SANG
Sangoma Technologies Corporation
Software - Infrastructure
Market Cap$139M
5Y Perf.+191.0%
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
SANG vs BAND vs MGIC vs LPSN vs NTCT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
BAND
Bandwidth Inc.
Software - Infrastructure
Market Cap$1.56B
5Y Perf.-56.1%
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
Information Technology Services
Market Cap$853M
5Y Perf.+70.9%
LPSN
LivePerson, Inc.
Software - Application
Market Cap$32M
5Y Perf.-99.5%
NTCT
NetScout Systems, Inc.
Software - Infrastructure
Market Cap$2.77B
5Y Perf.+39.4%
SANG vs BAND vs MGIC vs LPSN vs NTCT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | SANG | BAND | MGIC | LPSN | NTCT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Information Technology Services | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $139M | $1.56B | $853M | $32M | $2.77B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $307M | $209.36B | $603M | $244M | $861M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $4.11B | $40M | $-67M | $96M |
| Gross Margin | 52.8% | 37.3% | 28.0% | 62.2% | 79.2% |
| Operating Margin | -1.3% | -2.2% | 10.8% | -9.6% | 12.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 27.4x | 15.0x | — | 15.9x |
| Total Debt | $56M | $701M | $86M | $392M | $76M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $13M | $103M | $113M | $95M | $457M |
SANG vs BAND vs MGIC vs LPSN vs NTCT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
SANG
BAND
MGIC
LPSN
NTCT
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sangoma Technologie… (SANG) | 100 | 291.0 | +191.0% |
| Bandwidth Inc. (BAND) | 100 | 43.9 | -56.1% |
| Magic Software Ente… (MGIC) | 100 | 170.9 | +70.9% |
| LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN) | 100 | 0.5 | -99.5% |
| NetScout Systems, I… (NTCT) | 100 | 139.4 | +39.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SANG vs BAND vs MGIC vs LPSN vs NTCT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: MGIC leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Sangoma Technologies Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. BAND and NTCT also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SANG
Sangoma Technologies Corporation
The Income Pick
SANG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.16
- 20.0% 10Y total return vs MGIC's 222.0%
- Beta 0.16 vs LPSN's 2.05
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
BAND
Bandwidth Inc.
The Momentum Pick
BAND ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +253.6% vs LPSN's -77.1%
Best for: momentum
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
The Growth Play
MGIC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 3.3%, EPS growth 0.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.8%
- 3.3% revenue growth vs LPSN's -22.0%
- Lower P/E (15.0x vs 15.9x)
- 1.2% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: growth exposure
LPSN
LivePerson, Inc.
The Technology Pick
Among these 5 stocks, LPSN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
Best for: technology exposure
NTCT
NetScout Systems, Inc.
The Defensive Pick
NTCT is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, Low D/E 4.9%, current ratio 1.75x
- Beta 1.12, current ratio 1.75x
- 11.1% margin vs LPSN's -27.6%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | MGIC | 3.3% revenue growth vs LPSN's -22.0% |
| Value | MGIC | Lower P/E (15.0x vs 15.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | NTCT | 11.1% margin vs LPSN's -27.6% |
| Stability / Safety | SANG | Beta 0.16 vs LPSN's 2.05 |
| Dividends | MGIC | 1.2% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | BAND | +253.6% vs LPSN's -77.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MGIC | 7.4% ROA vs LPSN's -12.4%, ROIC 16.2% vs -6.6% |
SANG vs BAND vs MGIC vs LPSN vs NTCT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2021
FY 2025
FY 2025
SANG vs BAND vs MGIC vs LPSN vs NTCT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLSANGLAGGINGLPSN
Who Leads Where
NTCT leads in 1 of 6 categories
BAND leads 1 • SANG leads 1 • MGIC leads 0 • LPSN leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓LPSNLivePerson, Inc.
0leads
MGICMagic Software Enterp…
0leads
NTCTNetScout Systems, Inc.
1leads
BANDBandwidth Inc.
1leads
SANGSangoma Technologies …
1leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs BANDvs NTCTMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
NTCT4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
BAND4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
SANG1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTCT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BAND is the larger business by revenue, generating $209.4B annually — 859.0x LPSN's $244M. NTCT is the more profitable business, keeping 11.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LPSN's -27.6%. On growth, BAND holds the edge at +1197.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | SANGSangoma Technolog… | BANDBandwidth Inc. | MGICMagic Software En… | LPSNLivePerson, Inc. | NTCTNetScout Systems,… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $307M | $209.4B | $603M | $244M | $861M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $57M | -$4.6B | $87M | -$562,000 | $171M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | $4.1B | $40M | -$67M | $96M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $43M | $1.8B | $64M | -$43M | $275M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.8% | +37.3% | +28.0% | +62.2% | +79.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.3% | -2.2% | +10.8% | -9.6% | +12.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | +2.0% | +6.6% | -27.6% | +11.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.0% | +0.8% | +10.7% | -17.4% | +32.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.2% | +1197.2% | +13.1% | -19.0% | -0.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.7% | +39.8% | +17.6% | +79.4% | +11.9% |
NTCT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SANG and BAND each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, SANG's 3.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BAND's 50.4x.
| Metric | SANGSangoma Technolog… | BANDBandwidth Inc. | MGICMagic Software En… | LPSNLivePerson, Inc. | NTCTNetScout Systems,… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $139M | $1.6B | $853M | $32M | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $182M | $2.2B | $827M | $329M | $2.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -19.99x | -113.15x | 23.17x | -0.22x | -7.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 27.36x | 14.98x | — | 15.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.98x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.96x | 50.39x | 10.07x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.42x | 2.07x | 1.54x | 0.13x | 3.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.55x | 3.65x | 2.83x | — | 1.78x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.22x | 0.02x | 11.64x | — | 13.11x |
Evenly matched — SANG and BAND each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — MGIC and NTCT each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MGIC delivers a 13.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-3 for SANG. NTCT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BAND's 1.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTCT scores 6/9 vs BAND's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | SANGSangoma Technolog… | BANDBandwidth Inc. | MGICMagic Software En… | LPSNLivePerson, Inc. | NTCTNetScout Systems,… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.0% | +4.0% | +13.4% | — | +6.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.2% | +1.7% | +7.4% | -12.4% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.4% | -1.2% | +16.2% | -6.6% | -19.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.6% | -1.6% | +16.3% | -5.8% | -18.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 1.75x | 0.29x | — | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $43M | $598M | -$27M | $297M | -$381M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $13M | $103M | $113M | $95M | $457M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $56M | $701M | $86M | $392M | $76M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.29x | -10.30x | 11.90x | 0.20x | 55.89x |
Evenly matched — MGIC and NTCT each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BAND leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NTCT five years ago would be worth $14,293 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $35 for LPSN. Over the past 12 months, BAND leads with a +253.6% total return vs LPSN's -77.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BAND at 62.7% vs LPSN's -65.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SANGSangoma Technolog… | BANDBandwidth Inc. | MGICMagic Software En… | LPSNLivePerson, Inc. | NTCTNetScout Systems,… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.9% | +242.2% | -33.3% | -31.1% | +42.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -27.5% | +253.6% | +28.3% | -77.1% | +80.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.0% | +330.6% | +36.5% | -95.8% | +30.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.1% | -61.3% | +24.4% | -99.7% | +42.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1995.0% | +143.3% | +222.0% | -97.0% | +66.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.4% | +62.7% | +10.9% | -65.4% | +9.2% |
BAND leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SANG and BAND each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SANG is the less volatile stock with a 0.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LPSN's 2.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BAND currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs LPSN's 12.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SANGSangoma Technolog… | BANDBandwidth Inc. | MGICMagic Software En… | LPSNLivePerson, Inc. | NTCTNetScout Systems,… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.16x | 1.86x | 1.46x | 2.05x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.49 | $49.25 | $28.00 | $21.60 | $39.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.63 | $12.57 | $13.85 | $2.37 | $19.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.6% | +98.8% | +62.1% | +12.4% | +97.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.2 | 90.4 | 30.7 | 40.3 | 68.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4K | 670K | 34K | 148K | 552K |
Evenly matched — SANG and BAND each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
SANG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SANG as "Buy", BAND as "Buy", MGIC as "Buy", NTCT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 6.4% upside for MGIC (target: $19) vs -24.3% for NTCT (target: $29). MGIC is the only dividend payer here at 1.17% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | SANGSangoma Technolog… | BANDBandwidth Inc. | MGICMagic Software En… | LPSNLivePerson, Inc. | NTCTNetScout Systems,… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.00 | $18.50 | — | $29.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 15 | 6 | — | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.2% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.20 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.9% |
SANG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
NTCT leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). BAND leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
Best OverallSangoma Technologies Corpor… (SANG)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
SANG vs BAND vs MGIC vs LPSN vs NTCT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SANG or BAND or MGIC or LPSN or NTCT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
(MGIC) is the stronger pick with 3. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 0% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. (MGIC) offers the better valuation at 23. 2x trailing P/E (15. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sangoma Technologies Corporation (SANG) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SANG or BAND or MGIC or LPSN or NTCT?
On forward P/E, Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
is actually cheaper at 15. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SANG or BAND or MGIC or LPSN or NTCT?
Over the past 5 years, NetScout Systems, Inc.
(NTCT) delivered a total return of +42. 9%, compared to -99. 7% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SANG returned +1995% versus LPSN's -97. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SANG or BAND or MGIC or LPSN or NTCT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sangoma Technologies Corporation (SANG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
16β versus LivePerson, Inc. 's 2. 05β — meaning LPSN is approximately 1211% more volatile than SANG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NetScout Systems, Inc. (NTCT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 175% for Bandwidth Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SANG or BAND or MGIC or LPSN or NTCT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
(MGIC) is pulling ahead at 3. 3% versus -22. 0% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LivePerson, Inc. grew EPS 45. 4% year-over-year, compared to -144. 4% for NetScout Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BAND leads at 9. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SANG or BAND or MGIC or LPSN or NTCT?
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
(MGIC) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 7% net margin versus -44. 6% for NetScout Systems, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MGIC leads at 11. 1% versus -44. 7% for NTCT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTCT leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SANG or BAND or MGIC or LPSN or NTCT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
(MGIC) trades at 15. 0x forward P/E versus 27. 4x for Bandwidth Inc. — 12. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MGIC: 6. 4% to $18. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — SANG or BAND or MGIC or LPSN or NTCT?
In this comparison, MGIC (1.
2% yield) pays a dividend. SANG, BAND, LPSN, NTCT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SANG or BAND or MGIC or LPSN or NTCT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sangoma Technologies Corporation (SANG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
16), +1995% 10Y return). LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN) carries a higher beta of 2. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SANG: +1995%, LPSN: -97. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SANG and BAND and MGIC and LPSN and NTCT?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
MGIC pays a dividend while SANG, BAND, LPSN, NTCT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(SANG: -13.2% · BAND: 119724.8%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.