Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SDM vs TIGR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
SDM vs TIGR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $49M | $628M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $22M | $392M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $118M |
| Gross Margin | 13.9% | 65.0% |
| Operating Margin | 9.6% | 35.6% |
| Forward P/E | 28.9x | 6.8x |
| Total Debt | $303K | $180M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $58K | $394M |
SDM vs TIGR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 25 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Smart Digital Group… (SDM) | 100 | 27.2 | -72.8% |
| UP Fintech Holding … (TIGR) | 100 | 96.4 | -3.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SDM vs TIGR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SDM has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 121.8%, EPS growth -14.9%
- Lower volatility, beta -0.40, Low D/E 4.7%, current ratio 1.85x
- Beta -0.40, current ratio 1.85x
TIGR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -39.9% 10Y total return vs SDM's -69.7%
- Lower P/E (6.8x vs 28.9x)
- 15.5% margin vs SDM's 7.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 121.8% revenue growth vs TIGR's 43.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.8x vs 28.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.5% margin vs SDM's 7.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (4.7% vs 27.1%) | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -29.9% vs SDM's -67.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.0% ROA vs TIGR's 1.6%, ROIC 27.0% vs 13.8% |
SDM vs TIGR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SDM vs TIGR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TIGR leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TIGR is the larger business by revenue, generating $392M annually — 18.2x SDM's $22M. TIGR is the more profitable business, keeping 15.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SDM's 7.9%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $22M | $392M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $225M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $118M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $673M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.9% | +65.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.6% | +35.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.9% | +15.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.2% | +2.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +12.4% |
Valuation Metrics
TIGR leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.9x trailing earnings, TIGR trades at a 38% valuation discount to SDM's 28.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TIGR's 2.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SDM's 22.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $49M | $628M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $50M | $414M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 28.91x | 17.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.65x | 2.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.30x | 1.60x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.69x | 1.64x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 0.76x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SDM leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SDM delivers a 30.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $18 for TIGR. SDM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TIGR's 0.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TIGR scores 6/9 vs SDM's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +30.9% | +17.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +14.0% | +1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +27.0% | +13.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +36.0% | +18.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.27x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $245,158 | -$214M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $57,817 | $394M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $302,975 | $180M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 120.96x | 3.26x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TIGR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TIGR five years ago would be worth $3,769 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,028 for SDM. Over the past 12 months, TIGR leads with a -29.9% total return vs SDM's -67.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TIGR at 30.4% vs SDM's -32.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | 0.0% | -38.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -67.8% | -29.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.7% | +121.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.7% | -62.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.7% | -39.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -32.9% | +30.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SDM and TIGR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SDM is the less volatile stock with a -0.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TIGR's 2.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TIGR currently trades 47.5% from its 52-week high vs SDM's 6.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.40x | 2.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.40 | $13.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.50 | $5.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +6.3% | +47.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 28.7 | 52.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 17.2M | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Sell |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $4.73 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TIGR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SDM leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
SDM vs TIGR: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SDM or TIGR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Smart Digital Group Limited Ordinary Shares (SDM) is the stronger pick with 121.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 43. 7% for UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR). UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) offers the better valuation at 17. 9x trailing P/E (6. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) a "Sell" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SDM or TIGR?
On trailing P/E, UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) is the cheapest at 17. 9x versus Smart Digital Group Limited Ordinary Shares at 28. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SDM or TIGR?
Over the past 5 years, UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) delivered a total return of -62. 3%, compared to -69. 7% for Smart Digital Group Limited Ordinary Shares (SDM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TIGR returned -39. 9% versus SDM's -69. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SDM or TIGR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Smart Digital Group Limited Ordinary Shares (SDM) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
40β versus UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A's 2. 02β — meaning TIGR is approximately -604% more volatile than SDM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Smart Digital Group Limited Ordinary Shares (SDM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 27% for UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SDM or TIGR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Smart Digital Group Limited Ordinary Shares (SDM) is pulling ahead at 121.
8% versus 43. 7% for UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A grew EPS 71. 4% year-over-year, compared to -14. 9% for Smart Digital Group Limited Ordinary Shares. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SDM or TIGR?
UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 5% net margin versus 7. 9% for Smart Digital Group Limited Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 15. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TIGR leads at 35. 6% versus 9. 6% for SDM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TIGR leads at 65. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — SDM or TIGR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is SDM or TIGR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Smart Digital Group Limited Ordinary Shares (SDM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
40)). UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) carries a higher beta of 2. 02 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SDM: -69. 7%, TIGR: -39. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SDM and TIGR?
These companies operate in different sectors (SDM (Communication Services) and TIGR (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.