Asset Management
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SAMG vs VRTS vs GROW vs CNNE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management - Global
Restaurants
SAMG vs VRTS vs GROW vs CNNE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management - Global | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $56M | $949M | $35M | $1.33B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $125M | $831M | $8M | $424M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14M | $138M | $98K | $-513M |
| Gross Margin | 33.0% | 74.9% | 41.7% | 0.0% |
| Operating Margin | 7.4% | 17.4% | -35.3% | -28.2% |
| Forward P/E | 11.9x | 5.5x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $24M | $2.84B | $83K | $332M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $44M | $477M | $25M | $182M |
SAMG vs VRTS vs GROW vs CNNE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Silvercrest Asset M… (SAMG) | 100 | 121.6 | +21.6% |
| Virtus Investment P… (VRTS) | 100 | 152.5 | +52.5% |
| U.S. Global Investo… (GROW) | 100 | 125.4 | +25.4% |
| Cannae Holdings, In… (CNNE) | 100 | 38.0 | -62.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SAMG vs VRTS vs GROW vs CNNE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SAMG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 5.9%
- Rev growth 1.3%, EPS growth -44.0%
- 1.3% NII/revenue growth vs GROW's -23.1%
- 8.8% ROA vs CNNE's -38.9%, ROIC 5.6% vs -5.7%
VRTS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and bank quality.
- 142.6% 10Y total return vs SAMG's 61.1%
- NIM 0.9% vs SAMG's 0.4%
- Better valuation composite
- 16.7% margin vs CNNE's -121.2%
GROW is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 20.87x
- Beta 0.71, yield 3.5%, current ratio 20.87x
- Beta 0.71 vs VRTS's 1.14, lower leverage
- +27.8% vs CNNE's -18.8%
CNNE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.3% NII/revenue growth vs GROW's -23.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.7% margin vs CNNE's -121.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs VRTS's 1.14, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.6% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs SAMG's 5.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +27.8% vs CNNE's -18.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.8% ROA vs CNNE's -38.9%, ROIC 5.6% vs -5.7% |
SAMG vs VRTS vs GROW vs CNNE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SAMG vs VRTS vs GROW vs CNNE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VRTS leads in 1 of 6 categories
SAMG leads 1 • GROW leads 1 • CNNE leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VRTS leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VRTS is the larger business by revenue, generating $831M annually — 98.3x GROW's $8M. VRTS is the more profitable business, keeping 16.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNNE's -121.2%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $125M | $831M | $8M | $424M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $12M | $205M | -$2M | $3M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14M | $138M | $98,000 | -$513M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $17M | -$67M | -$235,000 | -$35M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.0% | +74.9% | +41.7% | +0.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | +17.4% | -35.3% | -28.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.2% | +16.7% | -4.0% | -121.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.8% | -8.9% | -9.8% | -8.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | -6.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -108.8% | +10.9% | — | -160.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SAMG and GROW each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.1x trailing earnings, VRTS trades at a 71% valuation discount to SAMG's 24.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SAMG's 3.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VRTS's 16.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $56M | $949M | $35M | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $36M | $3.3B | $10M | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.46x | 7.10x | -104.80x | -1.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.88x | 5.55x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.48x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.09x | 16.20x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.45x | 1.14x | 4.14x | 3.13x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.42x | 0.95x | 0.77x | 0.80x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.03x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SAMG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SAMG delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-52 for CNNE. GROW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VRTS's 2.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SAMG scores 6/9 vs GROW's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.2% | +13.5% | +0.2% | -51.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.8% | +3.6% | +0.2% | -38.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.6% | +3.0% | -4.7% | -5.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.3% | +3.7% | -6.2% | -7.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.28x | 2.74x | 0.00x | 0.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$20M | $2.4B | -$24M | $150M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $44M | $477M | $25M | $182M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $24M | $2.8B | $83,000 | $332M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 83.82x | 2.15x | 600.00x | -25.50x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GROW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SAMG five years ago would be worth $12,059 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,950 for CNNE. Over the past 12 months, GROW leads with a +27.8% total return vs CNNE's -18.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GROW at 1.1% vs CNNE's -6.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.7% | -9.8% | +7.7% | -10.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -8.2% | -5.5% | +27.8% | -18.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.4% | +0.1% | +3.3% | -17.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.6% | -35.0% | -58.6% | -60.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.1% | +142.6% | +67.4% | -18.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.9% | +0.0% | +1.1% | -6.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SAMG and GROW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GROW is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VRTS's 1.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SAMG currently trades 80.6% from its 52-week high vs CNNE's 63.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.83x | 1.14x | 0.71x | 0.98x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.99 | $215.06 | $3.65 | $21.96 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.79 | $121.61 | $2.10 | $10.46 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.6% | +65.9% | +71.8% | +63.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.7 | 55.4 | 46.5 | 65.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 31K | 101K | 25K | 641K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SAMG and VRTS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SAMG as "Buy", VRTS as "Hold", CNNE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 21.5% upside for CNNE (target: $17) vs 15.0% for VRTS (target: $163). For income investors, VRTS offers the higher dividend yield at 6.58% vs GROW's 3.46%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $163.00 | — | $17.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 11 | — | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.9% | +6.6% | +3.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 8 | 7 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.80 | $9.32 | $0.09 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +54.0% | +6.3% | +5.6% | 0.0% |
VRTS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). SAMG leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
SAMG vs VRTS vs GROW vs CNNE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SAMG or VRTS or GROW or CNNE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.
(SAMG) is the stronger pick with 1. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 1% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW). Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS) offers the better valuation at 7. 1x trailing P/E (5. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. (SAMG) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SAMG or VRTS or GROW or CNNE?
On trailing P/E, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.
(VRTS) is the cheapest at 7. 1x versus Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. at 24. 5x. On forward P/E, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SAMG or VRTS or GROW or CNNE?
Over the past 5 years, Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.
(SAMG) delivered a total return of +20. 6%, compared to -60. 5% for Cannae Holdings, Inc. (CNNE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VRTS returned +142. 6% versus CNNE's -18. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SAMG or VRTS or GROW or CNNE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), U.
S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 71β versus Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. 's 1. 14β — meaning VRTS is approximately 61% more volatile than GROW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SAMG or VRTS or GROW or CNNE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.
(SAMG) is pulling ahead at 1. 3% versus -23. 1% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. grew EPS 18. 2% year-over-year, compared to -126. 6% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SAMG or VRTS or GROW or CNNE?
Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.
(VRTS) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 7% net margin versus -99. 2% for Cannae Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VRTS leads at 17. 4% versus -35. 3% for GROW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VRTS leads at 74. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SAMG or VRTS or GROW or CNNE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.
(VRTS) trades at 5. 5x forward P/E versus 11. 9x for Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. — 6. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CNNE: 21. 5% to $17. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SAMG or VRTS or GROW or CNNE?
In this comparison, VRTS (6.
6% yield), SAMG (5. 9% yield), GROW (3. 5% yield) pay a dividend. CNNE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SAMG or VRTS or GROW or CNNE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, U.
S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 71), 3. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GROW: +67. 4%, CNNE: -18. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SAMG and VRTS and GROW and CNNE?
These companies operate in different sectors (SAMG (Financial Services) and VRTS (Financial Services) and GROW (Financial Services) and CNNE (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SAMG is a small-cap income-oriented stock; VRTS is a small-cap deep-value stock; GROW is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CNNE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SAMG, VRTS, GROW pay a dividend while CNNE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.