Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
SBFG logo
SBFG
ICE logo
ICE
CME logo
CME
CZWI logo
CZWI
FIS logo
FIS
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SBFG vs ICE vs CME vs CZWI vs FIS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SBFG
SB Financial Group, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$147M
5Y Perf.+47.3%
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$79.60B
5Y Perf.+53.4%
CME
CME Group Inc.

Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$97.79B
5Y Perf.+65.8%
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$207M
5Y Perf.+212.8%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$20.26B
5Y Perf.-70.8%

SBFG vs ICE vs CME vs CZWI vs FIS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SBFG logoSBFG
ICE logoICE
CME logoCME
CZWI logoCZWI
FIS logoFIS
IndustryBanks - RegionalFinancial - Data & Stock ExchangesFinancial - Data & Stock ExchangesBanks - RegionalInformation Technology Services
Market Cap$147M$79.60B$97.79B$207M$20.26B
Revenue (TTM)$91M$12.64B$6.76B$90M$11.66B
Net Income (TTM)$14M$3.30B$4.24B$14M$2.67B
Gross Margin70.6%61.9%86.3%54.7%37.6%
Operating Margin19.0%38.7%65.6%7.0%17.9%
Forward P/E9.4x17.3x22.0x11.8x6.2x
Total Debt$74M$20.28B$3.76B$52M$4.01B
Cash & Equiv.$72M$837M$4.42B$119M$599M

SBFG vs ICE vs CME vs CZWI vs FISLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SBFG
ICE
CME
CZWI
FIS
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
SB Financial Group,… (SBFG)100147.3+47.3%
Intercontinental Ex… (ICE)100153.4+53.4%
CME Group Inc. (CME)100165.8+65.8%
Citizens Community … (CZWI)100312.8+212.8%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10029.2-70.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SBFG vs ICE vs CME vs CZWI vs FIS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FIS leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. SB Financial Group, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. ICE, CME, and CZWI also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇FIS emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
SBFG
SB Financial Group, Inc.
The Banking Pick

SBFG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and bank quality is your priority.

  • Rev growth 11.9%, EPS growth 27.3%
  • NIM 3.1% vs CZWI's 2.9%
  • 11.9% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
Best for: growth exposure and bank quality
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
The Banking Pick

ICE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.35, yield 1.4%
  • Beta 0.35 vs SBFG's 0.64
Best for: income & stability
CME
CME Group Inc.
The Banking Pick

CME is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 262.4% 10Y total return vs ICE's 195.3%
  • 62.8% margin vs SBFG's 15.4%
Best for: long-term compounding
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
  • Beta 0.50, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3015.31x
  • +52.1% vs FIS's -49.4%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Value Pick

FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.26 vs SBFG's 2.94
  • Lower P/E (6.2x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.26 vs 2.32
  • 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs CME's 4.1%
  • 7.5% ROA vs CZWI's 0.8%, ROIC 6.0% vs 2.0%
Best for: valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSBFG logoSBFG11.9% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
ValueFIS logoFISLower P/E (6.2x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.26 vs 2.32
Quality / MarginsCME logoCME62.8% margin vs SBFG's 15.4%
Stability / SafetyICE logoICEBeta 0.35 vs SBFG's 0.64
DividendsFIS logoFIS4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs CME's 4.1%
Momentum (1Y)CZWI logoCZWI+52.1% vs FIS's -49.4%
Efficiency (ROA)FIS logoFIS7.5% ROA vs CZWI's 0.8%, ROIC 6.0% vs 2.0%

SBFG vs ICE vs CME vs CZWI vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
SBFGSB Financial Group, Inc.
FY 2013
All Segments
111.3%$1M
Data Processing
80.8%$836,000
Operating Segments
28.5%$295,000
All Other Segments
2.0%$21,000
Intersegment Elimination
-122.6%$-1,269,000
ICEIntercontinental Exchange, Inc.
FY 2025
Fixed Income And Data Services Segment
51.1%$1.4B
Exchanges Segment
38.8%$1.0B
Mortgage Technology Segment
10.1%$269M
CMECME Group Inc.
FY 2025
clearing and transaction fees
81.0%$5.3B
MarketData
12.3%$803M
OtherRevenue
6.7%$436M
CZWICitizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$99M
FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B

SBFG vs ICE vs CME vs CZWI vs FIS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCMELAGGINGFIS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CME leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

ICE is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.6B annually — 140.3x CZWI's $90M. CME is the more profitable business, keeping 62.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SBFG's 15.4%.

MetricSBFG logoSBFGSB Financial Grou…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …CME logoCMECME Group Inc.CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$91M$12.6B$6.8B$90M$11.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$19M$6.5B$4.7B$9M$4.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$14M$3.3B$4.2B$14M$2.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$20M$4.3B$4.4B$11M$2.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+70.6%+61.9%+86.3%+54.7%+37.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+19.0%+38.7%+65.6%+7.0%+17.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+15.4%+26.1%+62.8%+16.0%+22.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+21.7%+33.9%+64.4%+12.4%+23.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+30.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+14.5%+23.1%+21.4%+63.0%+30.6%
CME leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SBFG leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 10.6x trailing earnings, SBFG trades at a 80% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CME offers better value at 1.76x vs SBFG's 3.32x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricSBFG logoSBFGSB Financial Grou…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …CME logoCMECME Group Inc.CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Market CapShares × price$147M$79.6B$97.8B$207M$20.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$150M$99.0B$97.1B$140M$23.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS10.64x24.36x24.15x14.70x52.27x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.9.44x17.34x21.98x11.79x6.24x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate3.32x2.74x1.76x2.90x2.14x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.69x15.34x21.56x15.69x6.50x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.61x6.30x15.00x2.29x1.90x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.05x2.77x3.38x1.11x1.46x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF6.85x18.56x23.32x19.90x7.21x
SBFG leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CME leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

FIS delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZWI. CME carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ICE's 0.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs CME's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSBFG logoSBFGSB Financial Grou…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …CME logoCMECME Group Inc.CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+10.3%+11.6%+15.3%+7.8%+18.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.9%+2.3%+2.2%+0.8%+7.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.3%+7.5%+10.2%+2.0%+6.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.0%+9.5%+3.6%+0.6%+6.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–979566
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.53x0.70x0.13x0.28x0.29x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$3M$19.4B-$666M-$67M$3.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$72M$837M$4.4B$119M$599M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$74M$20.3B$3.8B$52M$4.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.68x6.53x41.55x0.16x21.16x
CME leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CZWI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $16,900 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +52.1% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 36.4% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSBFG logoSBFGSB Financial Grou…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …CME logoCMECME Group Inc.CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+10.6%-11.8%+3.2%+24.3%-38.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+30.3%-20.4%+3.6%+52.1%-49.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+98.0%+34.6%+67.9%+153.7%-18.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+44.8%+30.9%+46.2%+69.0%-67.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+167.5%+195.3%+262.4%+149.0%-25.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+25.6%+10.4%+18.9%+36.4%-6.8%
CZWI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SBFG and CME each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CME is the less volatile stock with a -0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SBFG's 0.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SBFG currently trades 97.4% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSBFG logoSBFGSB Financial Grou…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …CME logoCMECME Group Inc.CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.64x0.35x-0.28x0.50x0.61x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$23.93$189.35$329.16$22.62$82.74
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$17.10$136.67$244.56$12.83$37.91
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+97.4%+74.2%+81.9%+94.9%+47.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10060.231.940.151.230.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded10K3.2M2.6M41K5.6M
Evenly matched — SBFG and CME each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — CME and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: ICE as "Buy", CME as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs 19.0% for CME (target: $321). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs ICE's 1.38%.

MetricSBFG logoSBFGSB Financial Grou…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …CME logoCMECME Group Inc.CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$194.00$320.80$62.88
# AnalystsCovering analysts3636237
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.6%+1.4%+4.1%+1.7%+4.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises12131561
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.60$1.93$10.92$0.37$1.63
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+3.9%+1.7%+0.3%+3.0%+7.0%
Evenly matched — CME and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CME leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SBFG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallCME Group Inc. (CME)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SBFG vs ICE vs CME vs CZWI vs FIS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SBFG or ICE or CME or CZWI or FIS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, SB Financial Group, Inc.

(SBFG) is the stronger pick with 11. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). SB Financial Group, Inc. (SBFG) offers the better valuation at 10. 6x trailing P/E (9. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SBFG or ICE or CME or CZWI or FIS?

On trailing P/E, SB Financial Group, Inc.

(SBFG) is the cheapest at 10. 6x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus SB Financial Group, Inc. 's 2. 94x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SBFG or ICE or CME or CZWI or FIS?

Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

(CZWI) delivered a total return of +69. 0%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CME returned +262. 4% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SBFG or ICE or CME or CZWI or FIS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CME Group Inc.

(CME) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 28β versus SB Financial Group, Inc. 's 0. 64β — meaning SBFG is approximately -329% more volatile than CME relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CME Group Inc. (CME) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 70% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SBFG or ICE or CME or CZWI or FIS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), SB Financial Group, Inc.

(SBFG) is pulling ahead at 11. 9% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SB Financial Group, Inc. grew EPS 27. 3% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SBFG or ICE or CME or CZWI or FIS?

CME Group Inc.

(CME) is the more profitable company, earning 62. 0% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 62. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CME leads at 64. 9% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CME leads at 86. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SBFG or ICE or CME or CZWI or FIS more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus SB Financial Group, Inc. 's 2. 94x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 22. 0x for CME Group Inc. — 15. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SBFG or ICE or CME or CZWI or FIS?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 1. 4% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE).

09

Is SBFG or ICE or CME or CZWI or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, CME Group Inc.

(CME) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 28), 4. 1% yield, +262. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CME: +262. 4%, FIS: -25. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SBFG and ICE and CME and CZWI and FIS?

These companies operate in different sectors (SBFG (Financial Services) and ICE (Financial Services) and CME (Financial Services) and CZWI (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SBFG is a small-cap deep-value stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CME is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.