Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SAH vs TM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SAH
Sonic Automotive, Inc.

Auto - Dealerships

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.69B
5Y Perf.+200.6%
TM
Toyota Motor Corporation

Auto - Manufacturers

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • JP
Market Cap$254.22B
5Y Perf.+54.8%

SAH vs TM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SAH logoSAH
TM logoTM
IndustryAuto - DealershipsAuto - Manufacturers
Market Cap$2.69B$254.22B
Revenue (TTM)$15.15B$49.39T
Net Income (TTM)$119M$4.63T
Gross Margin14.6%18.0%
Operating Margin3.6%8.8%
Forward P/E12.2x0.1x
Total Debt$4.23B$38.79T
Cash & Equiv.$6M$8.98T

SAH vs TMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SAH
TM
StockMay 20May 26Return
Sonic Automotive, I… (SAH)100300.6+200.6%
Toyota Motor Corpor… (TM)100154.8+54.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SAH vs TM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SAH leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. Toyota Motor Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SAH
Sonic Automotive, Inc.
The Income Pick

SAH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 1.05, yield 1.8%
  • Rev growth 6.5%, EPS growth -44.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.7%
  • 387.7% 10Y total return vs TM's 132.7%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
TM
Toyota Motor Corporation
The Defensive Pick

TM is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.

  • Beta 1.06, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.26x
  • Lower P/E (0.1x vs 12.2x)
  • 9.4% margin vs SAH's 0.8%
Best for: defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSAH logoSAH6.5% revenue growth vs TM's 6.5%
ValueTM logoTMLower P/E (0.1x vs 12.2x)
Quality / MarginsTM logoTM9.4% margin vs SAH's 0.8%
Stability / SafetySAH logoSAHBeta 1.05 vs TM's 1.06
DividendsSAH logoSAH1.8% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs TM's 2.8%
Momentum (1Y)SAH logoSAH+28.1% vs TM's +2.9%
Efficiency (ROA)TM logoTM4.7% ROA vs SAH's 2.0%, ROIC 5.6% vs 7.8%

SAH vs TM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SAHSonic Automotive, Inc.
FY 2025
New Vehicle
32.2%$7.1B
Retail New Vehicles
31.7%$7.0B
UsedVehiclesMember
21.9%$4.9B
Parts, Service and Collision Repair
9.1%$2.0B
Finance, Insurance, And Other, Net
3.6%$799M
Wholesale Vehicles
1.4%$314M
TMToyota Motor Corporation
FY 2025
Vehicles
76.8%$36.89T
Financial Services
9.2%$4.44T
Parts and components for after service
7.1%$3.42T
Parts and components for production
3.3%$1.61T
Other
2.2%$1.07T
All Other
1.3%$602.6B

SAH vs TM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSAHLAGGINGTM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

TM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

TM is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.39T annually — 3259.0x SAH's $15.2B. TM is the more profitable business, keeping 9.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SAH's 0.8%. On growth, TM holds the edge at +8.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSAH logoSAHSonic Automotive,…TM logoTMToyota Motor Corp…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$15.2B$49.39T
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$705M$6.59T
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$119M$4.63T
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$425M$147.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+14.6%+18.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+3.6%+8.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+0.8%+9.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+2.8%+0.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-0.6%+8.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-18.6%+65.7%
TM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 8.5x trailing earnings, TM trades at a 63% valuation discount to SAH's 23.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SAH's 9.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TM's 9.9x.

MetricSAH logoSAHSonic Automotive,…TM logoTMToyota Motor Corp…
Market CapShares × price$2.7B$254.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$6.9B$445.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS23.10x8.47x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.20x0.07x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.42x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.80x9.86x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.18x0.83x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.57x1.08x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF6.43x
TM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SAH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

TM delivers a 12.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $11 for SAH. TM carries lower financial leverage with a 1.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SAH's 3.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SAH scores 6/9 vs TM's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricSAH logoSAHSonic Automotive,…TM logoTMToyota Motor Corp…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+11.2%+12.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.0%+4.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.8%+5.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+16.3%+7.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage3.96x1.05x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$4.2B$29.81T
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$6M$8.98T
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$4.2B$38.79T
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.89x38.49x
SAH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SAH leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SAH five years ago would be worth $16,162 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,192 for TM. Over the past 12 months, SAH leads with a +28.1% total return vs TM's +2.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SAH at 27.3% vs TM's 14.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSAH logoSAHSonic Automotive,…TM logoTMToyota Motor Corp…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+28.8%-10.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+28.1%+2.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+106.3%+51.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+61.6%+41.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+387.7%+132.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+27.3%+14.8%
SAH leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

SAH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

SAH is the less volatile stock with a 1.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TM's 1.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SAH currently trades 88.1% from its 52-week high vs TM's 78.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSAH logoSAHSonic Automotive,…TM logoTMToyota Motor Corp…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.05x1.06x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$89.62$248.90
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$54.11$167.18
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+88.1%+78.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10070.232.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded308K336K
SAH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — SAH and TM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates SAH as "Hold" and TM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -8.0% upside for TM (target: $179) vs -14.8% for SAH (target: $67). For income investors, TM offers the higher dividend yield at 2.83% vs SAH's 1.78%.

MetricSAH logoSAHSonic Automotive,…TM logoTMToyota Motor Corp…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$67.33$179.41
# AnalystsCovering analysts1616
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.8%+2.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises104
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.41$863.50
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+3.1%+3.0%
Evenly matched — SAH and TM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

SAH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). TM leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallSonic Automotive, Inc. (SAH)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SAH vs TM: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SAH or TM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Sonic Automotive, Inc.

(SAH) is the stronger pick with 6. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 5% for Toyota Motor Corporation (TM). Toyota Motor Corporation (TM) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (0. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sonic Automotive, Inc. (SAH) a "Hold" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SAH or TM?

On trailing P/E, Toyota Motor Corporation (TM) is the cheapest at 8.

5x versus Sonic Automotive, Inc. at 23. 1x. On forward P/E, Toyota Motor Corporation is actually cheaper at 0. 1x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SAH or TM?

Over the past 5 years, Sonic Automotive, Inc.

(SAH) delivered a total return of +61. 6%, compared to +41. 9% for Toyota Motor Corporation (TM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SAH returned +387. 7% versus TM's +132. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SAH or TM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sonic Automotive, Inc.

(SAH) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 05β versus Toyota Motor Corporation's 1. 06β — meaning TM is approximately 0% more volatile than SAH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Toyota Motor Corporation (TM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 105% versus 4% for Sonic Automotive, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SAH or TM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sonic Automotive, Inc.

(SAH) is pulling ahead at 6. 5% versus 6. 5% for Toyota Motor Corporation (TM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Toyota Motor Corporation grew EPS -1. 7% year-over-year, compared to -44. 7% for Sonic Automotive, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TM leads at 15. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SAH or TM?

Toyota Motor Corporation (TM) is the more profitable company, earning 9.

9% net margin versus 0. 8% for Sonic Automotive, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TM leads at 10. 0% versus 3. 6% for SAH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TM leads at 19. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SAH or TM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Toyota Motor Corporation (TM) trades at 0.

1x forward P/E versus 12. 2x for Sonic Automotive, Inc. — 12. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TM: -8. 0% to $179. 41.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SAH or TM?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Toyota Motor Corporation (TM) offers the highest yield at 2. 8%, versus 1. 8% for Sonic Automotive, Inc. (SAH).

09

Is SAH or TM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Sonic Automotive, Inc.

(SAH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 05), 1. 8% yield, +387. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SAH: +387. 7%, TM: +132. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SAH and TM?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SAH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

SAH

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TM

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SAH and TM on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SAH: -0.6% · TM: 8.2%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(SAH: 23.1x · TM: 8.5x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.