Insurance - Diversified
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
RZC vs JEF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
RZC vs JEF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Diversified | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $1.70B | $10.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $23.41B | $10.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.18B | $819M |
| Gross Margin | 16.8% | 59.7% |
| Operating Margin | 6.6% | 6.3% |
| Forward P/E | 1.4x | 14.7x |
| Total Debt | $5.71B | $1.77B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4.17B | $14.04B |
RZC vs JEF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.125% Fixed-Rate R… (RZC) | 100 | 100.2 | +0.2% |
| Jefferies Financial… (JEF) | 100 | 156.5 | +56.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RZC vs JEF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RZC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 14.2%
- Rev growth 3.4%, EPS growth 64.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 42.1%
JEF is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 300.2% 10Y total return vs RZC's 25.3%
- 6.6% margin vs RZC's 5.0%
- +8.9% vs RZC's +4.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.4% revenue growth vs JEF's 2.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.4x vs 14.7x), PEG 0.06 vs 11.15 | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.6% margin vs RZC's 5.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs JEF's 1.97 | |
| Dividends | 14.2% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs JEF's 3.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.9% vs RZC's +4.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.1% ROA vs RZC's 0.8%, ROIC 2.4% vs 8.3% |
RZC vs JEF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RZC vs JEF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RZC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RZC is the larger business by revenue, generating $23.4B annually — 2.2x JEF's $10.8B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 6.6% (JEF) to 5.0% (RZC).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $23.4B | $10.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.9B | $24M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.2B | $819M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4.1B | $911M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.8% | +59.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.6% | +6.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | +6.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.5% | +3.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.9% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | -8.6% |
Valuation Metrics
RZC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.4x trailing earnings, RZC trades at a 92% valuation discount to JEF's 18.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), RZC offers better value at 0.06x vs JEF's 13.75x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $10.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.2B | -$1.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1.43x | 18.19x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.06x | 13.75x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.05x | -1.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.07x | 0.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.12x | 1.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.42x | 31.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RZC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RZC delivers a 9.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $8 for JEF. JEF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RZC's 0.42x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RZC scores 7/9 vs JEF's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.4% | +7.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.3% | +2.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.1% | +1.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.42x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.5B | -$12.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4.2B | $14.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.7B | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.21x | 0.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JEF leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JEF five years ago would be worth $17,863 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,535 for RZC. Over the past 12 months, JEF leads with a +8.9% total return vs RZC's +4.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JEF at 22.6% vs RZC's 6.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.2% | -18.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.3% | +8.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.4% | +84.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.3% | +78.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.3% | +300.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.1% | +22.6% |
Risk & Volatility
RZC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RZC is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JEF's 1.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RZC currently trades 96.5% from its 52-week high vs JEF's 72.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.12x | 1.97x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.29 | $71.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.01 | $35.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.5% | +72.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.0 | 70.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 91K | 2.8M |
Analyst Outlook
RZC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, RZC offers the higher dividend yield at 14.18% vs JEF's 3.26%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $67.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +14.2% | +3.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 18 | 9 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.60 | $1.68 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +10.2% | +0.6% |
RZC leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). JEF leads in 1 (Total Returns).
RZC vs JEF: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RZC or JEF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, 7.
125% Fixed-Rate Reset Subordinated Debentures due 2052 (RZC) is the stronger pick with 3. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 9% for Jefferies Financial Group Inc. (JEF). 7. 125% Fixed-Rate Reset Subordinated Debentures due 2052 (RZC) offers the better valuation at 1. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Jefferies Financial Group Inc. (JEF) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RZC or JEF?
On trailing P/E, 7.
125% Fixed-Rate Reset Subordinated Debentures due 2052 (RZC) is the cheapest at 1. 4x versus Jefferies Financial Group Inc. at 18. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RZC or JEF?
Over the past 5 years, Jefferies Financial Group Inc.
(JEF) delivered a total return of +78. 6%, compared to +25. 3% for 7. 125% Fixed-Rate Reset Subordinated Debentures due 2052 (RZC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JEF returned +300. 2% versus RZC's +25. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RZC or JEF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), 7.
125% Fixed-Rate Reset Subordinated Debentures due 2052 (RZC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus Jefferies Financial Group Inc. 's 1. 97β — meaning JEF is approximately 1562% more volatile than RZC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Jefferies Financial Group Inc. (JEF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 42% for 7. 125% Fixed-Rate Reset Subordinated Debentures due 2052 — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RZC or JEF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), 7.
125% Fixed-Rate Reset Subordinated Debentures due 2052 (RZC) is pulling ahead at 3. 4% versus 2. 9% for Jefferies Financial Group Inc. (JEF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: 7. 125% Fixed-Rate Reset Subordinated Debentures due 2052 grew EPS 64. 9% year-over-year, compared to -5. 4% for Jefferies Financial Group Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RZC or JEF?
Jefferies Financial Group Inc.
(JEF) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 6% net margin versus 5. 2% for 7. 125% Fixed-Rate Reset Subordinated Debentures due 2052 — meaning it keeps 6. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RZC leads at 6. 8% versus 6. 3% for JEF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JEF leads at 59. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — RZC or JEF?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
7. 125% Fixed-Rate Reset Subordinated Debentures due 2052 (RZC) offers the highest yield at 14. 2%, versus 3. 3% for Jefferies Financial Group Inc. (JEF).
08Is RZC or JEF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, 7.
125% Fixed-Rate Reset Subordinated Debentures due 2052 (RZC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 14. 2% yield). Jefferies Financial Group Inc. (JEF) carries a higher beta of 1. 97 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RZC: +25. 3%, JEF: +300. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between RZC and JEF?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RZC is a small-cap deep-value stock; JEF is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.