SBSW
Sibanye Stillwater Limited
Gold
Market Cap$9.33B
5Y Perf.+79.7%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
SBSW vs SA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
SA
Seabridge Gold Inc.
Gold
Market Cap$3.16B
5Y Perf.+91.4%
SBSW vs SA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | SBSW | SA |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gold | Gold |
| Market Cap | $9.33B | $3.16B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $238.26B | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12.39B | $-50M |
| Gross Margin | 21.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 18.9% | — |
| Forward P/E | 0.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $44.34B | $564M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $17.16B | $50M |
SBSW vs SA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
SBSW
SA
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sibanye Stillwater … (SBSW) | 100 | 179.7 | +79.7% |
| Seabridge Gold Inc. (SA) | 100 | 191.4 | +91.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SBSW vs SA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: SBSW and SA are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Seabridge Gold Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SBSW
Sibanye Stillwater Limited
The Growth Play
SBSW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 7.1%, EPS growth 34.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -4.6%
- 7.1% revenue growth vs SA's -6.1%
- 0.2% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: growth exposure
SA
Seabridge Gold Inc.
The Income Pick
SA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.21
- 129.8% 10Y total return vs SBSW's 30.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.21, Low D/E 66.9%, current ratio 2.86x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SBSW | 7.1% revenue growth vs SA's -6.1% |
| Quality / Margins | SA | 0.2% margin vs SBSW's -5.2% |
| Stability / Safety | SA | Beta 1.21 vs SBSW's 1.27, lower leverage |
| Dividends | SBSW | 0.2% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | SBSW | +167.2% vs SA's +137.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SA | -2.9% ROA vs SBSW's -8.3%, ROIC -1.3% vs 22.9% |
SBSW vs SA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
Segment breakdown not available.
SBSW vs SA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLSALAGGINGSBSW
SBSWSibanye Stillwater Li…
0leads
SASeabridge Gold Inc.
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs SBSWMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
SA1/1
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
SA5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
SA5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
SA2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SBSW and SA operate at a comparable scale, with $238.3B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | SBSWSibanye Stillwate… | SASeabridge Gold In… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $238.3B | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $63.5B | -$22M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12.4B | -$50M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9.5B | -$126M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.2% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.9% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.2% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.4% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.0% | -3.2% |
SA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SBSW and SA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | SBSWSibanye Stillwate… | SASeabridge Gold In… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.3B | $3.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.0B | $3.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -31.78x | -115.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.25x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.67x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.27x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.47x | 4.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 90.73x | — |
Evenly matched — SBSW and SA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SA delivers a -4.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-5 in annual profit, vs $-28 for SBSW. SA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.67x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SBSW's 1.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SBSW scores 6/9 vs SA's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | SBSWSibanye Stillwate… | SASeabridge Gold In… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -28.1% | -4.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.3% | -2.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +22.9% | -1.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +19.1% | -1.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.00x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $27.2B | $514M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $17.2B | $50M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $44.3B | $564M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.31x | -18.32x |
SA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SA five years ago would be worth $16,358 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,014 for SBSW. Over the past 12 months, SBSW leads with a +167.2% total return vs SA's +137.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SA at 23.2% vs SBSW's 12.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SBSWSibanye Stillwate… | SASeabridge Gold In… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.5% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +167.2% | +137.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.9% | +87.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.9% | +63.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +30.7% | +129.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.1% | +23.2% |
SA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SA is the less volatile stock with a 1.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SBSW's 1.27 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SA currently trades 74.1% from its 52-week high vs SBSW's 62.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SBSWSibanye Stillwate… | SASeabridge Gold In… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.27x | 1.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.29 | $40.06 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.52 | $11.12 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +62.0% | +74.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.0 | 52.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.7M | 969K |
SA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SBSW as "Hold" and SA as "Buy". SBSW is the only dividend payer here at 0.18% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | SBSWSibanye Stillwate… | SASeabridge Gold In… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.27 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.40 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
SA leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
Best OverallSeabridge Gold Inc. (SA)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
SBSW vs SA: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SBSW or SA a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Seabridge Gold Inc.
(SA) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SBSW or SA?
Over the past 5 years, Seabridge Gold Inc.
(SA) delivered a total return of +63. 6%, compared to -19. 9% for Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SA returned +129. 8% versus SBSW's +30. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SBSW or SA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Seabridge Gold Inc.
(SA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 21β versus Sibanye Stillwater Limited's 1. 27β — meaning SBSW is approximately 6% more volatile than SA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Seabridge Gold Inc. (SA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 67% versus 100% for Sibanye Stillwater Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SBSW or SA?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sibanye Stillwater Limited grew EPS 34.
1% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for Seabridge Gold Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SBSW or SA?
Seabridge Gold Inc.
(SA) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -4. 0% for Sibanye Stillwater Limited — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SBSW leads at 18. 5% versus 0. 0% for SA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SBSW leads at 23. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SBSW or SA?
In this comparison, SBSW (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. SA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is SBSW or SA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Seabridge Gold Inc.
(SA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 21), +129. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SA: +129. 8%, SBSW: +30. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SBSW and SA?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.