Travel Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SABR vs MAR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Travel Lodging
SABR vs MAR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Travel Services | Travel Lodging |
| Market Cap | $723M | $95.15B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.85B | $21.73B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $525M | $2.58B |
| Gross Margin | 43.6% | 6.0% |
| Operating Margin | 12.6% | 19.6% |
| Forward P/E | 1.4x | 31.0x |
| Total Debt | $4.45B | $17.08B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $792M | $358M |
SABR vs MAR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sabre Corporation (SABR) | 100 | 26.3 | -73.7% |
| Marriott Internatio… (MAR) | 100 | 405.7 | +305.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SABR vs MAR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SABR is the clearest fit if your priority is value and quality.
- Lower P/E (1.4x vs 31.0x)
- 18.4% margin vs MAR's 11.9%
- 11.7% ROA vs MAR's 10.5%, ROIC 9.7% vs 25.0%
MAR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.09, yield 0.7%
- Rev growth 4.3%, EPS growth 13.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.0%
- 440.0% 10Y total return vs SABR's -80.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.3% revenue growth vs SABR's -8.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.4x vs 31.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.4% margin vs MAR's 11.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.09 vs SABR's 1.99 | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.6% vs SABR's -25.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.7% ROA vs MAR's 10.5%, ROIC 9.7% vs 25.0% |
SABR vs MAR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SABR vs MAR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SABR and MAR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAR is the larger business by revenue, generating $21.7B annually — 7.6x SABR's $2.8B. SABR is the more profitable business, keeping 18.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MAR's 11.9%. On growth, SABR holds the edge at -6.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.8B | $21.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $464M | $4.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $525M | $2.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$213M | $3.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.6% | +6.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | +19.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.4% | +11.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.5% | +14.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.7% | -71.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -36.8% | +110.6% |
Valuation Metrics
SABR leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.4x trailing earnings, SABR trades at a 96% valuation discount to MAR's 37.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SABR's 9.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MAR's 25.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $723M | $95.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.4B | $111.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1.37x | 37.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 31.00x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.60x | 25.20x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.26x | 3.63x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 36.48x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MAR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MAR scores 7/9 vs SABR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.7% | +10.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.7% | +25.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.3% | +22.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.7B | $16.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $792M | $358M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.5B | $17.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.63x | 8.06x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MAR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MAR five years ago would be worth $25,790 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,786 for SABR. Over the past 12 months, MAR leads with a +43.6% total return vs SABR's -25.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MAR at 27.2% vs SABR's -2.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +37.6% | +14.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -25.3% | +43.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.1% | +105.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.1% | +157.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.2% | +440.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.4% | +27.2% |
Risk & Volatility
MAR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MAR is the less volatile stock with a 1.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SABR's 1.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MAR currently trades 94.5% from its 52-week high vs SABR's 52.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.99x | 1.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.52 | $380.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.81 | $250.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +52.0% | +94.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.9 | 50.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8.2M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
MAR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SABR as "Buy" and MAR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 9.3% upside for SABR (target: $2) vs 3.7% for MAR (target: $373). MAR is the only dividend payer here at 0.74% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.00 | $372.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.67 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.5% |
MAR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). SABR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SABR vs MAR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SABR or MAR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Marriott International, Inc.
(MAR) is the stronger pick with 4. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 5% for Sabre Corporation (SABR). Sabre Corporation (SABR) offers the better valuation at 1. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sabre Corporation (SABR) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SABR or MAR?
On trailing P/E, Sabre Corporation (SABR) is the cheapest at 1.
4x versus Marriott International, Inc. at 37. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SABR or MAR?
Over the past 5 years, Marriott International, Inc.
(MAR) delivered a total return of +157. 9%, compared to -72. 1% for Sabre Corporation (SABR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MAR returned +440. 0% versus SABR's -80. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SABR or MAR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Marriott International, Inc.
(MAR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 09β versus Sabre Corporation's 1. 99β — meaning SABR is approximately 82% more volatile than MAR relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — SABR or MAR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Marriott International, Inc.
(MAR) is pulling ahead at 4. 3% versus -8. 5% for Sabre Corporation (SABR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sabre Corporation grew EPS 283. 6% year-over-year, compared to 13. 9% for Marriott International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MAR leads at 8. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SABR or MAR?
Sabre Corporation (SABR) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
9% net margin versus 9. 9% for Marriott International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MAR leads at 15. 8% versus 12. 7% for SABR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SABR leads at 56. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SABR or MAR more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SABR: 9.
3% to $2. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SABR or MAR?
In this comparison, MAR (0.
7% yield) pays a dividend. SABR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SABR or MAR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Marriott International, Inc.
(MAR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 09), 0. 7% yield, +440. 0% 10Y return). Sabre Corporation (SABR) carries a higher beta of 1. 99 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MAR: +440. 0%, SABR: -80. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SABR and MAR?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SABR is a small-cap deep-value stock; MAR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. MAR pays a dividend while SABR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare MAR vs HLT
HLT is one of the most direct listed alternatives to MAR.
Compare SABR vs BKNG
BKNG overlaps with SABR in an adjacent operating segment worth comparing.
Expand With HLT + BKNG
HLT and BKNG are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.