REIT - Mortgage
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SCCG vs WELL vs VTR vs GPMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Mortgage
SCCG vs WELL vs VTR vs GPMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $1.14B | $149.25B | $41.15B | $74M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $11.63B | $6.13B | $132M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $1.43B | $260M | $-40M |
| Gross Margin | — | 39.1% | -4.3% | 47.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | 4.4% | 13.4% | -4.3% |
| Forward P/E | 397.8x | 78.4x | 118.0x | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $21.38B | $13.22B | $1.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $5.03B | $741M | $66M |
SCCG vs WELL vs VTR vs GPMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sachem Capital Corp… (SCCG) | 100 | 96.1 | -3.9% |
| Welltower Inc. (WELL) | 100 | 277.9 | +177.9% |
| Ventas, Inc. (VTR) | 100 | 180.8 | +80.8% |
| Granite Point Mortg… (GPMT) | 100 | 16.5 | -83.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SCCG vs WELL vs VTR vs GPMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SCCG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
WELL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 223.1% 10Y total return vs VTR's 65.0%
- Lower P/E (78.4x vs 118.0x)
- 12.3% margin vs GPMT's -30.5%
- 1.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs GPMT's 14.0%
VTR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.01, yield 2.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.01, current ratio 0.96x
- Beta 0.01, yield 2.1%, current ratio 0.96x
- Beta 0.01 vs GPMT's 1.44, lower leverage
GPMT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 187.8%, EPS growth 73.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.9%
- 187.8% FFO/revenue growth vs SCCG's -100.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 187.8% FFO/revenue growth vs SCCG's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (78.4x vs 118.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.3% margin vs GPMT's -30.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs GPMT's 1.44, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs GPMT's 14.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.7% vs GPMT's -19.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.3% ROA vs GPMT's -2.3%, ROIC 0.5% vs 2.6% |
SCCG vs WELL vs VTR vs GPMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SCCG vs WELL vs VTR vs GPMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WELL leads in 2 of 6 categories
GPMT leads 1 • VTR leads 1 • SCCG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — VTR and GPMT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL and SCCG operate at a comparable scale, with $11.6B and $0 in trailing revenue. WELL is the more profitable business, keeping 12.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GPMT's -30.5%. On growth, GPMT holds the edge at +157.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $11.6B | $6.1B | $132M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $22M | $2.8B | $2.3B | -$8M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | $1.4B | $260M | -$40M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | $2.5B | $1.4B | $463,000 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +39.1% | -4.3% | +47.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +4.4% | +13.4% | -4.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +12.3% | +4.2% | -30.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +21.9% | +22.4% | +0.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.1% | +40.3% | +22.0% | +157.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +103.4% | +22.5% | 0.0% | +40.9% |
Valuation Metrics
GPMT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 153.3x trailing earnings, WELL trades at a 74% valuation discount to SCCG's 596.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GPMT's 20.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WELL's 66.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $149.2B | $41.1B | $74M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $165.6B | $53.6B | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 596.75x | 153.25x | 160.26x | -1.34x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 397.83x | 78.42x | 118.01x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 66.40x | 24.31x | 20.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 13.99x | 7.05x | 0.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.40x | 3.35x | 3.18x | 0.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 455.30x | 52.41x | 31.25x | 27.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WELL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WELL delivers a 3.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-7 for GPMT. WELL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GPMT's 2.12x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WELL scores 7/9 vs SCCG's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.0% | +3.5% | +2.1% | -7.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +2.3% | +1.0% | -2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +0.5% | +2.5% | +2.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +0.6% | +3.2% | +4.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.49x | 1.05x | 2.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$11M | $16.3B | $12.5B | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $5.0B | $741M | $66M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $21.4B | $13.2B | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.26x | 1.40x | 0.58x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WELL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WELL five years ago would be worth $30,234 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,472 for GPMT. Over the past 12 months, WELL leads with a +42.7% total return vs GPMT's -19.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WELL at 42.5% vs GPMT's -13.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.6% | +14.3% | +12.6% | -32.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +28.8% | +42.7% | +33.9% | -19.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +36.4% | +189.5% | +94.2% | -34.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.3% | +202.3% | +74.8% | -65.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.3% | +223.1% | +65.0% | -50.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.9% | +42.5% | +24.8% | -13.1% |
Risk & Volatility
VTR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VTR is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GPMT's 1.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VTR currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs GPMT's 49.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.09x | 0.13x | 0.01x | 1.44x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.55 | $219.59 | $88.50 | $3.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.58 | $142.65 | $61.76 | $1.24 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.2% | +97.0% | +97.8% | +49.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.4 | 60.2 | 56.2 | 49.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4K | 2.6M | 3.4M | 154K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WELL and GPMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WELL as "Buy", VTR as "Buy", GPMT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 61.3% upside for GPMT (target: $3) vs 4.9% for VTR (target: $91). For income investors, GPMT offers the higher dividend yield at 13.98% vs SCCG's 0.85%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $226.50 | $90.80 | $2.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 34 | 32 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | +1.3% | +2.1% | +14.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.20 | $2.76 | $1.86 | $0.22 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +7.6% |
WELL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). GPMT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SCCG vs WELL vs VTR vs GPMT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SCCG or WELL or VTR or GPMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.
(GPMT) is the stronger pick with 187. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Sachem Capital Corp. 8. 00% Note (SCCG). Welltower Inc. (WELL) offers the better valuation at 153. 3x trailing P/E (78. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Welltower Inc. (WELL) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SCCG or WELL or VTR or GPMT?
On trailing P/E, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the cheapest at 153. 3x versus Sachem Capital Corp. 8. 00% Note at 596. 8x. On forward P/E, Welltower Inc. is actually cheaper at 78. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SCCG or WELL or VTR or GPMT?
Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) delivered a total return of +202. 3%, compared to -65. 3% for Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. (GPMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WELL returned +223. 1% versus GPMT's -50. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SCCG or WELL or VTR or GPMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ventas, Inc.
(VTR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. 's 1. 44β — meaning GPMT is approximately 15063% more volatile than VTR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Welltower Inc. (WELL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 2% for Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SCCG or WELL or VTR or GPMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.
(GPMT) is pulling ahead at 187. 8% versus -100. 0% for Sachem Capital Corp. 8. 00% Note (SCCG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ventas, Inc. grew EPS 184. 2% year-over-year, compared to -11. 5% for Welltower Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GPMT leads at 22. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SCCG or WELL or VTR or GPMT?
Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 8% net margin versus -28. 3% for Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GPMT leads at 43. 6% versus 0. 0% for SCCG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GPMT leads at 83. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SCCG or WELL or VTR or GPMT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) trades at 78. 4x forward P/E versus 397. 8x for Sachem Capital Corp. 8. 00% Note — 319. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GPMT: 61. 3% to $2. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — SCCG or WELL or VTR or GPMT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. (GPMT) offers the highest yield at 14. 0%, versus 0. 8% for Sachem Capital Corp. 8. 00% Note (SCCG).
09Is SCCG or WELL or VTR or GPMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ventas, Inc.
(VTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 01), 2. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VTR: +65. 0%, GPMT: -50. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SCCG and WELL and VTR and GPMT?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SCCG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; VTR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; GPMT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.