SAR vs ARCC

For growth investors, Saratoga Investment Corp.

(SAR) is the stronger pick with 1334% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 32. 9% for Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). Saratoga Investment Corp. (SAR) offers the better valuation at 9. 7x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Saratoga Investment Corp.

(SAR) is the cheapest at 9. 7x versus Ares Capital Corporation at 10. 3x. On forward P/E, Saratoga Investment Corp. is actually cheaper at 9. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Saratoga Investment Corp. wins at 0. 77x versus Ares Capital Corporation's 0. 97x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) delivered a total return of +49.

5%, compared to +42. 2% for Saratoga Investment Corp. (SAR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SAR returned +188. 0% versus ARCC's +139. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Saratoga Investment Corp.

(SAR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 60β versus Ares Capital Corporation's 0. 77β — meaning ARCC is approximately 29% more volatile than SAR relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Saratoga Investment Corp.

(SAR) is pulling ahead at 1334% versus 32. 9% for Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Saratoga Investment Corp. grew EPS 14. 4% year-over-year, compared to -23. 8% for Ares Capital Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is the more profitable company, earning 41.

3% net margin versus 0. 0% for Saratoga Investment Corp. — meaning it keeps 41. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ARCC leads at 69. 7% versus -0. 1% for SAR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARCC leads at 75. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Saratoga Investment Corp. (SAR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 77x versus Ares Capital Corporation's 0. 97x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Saratoga Investment Corp. (SAR) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 10. 0x for Ares Capital Corporation — 1. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Saratoga Investment Corp. (SAR) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 2. 0% for Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Saratoga Investment Corp.

(SAR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 60), 100. 0% yield, +188. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SAR: +188. 0%, ARCC: +139. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.