Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
SBFG logo
SBFG
MVBF logo
MVBF
JPM logo
JPM
ICE logo
ICE
CZWI logo
CZWI
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SBFG vs MVBF vs JPM vs ICE vs CZWI

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SBFG
SB Financial Group, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$147M
5Y Perf.+47.3%
MVBF
MVB Financial Corp.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$365M
5Y Perf.+113.7%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$79.60B
5Y Perf.+53.4%
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$207M
5Y Perf.+212.8%

SBFG vs MVBF vs JPM vs ICE vs CZWI — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SBFG logoSBFG
MVBF logoMVBF
JPM logoJPM
ICE logoICE
CZWI logoCZWI
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - DiversifiedFinancial - Data & Stock ExchangesBanks - Regional
Market Cap$147M$365M$896.00B$79.60B$207M
Revenue (TTM)$91M$196M$280.33B$12.64B$90M
Net Income (TTM)$14M$27M$57.05B$3.30B$14M
Gross Margin70.6%60.9%60.0%61.9%54.7%
Operating Margin19.0%18.8%25.9%38.7%7.0%
Forward P/E9.4x17.1x14.4x17.3x11.8x
Total Debt$74M$77M$942.38B$20.28B$52M
Cash & Equiv.$72M$244M$343.34B$837M$119M

SBFG vs MVBF vs JPM vs ICE vs CZWILong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SBFG
MVBF
JPM
ICE
CZWI
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
SB Financial Group,… (SBFG)100147.3+47.3%
MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF)100213.7+113.7%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%
Intercontinental Ex… (ICE)100153.4+53.4%
Citizens Community … (CZWI)100312.8+212.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SBFG vs MVBF vs JPM vs ICE vs CZWI

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ICE leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. SB Financial Group, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. MVBF and CZWI also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇ICE emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
SBFG
SB Financial Group, Inc.
The Banking Pick

SBFG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.64, yield 2.6%
  • Beta 0.64, yield 2.6%, current ratio 3.66x
  • Lower P/E (9.4x vs 11.8x)
  • 2.6% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%
Best for: income & stability and defensive
MVBF
MVB Financial Corp.
The Banking Pick

MVBF ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and bank quality.

  • Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 34.6%
  • NIM 3.2% vs JPM's 2.2%
  • 19.0% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
Best for: growth exposure and bank quality
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.

  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs ICE's 195.3%
  • PEG 0.81 vs SBFG's 2.94
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
The Banking Pick

ICE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and stability.

  • Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs MVBF's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
  • Beta 0.35 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
  • Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs MVBF's 0.6%
Best for: quality and stability
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
  • +52.1% vs ICE's -20.4%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMVBF logoMVBF19.0% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
ValueSBFG logoSBFGLower P/E (9.4x vs 11.8x)
Quality / MarginsICE logoICEEfficiency ratio 0.2% vs MVBF's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyICE logoICEBeta 0.35 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
DividendsSBFG logoSBFG2.6% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%
Momentum (1Y)CZWI logoCZWI+52.1% vs ICE's -20.4%
Efficiency (ROA)ICE logoICEEfficiency ratio 0.2% vs MVBF's 0.6%

SBFG vs MVBF vs JPM vs ICE vs CZWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
SBFGSB Financial Group, Inc.
FY 2013
All Segments
111.3%$1M
Data Processing
80.8%$836,000
Operating Segments
28.5%$295,000
All Other Segments
2.0%$21,000
Intersegment Elimination
-122.6%$-1,269,000
MVBFMVB Financial Corp.
FY 2019
Product And Services, Service Charges On Deposit Accounts
41.4%$1M
Product And Services, Consulting Income
27.1%$921,000
Product And Services, Debit Card And Interchange Income
16.8%$571,000
Product And Services, Other
14.7%$499,000
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
ICEIntercontinental Exchange, Inc.
FY 2025
Fixed Income And Data Services Segment
51.1%$1.4B
Exchanges Segment
38.8%$1.0B
Mortgage Technology Segment
10.1%$269M
CZWICitizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$99M

SBFG vs MVBF vs JPM vs ICE vs CZWI — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLICELAGGINGJPM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ICE leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 3112.4x CZWI's $90M. ICE is the more profitable business, keeping 26.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MVBF's 13.7%.

MetricSBFG logoSBFGSB Financial Grou…MVBF logoMVBFMVB Financial Cor…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …ICE logoICEIntercontinental …CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$91M$196M$280.3B$12.6B$90M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$19M$39M$81.4B$6.5B$9M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$14M$27M$57.0B$3.3B$14M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$20M$2M$100.9B$4.3B$11M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+70.6%+60.9%+60.0%+61.9%+54.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+19.0%+18.8%+25.9%+38.7%+7.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+15.4%+13.7%+20.4%+26.1%+16.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+21.7%+1.0%+36.0%+33.9%+12.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+14.5%-55.6%+16.0%+23.1%+63.0%
ICE leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SBFG leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 10.6x trailing earnings, SBFG trades at a 56% valuation discount to ICE's 24.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs SBFG's 3.32x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricSBFG logoSBFGSB Financial Grou…MVBF logoMVBFMVB Financial Cor…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …ICE logoICEIntercontinental …CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…
Market CapShares × price$147M$365M$896.0B$79.6B$207M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$150M$198M$1.50T$99.0B$140M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS10.64x13.80x16.00x24.36x14.70x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.9.44x17.12x14.40x17.34x11.79x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate3.32x0.90x2.74x2.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.69x5.38x18.36x15.34x15.69x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.61x1.35x3.20x6.30x2.29x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.05x1.12x2.47x2.77x1.11x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF6.85x172.76x8.88x18.56x19.90x
SBFG leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ICE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZWI. MVBF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSBFG logoSBFGSB Financial Grou…MVBF logoMVBFMVB Financial Cor…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …ICE logoICEIntercontinental …CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+10.3%+8.5%+15.9%+11.6%+7.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.9%+0.8%+1.3%+2.3%+0.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.3%+7.0%+4.5%+7.5%+2.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.0%+8.2%+8.9%+9.5%+0.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–977596
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.53x0.23x2.60x0.70x0.28x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$3M-$167M$599.0B$19.4B-$67M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$72M$244M$343.3B$837M$119M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$74M$77M$942.4B$20.3B$52M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.68x0.54x0.74x6.53x0.16x
ICE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CZWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,505 for MVBF. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +52.1% total return vs ICE's -20.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 36.4% vs ICE's 10.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSBFG logoSBFGSB Financial Grou…MVBF logoMVBFMVB Financial Cor…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …ICE logoICEIntercontinental …CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+10.6%+13.0%-0.5%-11.8%+24.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+30.3%+42.0%+21.8%-20.4%+52.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+98.0%+48.2%+138.2%+34.6%+153.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+44.8%-24.9%+118.2%+30.9%+69.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+167.5%+166.6%+465.8%+195.3%+149.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+25.6%+14.0%+33.6%+10.4%+36.4%
CZWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SBFG and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ICE is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SBFG currently trades 97.4% from its 52-week high vs ICE's 74.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSBFG logoSBFGSB Financial Grou…MVBF logoMVBFMVB Financial Cor…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …ICE logoICEIntercontinental …CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.64x0.65x0.94x0.35x0.50x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$23.93$29.59$337.25$189.35$22.62
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$17.10$20.00$262.71$136.67$12.83
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+97.4%+96.0%+95.1%+74.2%+94.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10060.261.459.131.951.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded10K38K7.0M3.2M41K
Evenly matched — SBFG and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — SBFG and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: MVBF as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", ICE as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.0% upside for ICE (target: $194) vs 5.6% for MVBF (target: $30). For income investors, SBFG offers the higher dividend yield at 2.58% vs ICE's 1.38%.

MetricSBFG logoSBFGSB Financial Grou…MVBF logoMVBFMVB Financial Cor…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …ICE logoICEIntercontinental …CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$30.00$339.75$194.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts861362
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.6%+2.3%+1.9%+1.4%+1.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises12015136
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.60$0.66$5.95$1.93$0.37
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+3.9%+2.8%+3.9%+1.7%+3.0%
Evenly matched — SBFG and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

ICE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SBFG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallIntercontinental Exchange, … (ICE)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SBFG vs MVBF vs JPM vs ICE vs CZWI: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SBFG or MVBF or JPM or ICE or CZWI a better buy right now?

For growth investors, MVB Financial Corp.

(MVBF) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). SB Financial Group, Inc. (SBFG) offers the better valuation at 10. 6x trailing P/E (9. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SBFG or MVBF or JPM or ICE or CZWI?

On trailing P/E, SB Financial Group, Inc.

(SBFG) is the cheapest at 10. 6x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. at 24. 4x. On forward P/E, SB Financial Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus SB Financial Group, Inc. 's 2. 94x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SBFG or MVBF or JPM or ICE or CZWI?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -24. 9% for MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus CZWI's +149. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SBFG or MVBF or JPM or ICE or CZWI?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately 168% more volatile than ICE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SBFG or MVBF or JPM or ICE or CZWI?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), MVB Financial Corp.

(MVBF) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MVB Financial Corp. grew EPS 34. 6% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SBFG or MVBF or JPM or ICE or CZWI?

Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 1% net margin versus 10. 0% for MVB Financial Corp. — meaning it keeps 26. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ICE leads at 38. 7% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MVBF leads at 71. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SBFG or MVBF or JPM or ICE or CZWI more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus SB Financial Group, Inc. 's 2. 94x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, SB Financial Group, Inc. (SBFG) trades at 9. 4x forward P/E versus 17. 3x for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. — 7. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ICE: 38. 0% to $194. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SBFG or MVBF or JPM or ICE or CZWI?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

SB Financial Group, Inc. (SBFG) offers the highest yield at 2. 6%, versus 1. 4% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE).

09

Is SBFG or MVBF or JPM or ICE or CZWI better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35), 1. 4% yield, +195. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ICE: +195. 3%, JPM: +465. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SBFG and MVBF and JPM and ICE and CZWI?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SBFG is a small-cap deep-value stock; MVBF is a small-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.