3.48 | $68.46 | $12.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.6% | +57.3% | +75.2% | +55.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.0 | 46.6 | 62.3 | 52.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.2M | 48.1M | 15.9M | 15.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GRAB as "Buy", UBER as "Buy", LYFT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 76.8% upside for GRAB (target: $7) vs 35.7% for LYFT (target: $19).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $6.70 | $104.88 | $19.21 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 61 | 59 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.8% | +4.1% | +9.1% |
UBER leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). LYFT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
RYDE vs GRAB vs UBER vs LYFT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RYDE or GRAB or UBER or LYFT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) is the stronger pick with 20.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 3% for Ryde Group Ltd. (RYDE). Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) offers the better valuation at 2. 1x trailing P/E (23. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RYDE or GRAB or UBER or LYFT?
On trailing P/E, Lyft, Inc.
(LYFT) is the cheapest at 2. 1x versus Grab Holdings Limited at 59. 5x. On forward P/E, Uber Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 22. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RYDE or GRAB or UBER or LYFT?
Over the past 5 years, Uber Technologies, Inc.
(UBER) delivered a total return of +63. 2%, compared to -72. 2% for Ryde Group Ltd. (RYDE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UBER returned +84. 6% versus LYFT's -81. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RYDE or GRAB or UBER or LYFT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Uber Technologies, Inc.
(UBER) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 09β versus Ryde Group Ltd. 's 1. 51β — meaning RYDE is approximately 39% more volatile than UBER relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ryde Group Ltd. (RYDE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 48% for Uber Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RYDE or GRAB or UBER or LYFT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) is pulling ahead at 20.
5% versus 3. 3% for Ryde Group Ltd. (RYDE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lyft, Inc. grew EPS 122. 6% year-over-year, compared to -31. 3% for Ryde Group Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GRAB leads at 33. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RYDE or GRAB or UBER or LYFT?
Lyft, Inc.
(LYFT) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 0% net margin versus -208. 4% for Ryde Group Ltd. — meaning it keeps 45. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UBER leads at 10. 7% versus -207. 8% for RYDE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GRAB leads at 43. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RYDE or GRAB or UBER or LYFT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Uber Technologies, Inc.
(UBER) trades at 22. 8x forward P/E versus 34. 6x for Grab Holdings Limited — 11. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GRAB: 76. 8% to $6. 70.
08Which pays a better dividend — RYDE or GRAB or UBER or LYFT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is RYDE or GRAB or UBER or LYFT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Uber Technologies, Inc.
(UBER) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 09)). Ryde Group Ltd. (RYDE) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UBER: +84. 6%, RYDE: -72. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RYDE and GRAB and UBER and LYFT?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RYDE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GRAB is a mid-cap high-growth stock; UBER is a mid-cap high-growth stock; LYFT is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.