Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

RYDE vs UBER vs LYFT vs GRAB vs BLNK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
RYDE
Ryde Group Ltd.

Software - Application

TechnologyAMEX • SG
Market Cap$24M
5Y Perf.-70.0%
UBER
Uber Technologies, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$157.92B
5Y Perf.-0.3%
LYFT
Lyft, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.51B
5Y Perf.-26.8%
GRAB
Grab Holdings Limited

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • SG
Market Cap$15.06B
5Y Perf.+20.7%
BLNK
Blink Charging Co.

Engineering & Construction

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$91M
5Y Perf.-73.6%

RYDE vs UBER vs LYFT vs GRAB vs BLNK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
RYDE logoRYDE
UBER logoUBER
LYFT logoLYFT
GRAB logoGRAB
BLNK logoBLNK
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationSoftware - ApplicationSoftware - ApplicationSoftware - ApplicationEngineering & Construction
Market Cap$24M$157.92B$5.51B$15.06B$91M
Revenue (TTM)$14M$53.69B$6.52B$3.55B$106M
Net Income (TTM)$-19M$8.54B$2.86B$379M$-126M
Gross Margin-38.0%41.0%43.2%43.5%26.0%
Operating Margin-82.2%11.7%-2.5%5.7%-119.5%
Forward P/E22.8x23.8x34.6x
Total Debt$135K$13.47B$1.28B$2.05B$11M
Cash & Equiv.$6M$7.74B$1.13B$3.43B$42M

RYDE vs UBER vs LYFT vs GRAB vs BLNKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

RYDE
UBER
LYFT
GRAB
BLNK
StockMar 24May 26Return
Ryde Group Ltd. (RYDE)10030.0-70.0%
Uber Technologies, … (UBER)10099.7-0.3%
Lyft, Inc. (LYFT)10073.2-26.8%
Grab Holdings Limit… (GRAB)100120.7+20.7%
Blink Charging Co. (BLNK)10026.4-73.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: RYDE vs UBER vs LYFT vs GRAB vs BLNK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: UBER and LYFT are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Lyft, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. RYDE and GRAB also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
RYDE
Ryde Group Ltd.
The Momentum Pick

RYDE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +404.1% vs GRAB's -21.7%
Best for: momentum
UBER
Uber Technologies, Inc.
The Income Pick

UBER has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • beta 1.09
  • 84.6% 10Y total return vs GRAB's -68.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.09, Low D/E 48.0%, current ratio 1.14x
  • Beta 1.09, current ratio 1.14x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
LYFT
Lyft, Inc.
The Quality Compounder

LYFT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.

  • 43.8% margin vs RYDE's -136.6%
  • 39.1% ROA vs RYDE's -255.5%
Best for: quality and efficiency
GRAB
Grab Holdings Limited
The Growth Play

GRAB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 20.5%, EPS growth 342.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.0%
  • 20.5% revenue growth vs BLNK's -11.2%
Best for: growth exposure
BLNK
Blink Charging Co.
The Industrials Pick

Among these 5 stocks, BLNK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: industrials exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthGRAB logoGRAB20.5% revenue growth vs BLNK's -11.2%
ValueUBER logoUBERBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsLYFT logoLYFT43.8% margin vs RYDE's -136.6%
Stability / SafetyUBER logoUBERBeta 1.09 vs BLNK's 2.96
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)RYDE logoRYDE+404.1% vs GRAB's -21.7%
Efficiency (ROA)LYFT logoLYFT39.1% ROA vs RYDE's -255.5%

RYDE vs UBER vs LYFT vs GRAB vs BLNK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

RYDERyde Group Ltd.
FY 2024
Mobility
89.7%$6M
Membership
8.9%$575,000
Others
1.3%$87,000
UBERUber Technologies, Inc.
FY 2025
Mobility
57.0%$29.7B
Delivery
33.2%$17.2B
Freight
9.8%$5.1B
LYFTLyft, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

GRABGrab Holdings Limited
FY 2025
Deliveries
53.5%$1.8B
Mobility
36.2%$1.2B
Financial Services
10.3%$347M
BLNKBlink Charging Co.
FY 2024
Product
57.7%$82M
Service
15.1%$21M
Host Provider Fees
9.1%$13M
Network
6.2%$9M
Warranty
4.5%$6M
Depreciation and Amortization
4.4%$6M
Warranty And Repairs And Maintenance
1.8%$3M
Other (1)
1.1%$2M

RYDE vs UBER vs LYFT vs GRAB vs BLNK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLUBERLAGGINGBLNK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — UBER and GRAB each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

UBER is the larger business by revenue, generating $53.7B annually — 3950.4x RYDE's $14M. LYFT is the more profitable business, keeping 43.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RYDE's -136.6%. On growth, RYDE holds the edge at +162.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricRYDE logoRYDERyde Group Ltd.UBER logoUBERUber Technologies…LYFT logoLYFTLyft, Inc.GRAB logoGRABGrab Holdings Lim…BLNK logoBLNKBlink Charging Co.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$14M$53.7B$6.5B$3.6B$106M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$10M$7.0B-$63M$395M-$115M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$19M$8.5B$2.9B$379M-$126M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$12M$9.8B$1.2B-$88M-$47M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-38.0%+41.0%+43.2%+43.5%+26.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-82.2%+11.7%-2.5%+5.7%-119.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-136.6%+15.9%+43.8%+10.7%-118.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-89.2%+18.3%+17.7%-2.5%-44.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+162.7%+14.5%+13.8%+23.5%+11.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+57.2%-84.3%+2.1%+99.9%
Evenly matched — UBER and GRAB each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — UBER and BLNK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 2.1x trailing earnings, LYFT trades at a 97% valuation discount to GRAB's 59.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, UBER's 25.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GRAB's 36.1x.

MetricRYDE logoRYDERyde Group Ltd.UBER logoUBERUber Technologies…LYFT logoLYFTLyft, Inc.GRAB logoGRABGrab Holdings Lim…BLNK logoBLNKBlink Charging Co.
Market CapShares × price$24M$157.9B$5.5B$15.1B$91M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$19M$163.7B$5.7B$13.7B$60M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.60x16.22x2.08x59.50x-0.40x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.22.78x23.75x34.64x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple25.93x36.09x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.34x3.04x0.87x4.47x0.73x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share7.73x5.79x1.81x2.36x0.67x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF16.18x4.94x112.36x
Evenly matched — UBER and BLNK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

UBER leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

LYFT delivers a 150.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $150 in annual profit, vs $-8 for RYDE. RYDE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UBER's 0.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UBER scores 7/9 vs BLNK's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricRYDE logoRYDERyde Group Ltd.UBER logoUBERUber Technologies…LYFT logoLYFTLyft, Inc.GRAB logoGRABGrab Holdings Lim…BLNK logoBLNKBlink Charging Co.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-8.2%+32.0%+150.2%+5.8%-131.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-2.6%+14.2%+39.1%+3.3%-66.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+13.6%-6.1%+3.3%-109.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-4.7%+12.5%-6.2%+2.9%-77.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–957443
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.03x0.48x0.39x0.30x0.09x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$5M$5.7B$145M-$1.4B-$31M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$6M$7.7B$1.1B$3.4B$42M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$135,000$13.5B$1.3B$2.1B$11M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-43.54x11.51x-4.75x2.96x-9064.60x
UBER leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

UBER leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in UBER five years ago would be worth $16,315 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $244 for BLNK. Over the past 12 months, RYDE leads with a +404.1% total return vs GRAB's -21.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UBER at 25.5% vs BLNK's -51.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricRYDE logoRYDERyde Group Ltd.UBER logoUBERUber Technologies…LYFT logoLYFTLyft, Inc.GRAB logoGRABGrab Holdings Lim…BLNK logoBLNKBlink Charging Co.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+330.2%-7.4%-28.4%-25.4%+7.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+404.1%-8.3%+12.5%-21.7%+4.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-72.3%+97.6%+65.8%+13.5%-88.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-72.2%+63.2%-71.7%-67.5%-97.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-72.3%+84.6%-81.9%-68.1%-97.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-34.8%+25.5%+18.4%+4.3%-51.9%
UBER leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

UBER leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

UBER is the less volatile stock with a 1.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLNK's 2.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UBER currently trades 75.2% from its 52-week high vs BLNK's 29.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricRYDE logoRYDERyde Group Ltd.UBER logoUBERUber Technologies…LYFT logoLYFTLyft, Inc.GRAB logoGRABGrab Holdings Lim…BLNK logoBLNKBlink Charging Co.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.51x1.09x1.29x1.42x2.96x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$1.55$101.99$25.54$6.62$2.65
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.16$68.46$12.31$3.48$0.45
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+71.6%+75.2%+55.4%+57.3%+29.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10051.062.352.046.666.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded3.2M15.9M15.2M48.1M2.1M
UBER leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: UBER as "Buy", LYFT as "Hold", GRAB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 76.8% upside for GRAB (target: $7) vs 35.7% for LYFT (target: $19).

MetricRYDE logoRYDERyde Group Ltd.UBER logoUBERUber Technologies…LYFT logoLYFTLyft, Inc.GRAB logoGRABGrab Holdings Lim…BLNK logoBLNKBlink Charging Co.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$104.88$19.21$6.70
# AnalystsCovering analysts615912
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+4.1%+9.1%+1.8%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

UBER leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency and Total Returns. 2 categories are tied.

Best OverallUber Technologies, Inc. (UBER)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

RYDE vs UBER vs LYFT vs GRAB vs BLNK: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is RYDE or UBER or LYFT or GRAB or BLNK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) is the stronger pick with 20.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 2% for Blink Charging Co. (BLNK). Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) offers the better valuation at 2. 1x trailing P/E (23. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — RYDE or UBER or LYFT or GRAB or BLNK?

On trailing P/E, Lyft, Inc.

(LYFT) is the cheapest at 2. 1x versus Grab Holdings Limited at 59. 5x. On forward P/E, Uber Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 22. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — RYDE or UBER or LYFT or GRAB or BLNK?

Over the past 5 years, Uber Technologies, Inc.

(UBER) delivered a total return of +63. 2%, compared to -97. 6% for Blink Charging Co. (BLNK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UBER returned +84. 6% versus BLNK's -97. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — RYDE or UBER or LYFT or GRAB or BLNK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Uber Technologies, Inc.

(UBER) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 09β versus Blink Charging Co. 's 2. 96β — meaning BLNK is approximately 172% more volatile than UBER relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ryde Group Ltd. (RYDE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 48% for Uber Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — RYDE or UBER or LYFT or GRAB or BLNK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) is pulling ahead at 20.

5% versus -11. 2% for Blink Charging Co. (BLNK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lyft, Inc. grew EPS 122. 6% year-over-year, compared to -31. 3% for Ryde Group Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BLNK leads at 82. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — RYDE or UBER or LYFT or GRAB or BLNK?

Lyft, Inc.

(LYFT) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 0% net margin versus -208. 4% for Ryde Group Ltd. — meaning it keeps 45. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UBER leads at 10. 7% versus -207. 8% for RYDE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GRAB leads at 43. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is RYDE or UBER or LYFT or GRAB or BLNK more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Uber Technologies, Inc.

(UBER) trades at 22. 8x forward P/E versus 34. 6x for Grab Holdings Limited — 11. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GRAB: 76. 8% to $6. 70.

08

Which pays a better dividend — RYDE or UBER or LYFT or GRAB or BLNK?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is RYDE or UBER or LYFT or GRAB or BLNK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Uber Technologies, Inc.

(UBER) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 09)). Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) carries a higher beta of 2. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UBER: +84. 6%, BLNK: -97. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between RYDE and UBER and LYFT and GRAB and BLNK?

These companies operate in different sectors (RYDE (Technology) and UBER (Technology) and LYFT (Technology) and GRAB (Technology) and BLNK (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: RYDE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; UBER is a mid-cap high-growth stock; LYFT is a small-cap deep-value stock; GRAB is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BLNK is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

RYDE

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 81%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

UBER

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LYFT

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 26%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GRAB

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BLNK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform RYDE and UBER and LYFT and GRAB and BLNK on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(RYDE: 162.7% · UBER: 14.5%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.