Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
SBFG logo
SBFG
MVBF logo
MVBF
JPM logo
JPM
KO logo
KO
ICE logo
ICE
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SBFG vs MVBF vs JPM vs KO vs ICE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SBFG
SB Financial Group, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$147M
5Y Perf.+47.3%
MVBF
MVB Financial Corp.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$365M
5Y Perf.+113.7%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+84.9%
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$79.60B
5Y Perf.+53.4%

SBFG vs MVBF vs JPM vs KO vs ICE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SBFG logoSBFG
MVBF logoMVBF
JPM logoJPM
KO logoKO
ICE logoICE
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - DiversifiedBeverages - Non-AlcoholicFinancial - Data & Stock Exchanges
Market Cap$147M$365M$896.00B$355.61B$79.60B
Revenue (TTM)$91M$196M$280.33B$49.28B$12.64B
Net Income (TTM)$14M$27M$57.05B$13.70B$3.30B
Gross Margin70.6%60.9%60.0%61.7%61.9%
Operating Margin19.0%18.8%25.9%29.3%38.7%
Forward P/E9.4x17.1x14.4x25.3x17.3x
Total Debt$74M$77M$942.38B$45.49B$20.28B
Cash & Equiv.$72M$244M$343.34B$10.27B$837M

SBFG vs MVBF vs JPM vs KO vs ICELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SBFG
MVBF
JPM
KO
ICE
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
SB Financial Group,… (SBFG)100147.3+47.3%
MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF)100213.7+113.7%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100184.9+84.9%
Intercontinental Ex… (ICE)100153.4+53.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SBFG vs MVBF vs JPM vs KO vs ICE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SBFG and MVBF are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. MVB Financial Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. KO and ICE also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SBFG
SB Financial Group, Inc.
The Banking Pick

SBFG has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.64, yield 2.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.64, Low D/E 52.6%, current ratio 3.66x
  • Beta 0.64, yield 2.6%, current ratio 3.66x
  • Lower P/E (9.4x vs 17.3x)
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
MVBF
MVB Financial Corp.
The Banking Pick

MVBF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and bank quality is your priority.

  • Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 34.6%
  • NIM 3.2% vs JPM's 2.2%
  • 19.0% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
  • +42.0% vs ICE's -20.4%
Best for: growth exposure and bank quality
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.

  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs ICE's 195.3%
  • PEG 0.81 vs SBFG's 2.94
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Quality Compounder

KO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and efficiency.

  • 27.8% margin vs MVBF's 13.7%
  • 13.1% ROA vs MVBF's 0.8%, ROIC 15.8% vs 7.0%
Best for: quality and efficiency
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
The Banking Pick

ICE is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.

  • Beta 0.35 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
Best for: stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMVBF logoMVBF19.0% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
ValueSBFG logoSBFGLower P/E (9.4x vs 17.3x)
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs MVBF's 13.7%
Stability / SafetyICE logoICEBeta 0.35 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
DividendsSBFG logoSBFG2.6% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%
Momentum (1Y)MVBF logoMVBF+42.0% vs ICE's -20.4%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs MVBF's 0.8%, ROIC 15.8% vs 7.0%

SBFG vs MVBF vs JPM vs KO vs ICE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
SBFGSB Financial Group, Inc.
FY 2013
All Segments
111.3%$1M
Data Processing
80.8%$836,000
Operating Segments
28.5%$295,000
All Other Segments
2.0%$21,000
Intersegment Elimination
-122.6%$-1,269,000
MVBFMVB Financial Corp.
FY 2019
Product And Services, Service Charges On Deposit Accounts
41.4%$1M
Product And Services, Consulting Income
27.1%$921,000
Product And Services, Debit Card And Interchange Income
16.8%$571,000
Product And Services, Other
14.7%$499,000
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
ICEIntercontinental Exchange, Inc.
FY 2025
Fixed Income And Data Services Segment
51.1%$1.4B
Exchanges Segment
38.8%$1.0B
Mortgage Technology Segment
10.1%$269M

SBFG vs MVBF vs JPM vs KO vs ICE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGMVBF

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ICE leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 3079.7x SBFG's $91M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MVBF's 13.7%.

MetricSBFG logoSBFGSB Financial Grou…MVBF logoMVBFMVB Financial Cor…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$91M$196M$280.3B$49.3B$12.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$19M$39M$81.4B$15.5B$6.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$14M$27M$57.0B$13.7B$3.3B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$20M$2M$100.9B$12.6B$4.3B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+70.6%+60.9%+60.0%+61.7%+61.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+19.0%+18.8%+25.9%+29.3%+38.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+15.4%+13.7%+20.4%+27.8%+26.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+21.7%+1.0%+36.0%+25.5%+33.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+14.5%-55.6%+16.0%+18.2%+23.1%
ICE leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SBFG leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 10.6x trailing earnings, SBFG trades at a 61% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs SBFG's 3.32x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricSBFG logoSBFGSB Financial Grou…MVBF logoMVBFMVB Financial Cor…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
Market CapShares × price$147M$365M$896.0B$355.6B$79.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$150M$198M$1.50T$390.8B$99.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS10.64x13.80x16.00x27.18x24.36x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.9.44x17.12x14.40x25.27x17.34x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate3.32x0.90x2.43x2.74x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.69x5.38x18.36x26.39x15.34x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.61x1.35x3.20x7.42x6.30x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.05x1.12x2.47x10.40x2.77x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF6.85x172.76x8.88x67.15x18.56x
SBFG leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $8 for MVBF. MVBF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSBFG logoSBFGSB Financial Grou…MVBF logoMVBFMVB Financial Cor…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+10.3%+8.5%+15.9%+41.1%+11.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.9%+0.8%+1.3%+13.1%+2.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.3%+7.0%+4.5%+15.8%+7.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.0%+8.2%+8.9%+17.3%+9.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–977579
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.53x0.23x2.60x1.33x0.70x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$3M-$167M$599.0B$35.2B$19.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$72M$244M$343.3B$10.3B$837M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$74M$77M$942.4B$45.5B$20.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.68x0.54x0.74x10.70x6.53x
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,505 for MVBF. Over the past 12 months, MVBF leads with a +42.0% total return vs ICE's -20.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs ICE's 10.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSBFG logoSBFGSB Financial Grou…MVBF logoMVBFMVB Financial Cor…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+10.6%+13.0%-0.5%+20.3%-11.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+30.3%+42.0%+21.8%+17.2%-20.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+98.0%+48.2%+138.2%+47.0%+34.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+44.8%-24.9%+118.2%+65.6%+30.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+167.5%+166.6%+465.8%+121.1%+195.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+25.6%+14.0%+33.6%+13.7%+10.4%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs ICE's 74.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSBFG logoSBFGSB Financial Grou…MVBF logoMVBFMVB Financial Cor…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.64x0.65x0.94x-0.20x0.35x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$23.93$29.59$337.25$84.04$189.35
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$17.10$20.00$262.71$65.35$136.67
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+97.4%+96.0%+95.1%+98.3%+74.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10060.261.459.160.631.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded10K38K7.0M12.7M3.2M
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — SBFG and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: MVBF as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", KO as "Buy", ICE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.0% upside for ICE (target: $194) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, SBFG offers the higher dividend yield at 2.58% vs ICE's 1.38%.

MetricSBFG logoSBFGSB Financial Grou…MVBF logoMVBFMVB Financial Cor…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$30.00$339.75$86.13$194.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts8614836
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.6%+2.3%+1.9%+2.5%+1.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises120155613
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.60$0.66$5.95$2.04$1.93
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+3.9%+2.8%+3.9%+0.2%+1.7%
Evenly matched — SBFG and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). ICE leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SBFG vs MVBF vs JPM vs KO vs ICE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SBFG or MVBF or JPM or KO or ICE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, MVB Financial Corp.

(MVBF) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). SB Financial Group, Inc. (SBFG) offers the better valuation at 10. 6x trailing P/E (9. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SBFG or MVBF or JPM or KO or ICE?

On trailing P/E, SB Financial Group, Inc.

(SBFG) is the cheapest at 10. 6x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, SB Financial Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus SB Financial Group, Inc. 's 2. 94x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SBFG or MVBF or JPM or KO or ICE?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -24. 9% for MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus KO's +121. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SBFG or MVBF or JPM or KO or ICE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately -571% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SBFG or MVBF or JPM or KO or ICE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), MVB Financial Corp.

(MVBF) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MVB Financial Corp. grew EPS 34. 6% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SBFG or MVBF or JPM or KO or ICE?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus 10. 0% for MVB Financial Corp. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ICE leads at 38. 7% versus 13. 6% for MVBF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MVBF leads at 71. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SBFG or MVBF or JPM or KO or ICE more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus SB Financial Group, Inc. 's 2. 94x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, SB Financial Group, Inc. (SBFG) trades at 9. 4x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 15. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ICE: 38. 0% to $194. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SBFG or MVBF or JPM or KO or ICE?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

SB Financial Group, Inc. (SBFG) offers the highest yield at 2. 6%, versus 1. 4% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE).

09

Is SBFG or MVBF or JPM or KO or ICE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, JPM: +465. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SBFG and MVBF and JPM and KO and ICE?

These companies operate in different sectors (SBFG (Financial Services) and MVBF (Financial Services) and JPM (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and ICE (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SBFG is a small-cap deep-value stock; MVBF is a small-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.