REIT - Diversified
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SAFE vs PINE vs NNN vs ADC vs O
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
SAFE vs PINE vs NNN vs ADC vs O — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $1.11B | $281M | $8.47B | $9.17B | $57.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $386M | $65M | $936M | $750M | $5.92B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $114M | $-415K | $387M | $220M | $800M |
| Gross Margin | 97.7% | -4.1% | 81.4% | 87.6% | 68.6% |
| Operating Margin | 39.8% | 28.0% | 63.3% | 48.0% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 9.1x | 59.3x | 21.7x | 38.9x | 37.1x |
| Total Debt | $4.49B | $394M | $4.82B | $3.35B | $32.85B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $22M | $5M | $5M | $16M | $435M |
SAFE vs PINE vs NNN vs ADC vs O — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safehold Inc. (SAFE) | 100 | 28.1 | -71.9% |
| Alpine Income Prope… (PINE) | 100 | 158.8 | +58.8% |
| NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) | 100 | 141.8 | +41.8% |
| Agree Realty Corpor… (ADC) | 100 | 121.6 | +21.6% |
| Realty Income Corpo… (O) | 100 | 115.4 | +15.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SAFE vs PINE vs NNN vs ADC vs O
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SAFE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 1.44 vs NNN's 1.94
- Lower P/E (9.1x vs 37.1x), PEG 1.44 vs 71.28
PINE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +37.3% vs SAFE's +1.1%
NNN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.
- 41.4% margin vs PINE's -0.6%
- 5.3% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs O's 5.2%
- 4.1% ROA vs PINE's -0.1%, ROIC 4.8% vs 2.2%
ADC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 16.4%, EPS growth -0.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.7%
- 135.6% 10Y total return vs PINE's 38.3%
- 16.4% FFO/revenue growth vs SAFE's 5.4%
O is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.09, yield 5.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.09, Low D/E 81.9%, current ratio 0.51x
- Beta 0.09, yield 5.2%, current ratio 0.51x
- Beta 0.09 vs SAFE's 0.96, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.4% FFO/revenue growth vs SAFE's 5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.1x vs 37.1x), PEG 1.44 vs 71.28 | |
| Quality / Margins | 41.4% margin vs PINE's -0.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.09 vs SAFE's 0.96, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.3% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs O's 5.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.3% vs SAFE's +1.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.1% ROA vs PINE's -0.1%, ROIC 4.8% vs 2.2% |
SAFE vs PINE vs NNN vs ADC vs O — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SAFE vs PINE vs NNN vs ADC vs O — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SAFE leads in 1 of 6 categories
NNN leads 1 • PINE leads 1 • ADC leads 0 • O leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PINE and NNN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
O is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.9B annually — 91.4x PINE's $65M. NNN is the more profitable business, keeping 41.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PINE's -0.6%. On growth, PINE holds the edge at +29.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $386M | $65M | $936M | $750M | $5.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $163M | $45M | $867M | $638M | $4.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $114M | -$415,000 | $387M | $220M | $800M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $48M | -$46M | $464M | $110M | $4.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +97.7% | -4.1% | +81.4% | +87.6% | +68.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +39.8% | +28.0% | +63.3% | +48.0% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +29.7% | -0.6% | +41.4% | +29.3% | +13.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.4% | -71.7% | +49.6% | +14.7% | +67.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.5% | +29.6% | +4.1% | +18.7% | +12.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.3% | +185.7% | -2.0% | +19.0% | -103.6% |
Valuation Metrics
SAFE leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.7x trailing earnings, SAFE trades at a 82% valuation discount to O's 52.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SAFE offers better value at 1.53x vs ADC's 113.70x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $281M | $8.5B | $9.2B | $57.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.6B | $671M | $13.3B | $12.5B | $90.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.70x | -89.27x | 21.50x | 43.12x | 52.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.09x | 59.32x | 21.69x | 38.94x | 37.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.53x | — | 1.93x | 113.70x | 71.28x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.64x | 14.63x | 15.85x | 20.30x | 21.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.87x | 4.65x | 9.14x | 12.76x | 10.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.45x | 1.01x | 1.90x | 1.35x | 1.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 23.16x | — | 12.69x | 18.18x | 14.91x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NNN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NNN delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-0 for PINE. ADC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.53x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SAFE's 1.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ADC scores 5/9 vs PINE's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.7% | -0.1% | +8.8% | +3.7% | +2.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | -0.1% | +4.1% | +2.3% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.4% | +2.2% | +4.8% | +2.8% | +1.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.4% | +2.8% | +6.4% | +3.8% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.84x | 1.31x | 1.09x | 0.53x | 0.82x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.5B | $390M | $4.8B | $3.3B | $32.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $22M | $5M | $5M | $16M | $435M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.5B | $394M | $4.8B | $3.4B | $32.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.57x | 0.82x | 2.93x | 2.54x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PINE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PINE five years ago would be worth $14,124 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,904 for SAFE. Over the past 12 months, PINE leads with a +37.3% total return vs SAFE's +1.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PINE at 13.6% vs SAFE's -14.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.4% | +18.8% | +15.6% | +7.3% | +9.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.1% | +37.3% | +12.4% | +4.3% | +14.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.3% | +46.6% | +15.1% | +26.1% | +13.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.0% | +41.2% | +15.0% | +29.3% | +16.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.3% | +38.3% | +37.8% | +135.6% | +45.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -14.4% | +13.6% | +4.8% | +8.0% | +4.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NNN and ADC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ADC is the less volatile stock with a -0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SAFE's 0.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NNN currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs SAFE's 89.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.96x | 0.33x | 0.15x | -0.14x | 0.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.16 | $20.80 | $46.03 | $82.08 | $67.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.76 | $13.10 | $38.90 | $69.56 | $54.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.9% | +94.4% | +96.7% | +93.0% | +90.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.8 | 54.0 | 58.4 | 46.8 | 53.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 333K | 176K | 1.5M | 1.1M | 5.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NNN and O each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SAFE as "Buy", PINE as "Buy", NNN as "Hold", ADC as "Buy", O as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 9.4% upside for ADC (target: $84) vs -9.2% for SAFE (target: $14). For income investors, NNN offers the higher dividend yield at 5.30% vs PINE's 0.18%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.00 | $20.75 | $46.06 | $83.50 | $65.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 12 | 29 | 32 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.6% | +0.2% | +5.3% | +4.0% | +5.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.71 | $0.04 | $2.36 | $3.06 | $3.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.1% | 0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% |
SAFE leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). NNN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
SAFE vs PINE vs NNN vs ADC vs O: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SAFE or PINE or NNN or ADC or O a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) is the stronger pick with 16.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 4% for Safehold Inc. (SAFE). Safehold Inc. (SAFE) offers the better valuation at 9. 7x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Safehold Inc. (SAFE) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SAFE or PINE or NNN or ADC or O?
On trailing P/E, Safehold Inc.
(SAFE) is the cheapest at 9. 7x versus Realty Income Corporation at 52. 8x. On forward P/E, Safehold Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Safehold Inc. wins at 1. 44x versus Agree Realty Corporation's 113. 70x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SAFE or PINE or NNN or ADC or O?
Over the past 5 years, Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.
(PINE) delivered a total return of +41. 2%, compared to -71. 0% for Safehold Inc. (SAFE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ADC returned +135. 6% versus SAFE's -50. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SAFE or PINE or NNN or ADC or O?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
14β versus Safehold Inc. 's 0. 96β — meaning SAFE is approximately -792% more volatile than ADC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 53% versus 184% for Safehold Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SAFE or PINE or NNN or ADC or O?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) is pulling ahead at 16.
4% versus 5. 4% for Safehold Inc. (SAFE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Realty Income Corporation grew EPS 19. 4% year-over-year, compared to -257. 1% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, O leads at 19. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SAFE or PINE or NNN or ADC or O?
NNN REIT, Inc.
(NNN) is the more profitable company, earning 42. 1% net margin versus -4. 4% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 42. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SAFE leads at 79. 8% versus 28. 3% for O. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SAFE leads at 94. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SAFE or PINE or NNN or ADC or O more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Safehold Inc. (SAFE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 44x versus Agree Realty Corporation's 113. 70x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Safehold Inc. (SAFE) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 59. 3x for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. — 50. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ADC: 9. 4% to $83. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — SAFE or PINE or NNN or ADC or O?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) offers the highest yield at 5. 3%, versus 0. 2% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE).
09Is SAFE or PINE or NNN or ADC or O better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
14), 4. 0% yield, +135. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ADC: +135. 6%, SAFE: -50. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SAFE and PINE and NNN and ADC and O?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SAFE is a small-cap deep-value stock; PINE is a small-cap high-growth stock; NNN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ADC is a small-cap high-growth stock; O is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. SAFE, NNN, ADC, O pay a dividend while PINE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.