Auto - Dealerships
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SAH vs TM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Manufacturers
SAH vs TM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Dealerships | Auto - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $2.69B | $254.22B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15.15B | $49.39T |
| Net Income (TTM) | $119M | $4.63T |
| Gross Margin | 14.6% | 18.0% |
| Operating Margin | 3.6% | 8.8% |
| Forward P/E | 12.2x | 0.1x |
| Total Debt | $4.23B | $38.79T |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $8.98T |
SAH vs TM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sonic Automotive, I… (SAH) | 100 | 300.6 | +200.6% |
| Toyota Motor Corpor… (TM) | 100 | 154.8 | +54.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SAH vs TM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SAH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 1.05, yield 1.8%
- Rev growth 6.5%, EPS growth -44.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.7%
- 387.7% 10Y total return vs TM's 132.7%
TM is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.06, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.26x
- Lower P/E (0.1x vs 12.2x)
- 9.4% margin vs SAH's 0.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.5% revenue growth vs TM's 6.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.1x vs 12.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.4% margin vs SAH's 0.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.05 vs TM's 1.06 | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs TM's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.1% vs TM's +2.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs SAH's 2.0%, ROIC 5.6% vs 7.8% |
SAH vs TM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SAH vs TM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TM is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.39T annually — 3259.0x SAH's $15.2B. TM is the more profitable business, keeping 9.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SAH's 0.8%. On growth, TM holds the edge at +8.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $15.2B | $49.39T |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $705M | $6.59T |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $119M | $4.63T |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $425M | $147.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.6% | +18.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | +8.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.8% | +9.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.6% | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -18.6% | +65.7% |
Valuation Metrics
TM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.5x trailing earnings, TM trades at a 63% valuation discount to SAH's 23.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SAH's 9.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TM's 9.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.7B | $254.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.9B | $445.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.10x | 8.47x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.20x | 0.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.42x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.80x | 9.86x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.18x | 0.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.57x | 1.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.43x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SAH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TM delivers a 12.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $11 for SAH. TM carries lower financial leverage with a 1.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SAH's 3.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SAH scores 6/9 vs TM's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.2% | +12.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.8% | +5.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.3% | +7.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.96x | 1.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.2B | $29.81T |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $8.98T |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.2B | $38.79T |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.89x | 38.49x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SAH leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SAH five years ago would be worth $16,162 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,192 for TM. Over the past 12 months, SAH leads with a +28.1% total return vs TM's +2.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SAH at 27.3% vs TM's 14.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +28.8% | -10.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +28.1% | +2.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +106.3% | +51.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.6% | +41.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +387.7% | +132.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.3% | +14.8% |
Risk & Volatility
SAH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SAH is the less volatile stock with a 1.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TM's 1.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SAH currently trades 88.1% from its 52-week high vs TM's 78.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.05x | 1.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $89.62 | $248.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $54.11 | $167.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.1% | +78.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.2 | 32.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 308K | 336K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SAH and TM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SAH as "Hold" and TM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -8.0% upside for TM (target: $179) vs -14.8% for SAH (target: $67). For income investors, TM offers the higher dividend yield at 2.83% vs SAH's 1.78%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $67.33 | $179.41 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.8% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 10 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.41 | $863.50 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.1% | +3.0% |
SAH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). TM leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SAH vs TM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SAH or TM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sonic Automotive, Inc.
(SAH) is the stronger pick with 6. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 5% for Toyota Motor Corporation (TM). Toyota Motor Corporation (TM) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (0. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sonic Automotive, Inc. (SAH) a "Hold" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SAH or TM?
On trailing P/E, Toyota Motor Corporation (TM) is the cheapest at 8.
5x versus Sonic Automotive, Inc. at 23. 1x. On forward P/E, Toyota Motor Corporation is actually cheaper at 0. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SAH or TM?
Over the past 5 years, Sonic Automotive, Inc.
(SAH) delivered a total return of +61. 6%, compared to +41. 9% for Toyota Motor Corporation (TM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SAH returned +387. 7% versus TM's +132. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SAH or TM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sonic Automotive, Inc.
(SAH) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 05β versus Toyota Motor Corporation's 1. 06β — meaning TM is approximately 0% more volatile than SAH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Toyota Motor Corporation (TM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 105% versus 4% for Sonic Automotive, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SAH or TM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sonic Automotive, Inc.
(SAH) is pulling ahead at 6. 5% versus 6. 5% for Toyota Motor Corporation (TM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Toyota Motor Corporation grew EPS -1. 7% year-over-year, compared to -44. 7% for Sonic Automotive, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TM leads at 15. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SAH or TM?
Toyota Motor Corporation (TM) is the more profitable company, earning 9.
9% net margin versus 0. 8% for Sonic Automotive, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TM leads at 10. 0% versus 3. 6% for SAH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TM leads at 19. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SAH or TM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Toyota Motor Corporation (TM) trades at 0.
1x forward P/E versus 12. 2x for Sonic Automotive, Inc. — 12. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TM: -8. 0% to $179. 41.
08Which pays a better dividend — SAH or TM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Toyota Motor Corporation (TM) offers the highest yield at 2. 8%, versus 1. 8% for Sonic Automotive, Inc. (SAH).
09Is SAH or TM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sonic Automotive, Inc.
(SAH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 05), 1. 8% yield, +387. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SAH: +387. 7%, TM: +132. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SAH and TM?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SAH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.