Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SAMG vs VRTS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SAMG
Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$56M
5Y Perf.+21.6%
VRTS
Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$949M
5Y Perf.+52.5%

SAMG vs VRTS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SAMG logoSAMG
VRTS logoVRTS
IndustryAsset ManagementAsset Management
Market Cap$56M$949M
Revenue (TTM)$125M$831M
Net Income (TTM)$14M$138M
Gross Margin33.0%74.9%
Operating Margin7.4%17.4%
Forward P/E11.9x5.5x
Total Debt$24M$2.84B
Cash & Equiv.$44M$477M

SAMG vs VRTSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SAMG
VRTS
StockMay 20May 26Return
Silvercrest Asset M… (SAMG)100121.6+21.6%
Virtus Investment P… (VRTS)100152.5+52.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SAMG vs VRTS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SAMG leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SAMG
Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.
The Banking Pick

SAMG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 5.9%
  • Rev growth 1.3%, EPS growth -44.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 28.2%, current ratio 13.97x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
VRTS
Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.
The Banking Pick

VRTS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and bank quality.

  • 142.6% 10Y total return vs SAMG's 61.1%
  • NIM 0.9% vs SAMG's 0.4%
  • Lower P/E (5.5x vs 11.9x)
Best for: long-term compounding and bank quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSAMG logoSAMG1.3% NII/revenue growth vs VRTS's -8.0%
ValueVRTS logoVRTSLower P/E (5.5x vs 11.9x)
Quality / MarginsSAMG logoSAMGEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs VRTS's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetySAMG logoSAMGBeta 0.83 vs VRTS's 1.14, lower leverage
DividendsVRTS logoVRTS6.6% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs SAMG's 5.9%
Momentum (1Y)VRTS logoVRTS-5.5% vs SAMG's -8.2%
Efficiency (ROA)SAMG logoSAMGEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs VRTS's 0.6%

SAMG vs VRTS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SAMGSilvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.
FY 2020
Family Office Services
100.0%$4M
VRTSVirtus Investment Partners, Inc.
FY 2025
Investment Management Fees
50.0%$725M
Open End Funds
19.8%$287M
Retail Separate Accounts
14.5%$210M
Institutional Accounts
11.6%$168M
Closed End Funds
4.2%$61M

SAMG vs VRTS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLVRTSLAGGINGSAMG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

VRTS leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

VRTS is the larger business by revenue, generating $831M annually — 6.6x SAMG's $125M. VRTS is the more profitable business, keeping 16.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SAMG's 11.2%.

MetricSAMG logoSAMGSilvercrest Asset…VRTS logoVRTSVirtus Investment…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$125M$831M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$12M$205M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$14M$138M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$17M-$67M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+33.0%+74.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+7.4%+17.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+11.2%+16.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+14.8%-8.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-108.8%+10.9%
VRTS leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

VRTS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 7.1x trailing earnings, VRTS trades at a 71% valuation discount to SAMG's 24.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SAMG's 3.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VRTS's 16.2x.

MetricSAMG logoSAMGSilvercrest Asset…VRTS logoVRTSVirtus Investment…
Market CapShares × price$56M$949M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$36M$3.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS24.46x7.10x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.11.88x5.55x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.48x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple3.09x16.20x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.45x1.14x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.42x0.95x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF3.03x
VRTS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SAMG leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

SAMG delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $14 for VRTS. SAMG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.28x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VRTS's 2.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SAMG scores 6/9 vs VRTS's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricSAMG logoSAMGSilvercrest Asset…VRTS logoVRTSVirtus Investment…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+14.2%+13.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+8.8%+3.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.6%+3.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+5.3%+3.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.28x2.74x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$20M$2.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$44M$477M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$24M$2.8B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense83.82x2.15x
SAMG leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

VRTS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SAMG five years ago would be worth $12,059 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,496 for VRTS. Over the past 12 months, VRTS leads with a -5.5% total return vs SAMG's -8.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VRTS at 0.0% vs SAMG's -2.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSAMG logoSAMGSilvercrest Asset…VRTS logoVRTSVirtus Investment…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-9.7%-9.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-8.2%-5.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-8.4%+0.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+20.6%-35.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+61.1%+142.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-2.9%+0.0%
VRTS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

SAMG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

SAMG is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VRTS's 1.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SAMG currently trades 80.6% from its 52-week high vs VRTS's 65.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSAMG logoSAMGSilvercrest Asset…VRTS logoVRTSVirtus Investment…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.83x1.14x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$16.99$215.06
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$12.79$121.61
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+80.6%+65.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10043.755.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded31K101K
SAMG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — SAMG and VRTS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates SAMG as "Buy" and VRTS as "Hold". For income investors, VRTS offers the higher dividend yield at 6.58% vs SAMG's 5.87%.

MetricSAMG logoSAMGSilvercrest Asset…VRTS logoVRTSVirtus Investment…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$163.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts311
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+5.9%+6.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises87
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.80$9.32
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+54.0%+6.3%
Evenly matched — SAMG and VRTS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

VRTS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SAMG leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.

Best OverallVirtus Investment Partners,… (VRTS)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SAMG vs VRTS: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SAMG or VRTS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.

(SAMG) is the stronger pick with 1. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 0% for Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS). Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS) offers the better valuation at 7. 1x trailing P/E (5. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. (SAMG) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SAMG or VRTS?

On trailing P/E, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.

(VRTS) is the cheapest at 7. 1x versus Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. at 24. 5x. On forward P/E, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 5x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SAMG or VRTS?

Over the past 5 years, Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.

(SAMG) delivered a total return of +20. 6%, compared to -35. 0% for Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VRTS returned +142. 6% versus SAMG's +61. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SAMG or VRTS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.

(SAMG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. 's 1. 14β — meaning VRTS is approximately 37% more volatile than SAMG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. (SAMG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 3% for Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SAMG or VRTS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.

(SAMG) is pulling ahead at 1. 3% versus -8. 0% for Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. grew EPS 18. 2% year-over-year, compared to -44. 0% for Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SAMG or VRTS?

Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.

(VRTS) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 7% net margin versus 11. 2% for Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VRTS leads at 17. 4% versus 7. 4% for SAMG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VRTS leads at 74. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SAMG or VRTS more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.

(VRTS) trades at 5. 5x forward P/E versus 11. 9x for Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. — 6. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SAMG or VRTS?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS) offers the highest yield at 6. 6%, versus 5. 9% for Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. (SAMG).

09

Is SAMG or VRTS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.

(SAMG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 83), 5. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SAMG: +61. 1%, VRTS: +142. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SAMG and VRTS?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SAMG is a small-cap income-oriented stock; VRTS is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

SAMG

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.3%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

VRTS

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 9%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SAMG and VRTS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SAMG: 1.3% · VRTS: -8.0%)
Net Margin>
%
(SAMG: 11.2% · VRTS: 16.7%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(SAMG: 24.5x · VRTS: 7.1x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.