Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SBFM vs SNDX vs IMVT vs CRL vs MEDP

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SBFM
Sunshine Biopharma, Inc.

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic

HealthcareNASDAQ • CA
Market Cap$737K
5Y Perf.-99.4%
SNDX
Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.90B
5Y Perf.+32.7%
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.88B
5Y Perf.+12.8%
CRL
Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$8.76B
5Y Perf.-1.1%
MEDP
Medpace Holdings, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$12.11B
5Y Perf.+356.8%

SBFM vs SNDX vs IMVT vs CRL vs MEDP — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SBFM logoSBFM
SNDX logoSNDX
IMVT logoIMVT
CRL logoCRL
MEDP logoMEDP
IndustryDrug Manufacturers - Specialty & GenericBiotechnologyBiotechnologyMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchMedical - Diagnostics & Research
Market Cap$737K$1.90B$5.88B$8.76B$12.11B
Revenue (TTM)$36M$217M$0.00$4.03B$2.68B
Net Income (TTM)$-6M$-243M$-464M$-185M$460M
Gross Margin33.3%98.0%31.9%29.1%
Operating Margin-17.9%-102.9%11.8%21.0%
Forward P/E16.0x25.0x
Total Debt$952K$346M$98K$3.07B$250M
Cash & Equiv.$10M$135M$714M$214M$497M

SBFM vs SNDX vs IMVT vs CRL vs MEDPLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SBFM
SNDX
IMVT
CRL
MEDP
StockMay 20May 26Return
Sunshine Biopharma,… (SBFM)1000.6-99.4%
Syndax Pharmaceutic… (SNDX)100132.7+32.7%
Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT)100112.8+12.8%
Charles River Labor… (CRL)10098.9-1.1%
Medpace Holdings, I… (MEDP)100456.8+356.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SBFM vs SNDX vs IMVT vs CRL vs MEDP

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SNDX and MEDP are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Medpace Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. IMVT and CRL also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SBFM
Sunshine Biopharma, Inc.
The Growth Play

SBFM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 44.7%, EPS growth 97.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 434.5%
Best for: growth exposure
SNDX
Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Income Pick

SNDX has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.69
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.69, current ratio 4.40x
  • Beta 0.69, current ratio 4.40x
  • 6.3% revenue growth vs IMVT's -21.3%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

IMVT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +102.4% vs SBFM's -14.6%
Best for: momentum
CRL
Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
The Value Play

CRL is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Lower P/E (16.0x vs 25.0x)
Best for: value
MEDP
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

MEDP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 14.3% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 190.9%
  • 17.2% margin vs SNDX's -112.0%
  • 24.8% ROA vs SNDX's -45.2%, ROIC 154.9% vs -54.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSNDX logoSNDX6.3% revenue growth vs IMVT's -21.3%
ValueCRL logoCRLLower P/E (16.0x vs 25.0x)
Quality / MarginsMEDP logoMEDP17.2% margin vs SNDX's -112.0%
Stability / SafetySNDX logoSNDXBeta 0.69 vs CRL's 1.44
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)IMVT logoIMVT+102.4% vs SBFM's -14.6%
Efficiency (ROA)MEDP logoMEDP24.8% ROA vs SNDX's -45.2%, ROIC 154.9% vs -54.2%

SBFM vs SNDX vs IMVT vs CRL vs MEDP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SBFMSunshine Biopharma, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

SNDXSyndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
FY 2025
Net Product Revenues
72.4%$125M
Collaboration revenue
24.6%$42M
Milestone Revenue
3.0%$5M
IMVTImmunovant, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CRLCharles River Laboratories International, Inc.
FY 2025
Discovery and Safety Assessment
59.8%$2.4B
Research Models and Services
21.1%$846M
Manufacturing Support
19.1%$766M
MEDPMedpace Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Oncology
29.5%$748M
Metabolic
29.4%$745M
Other
16.1%$409M
Central Nervous System
10.1%$255M
Cardiology
9.5%$239M
Antiviral And Anti Infective
5.3%$135M

SBFM vs SNDX vs IMVT vs CRL vs MEDP — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMEDPLAGGINGIMVT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — SNDX and MEDP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

CRL and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $4.0B and $0 in trailing revenue. MEDP is the more profitable business, keeping 17.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SNDX's -112.0%.

MetricSBFM logoSBFMSunshine Biopharm…SNDX logoSNDXSyndax Pharmaceut…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…MEDP logoMEDPMedpace Holdings,…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$36M$217M$0$4.0B$2.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$6M-$218M-$487M$824M$577M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$6M-$243M-$464M-$185M$460M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$9M-$278M-$423M$391M$745M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+33.3%+98.0%+31.9%+29.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-17.9%-102.9%+11.8%+21.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-17.4%-112.0%-4.6%+17.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-26.1%-128.2%+9.7%+27.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+1.2%+2.2%+1.2%+26.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+21.5%+100.0%+19.7%-160.0%+16.6%
Evenly matched — SNDX and MEDP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CRL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, CRL's 12.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MEDP's 21.1x.

MetricSBFM logoSBFMSunshine Biopharm…SNDX logoSNDXSyndax Pharmaceut…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…MEDP logoMEDPMedpace Holdings,…
Market CapShares × price$736,836$1.9B$5.9B$8.8B$12.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$8M$2.1B$5.2B$11.6B$11.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.14x-6.53x-10.60x-61.04x27.75x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.16.00x24.96x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.87x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple12.75x21.07x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.02x11.00x2.18x4.79x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.03x28.80x6.20x2.74x27.27x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF16.90x17.76x
CRL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MEDP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

MEDP delivers a 120.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $121 in annual profit, vs $-3 for SNDX. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SNDX's 5.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MEDP scores 6/9 vs SBFM's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricSBFM logoSBFMSunshine Biopharm…SNDX logoSNDXSyndax Pharmaceut…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…MEDP logoMEDPMedpace Holdings,…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-24.6%-2.6%-47.1%-5.7%+120.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-19.7%-45.2%-44.1%-2.5%+24.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital-42.9%-54.2%+6.3%+154.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-25.2%-53.0%-66.1%+8.1%+65.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–912246
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.04x5.36x0.00x0.95x0.55x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$9M$212M-$714M$2.9B-$247M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$10M$135M$714M$214M$497M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$952,480$346M$98,000$3.1B$250M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-757.53x-2.31x4.29x
MEDP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MEDP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MEDP five years ago would be worth $26,697 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1 for SBFM. Over the past 12 months, IMVT leads with a +102.4% total return vs SBFM's -14.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MEDP at 26.5% vs SBFM's -89.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSBFM logoSBFMSunshine Biopharm…SNDX logoSNDXSyndax Pharmaceut…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…MEDP logoMEDPMedpace Holdings,…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-18.0%+0.9%+11.7%-12.3%-25.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-14.6%+95.2%+102.4%+25.7%+41.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%+5.9%+49.8%-6.5%+102.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%+37.4%+84.4%-46.6%+167.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%+50.1%+190.9%+114.0%+1425.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-89.9%+1.9%+14.4%-2.2%+26.5%
MEDP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SNDX and IMVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

SNDX is the less volatile stock with a 0.69 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CRL's 1.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs SBFM's 43.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSBFM logoSBFMSunshine Biopharm…SNDX logoSNDXSyndax Pharmaceut…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…MEDP logoMEDPMedpace Holdings,…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.33x0.69x1.36x1.44x1.21x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.43$25.58$30.09$228.88$628.92
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.95$8.58$13.36$132.58$284.48
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+43.2%+84.0%+96.2%+77.6%+67.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10056.240.750.657.441.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded37K1.6M1.4M792K371K
Evenly matched — SNDX and IMVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: SNDX as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", CRL as "Buy", MEDP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 93.1% upside for SNDX (target: $42) vs 16.2% for CRL (target: $206).

MetricSBFM logoSBFMSunshine Biopharm…SNDX logoSNDXSyndax Pharmaceut…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…MEDP logoMEDPMedpace Holdings,…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$41.50$45.50$206.43$498.86
# AnalystsCovering analysts22233619
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises11
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+100.0%0.0%0.0%+4.1%+7.6%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

MEDP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). CRL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallMedpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SBFM vs SNDX vs IMVT vs CRL vs MEDP: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SBFM or SNDX or IMVT or CRL or MEDP a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(SNDX) is the stronger pick with 627. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP) offers the better valuation at 27. 7x trailing P/E (25. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (SNDX) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SBFM or SNDX or IMVT or CRL or MEDP?

On forward P/E, Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 16. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SBFM or SNDX or IMVT or CRL or MEDP?

Over the past 5 years, Medpace Holdings, Inc.

(MEDP) delivered a total return of +167. 0%, compared to -100. 0% for Sunshine Biopharma, Inc. (SBFM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MEDP returned +1426% versus SBFM's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SBFM or SNDX or IMVT or CRL or MEDP?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(SNDX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 69β versus Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. 's 1. 44β — meaning CRL is approximately 109% more volatile than SNDX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 5% for Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SBFM or SNDX or IMVT or CRL or MEDP?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(SNDX) is pulling ahead at 627. 8% versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sunshine Biopharma, Inc. grew EPS 97. 9% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SBFM leads at 434. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SBFM or SNDX or IMVT or CRL or MEDP?

Medpace Holdings, Inc.

(MEDP) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 8% net margin versus -165. 6% for Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MEDP leads at 21. 1% versus -158. 4% for SNDX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SNDX leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SBFM or SNDX or IMVT or CRL or MEDP more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.

(CRL) trades at 16. 0x forward P/E versus 25. 0x for Medpace Holdings, Inc. — 9. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SNDX: 93. 1% to $41. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SBFM or SNDX or IMVT or CRL or MEDP?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is SBFM or SNDX or IMVT or CRL or MEDP better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Medpace Holdings, Inc.

(MEDP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 21), +1426% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MEDP: +1426%, SBFM: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SBFM and SNDX and IMVT and CRL and MEDP?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SBFM is a small-cap high-growth stock; SNDX is a small-cap high-growth stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MEDP is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SBFM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 19%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SNDX

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 111%
  • Gross Margin > 58%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IMVT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CRL

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 19%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MEDP

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SBFM and SNDX and IMVT and CRL and MEDP on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SBFM: 1.2% · SNDX: 223.6%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.