Agricultural Farm Products
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SDOT vs FLXS vs AGRO vs ETH vs VITL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Agricultural Farm Products
Asset Management - Cryptocurrency
Agricultural Farm Products
SDOT vs FLXS vs AGRO vs ETH vs VITL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural Farm Products | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Agricultural Farm Products | Asset Management - Cryptocurrency | Agricultural Farm Products |
| Market Cap | $329K | $299M | $6.77B | $560M | $400M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $247M | $458M | $1.43B | $615M | $784M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-93M | $22M | $-8M | $47M | $48M |
| Gross Margin | -9.2% | 23.2% | 23.4% | 60.5% | 35.2% |
| Operating Margin | -27.4% | 6.1% | 4.4% | 10.1% | 8.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.8x | 6.7x | 8.6x | 12.4x |
| Total Debt | $10M | $59M | $1.95B | $124M | $53M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $653K | $40M | $383M | $76M | $49M |
SDOT vs FLXS vs AGRO vs ETH vs VITL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sadot Group Inc. (SDOT) | 100 | 0.7 | -99.3% |
| Flexsteel Industrie… (FLXS) | 100 | 147.1 | +47.1% |
| Adecoagro S.A. (AGRO) | 100 | 135.9 | +35.9% |
| Grayscale Ethereum … (ETH) | 100 | 71.4 | -28.6% |
| Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) | 100 | 24.5 | -75.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SDOT vs FLXS vs AGRO vs ETH vs VITL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, SDOT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FLXS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.45, yield 1.1%
- 53.0% 10Y total return vs AGRO's 37.6%
- Beta 1.45, yield 1.1%, current ratio 2.78x
- 1.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs AGRO's 0.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
AGRO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (6.7x vs 12.4x)
ETH is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.20 vs VITL's 0.31
- 8.4% margin vs SDOT's -37.8%
VITL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 25.3%, EPS growth 22.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.33, Low D/E 15.2%, current ratio 2.16x
- 25.3% revenue growth vs SDOT's -64.8%
- Beta 0.33 vs ETH's 2.83, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.3% revenue growth vs SDOT's -64.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.7x vs 12.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.4% margin vs SDOT's -37.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.33 vs ETH's 2.83, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs AGRO's 0.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +77.1% vs SDOT's -97.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.0% ROA vs SDOT's -128.7% |
SDOT vs FLXS vs AGRO vs ETH vs VITL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SDOT vs FLXS vs AGRO vs ETH vs VITL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ETH leads in 1 of 6 categories
VITL leads 1 • FLXS leads 1 • SDOT leads 0 • AGRO leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ETH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AGRO is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 5.8x SDOT's $247M. ETH is the more profitable business, keeping 8.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SDOT's -37.8%. On growth, VITL holds the edge at +15.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $247M | $458M | $1.4B | $615M | $784M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$68M | $31M | $335M | $70M | $78M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$93M | $22M | -$8M | $47M | $48M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | $28M | $37M | $20M | -$90M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -9.2% | +23.2% | +23.4% | +60.5% | +35.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -27.4% | +6.1% | +4.4% | +10.1% | +8.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -37.8% | +4.8% | -0.5% | +8.4% | +6.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.0% | +6.1% | +2.6% | +0.0% | -11.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -99.9% | +9.8% | +11.1% | — | +15.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -37.7% | -27.2% | -162.5% | -28.1% | -108.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AGRO and VITL each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.2x trailing earnings, VITL trades at a 61% valuation discount to FLXS's 15.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), VITL offers better value at 0.16x vs ETH's 0.26x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $329,318 | $299M | $6.8B | $560M | $400M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10M | $318M | $8.3B | $607M | $405M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | 15.73x | -800.61x | 10.94x | 6.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.79x | 6.73x | 8.62x | 12.38x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.26x | 0.16x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.50x | 71.40x | 9.79x | 3.94x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 0.68x | 4.92x | 0.91x | 0.53x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.89x | 3.75x | 1.17x | 1.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.85x | 328.52x | 9999.00x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
VITL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VITL delivers a 14.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-10 for SDOT. VITL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AGRO's 1.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLXS scores 8/9 vs VITL's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.7% | +12.2% | -0.5% | +10.0% | +14.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -128.7% | +7.5% | -0.2% | +6.4% | +10.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +9.9% | -2.1% | +7.6% | +26.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +12.3% | -2.3% | +10.5% | +26.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.35x | 1.09x | 0.26x | 0.15x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $10M | $19M | $1.6B | $47M | $5M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $653,000 | $40M | $383M | $76M | $49M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $59M | $1.9B | $124M | $53M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -10.43x | 380.21x | 0.68x | 721.00x | 38.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FLXS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AGRO five years ago would be worth $14,632 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $23 for SDOT. Over the past 12 months, FLXS leads with a +77.1% total return vs SDOT's -97.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FLXS at 51.3% vs SDOT's -86.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -80.9% | +40.4% | +70.8% | -25.4% | -70.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -97.5% | +77.1% | +54.9% | +10.2% | -72.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +246.5% | +66.1% | -32.8% | -41.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +29.5% | +46.3% | -29.7% | -55.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +53.0% | +37.6% | -18.2% | -74.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -86.8% | +51.3% | +18.4% | -12.4% | -16.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FLXS and AGRO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AGRO is the less volatile stock with a -0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ETH's 2.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLXS currently trades 93.1% from its 52-week high vs SDOT's 1.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.75x | 1.45x | -0.13x | 2.83x | 0.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.00 | $59.95 | $15.89 | $45.78 | $53.13 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.24 | $29.38 | $6.89 | $17.07 | $8.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +1.5% | +93.1% | +82.6% | +48.0% | +16.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 21.6 | 60.7 | 48.4 | 51.4 | 28.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 11.1M | 47K | 1.8M | 4.5M | 3.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FLXS and AGRO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AGRO as "Hold", ETH as "Hold", VITL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 178.4% upside for VITL (target: $25) vs -35.3% for AGRO (target: $9). For income investors, FLXS offers the higher dividend yield at 1.12% vs AGRO's 0.52%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $54.00 | $8.50 | — | $24.89 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 8 | 10 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% | +0.5% | +0.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 4 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.63 | $0.07 | $0.00 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% | +0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ETH leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). VITL leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
SDOT vs FLXS vs AGRO vs ETH vs VITL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SDOT or FLXS or AGRO or ETH or VITL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Vital Farms, Inc.
(VITL) is the stronger pick with 25. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -64. 8% for Sadot Group Inc. (SDOT). Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) offers the better valuation at 6. 2x trailing P/E (12. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SDOT or FLXS or AGRO or ETH or VITL?
On trailing P/E, Vital Farms, Inc.
(VITL) is the cheapest at 6. 2x versus Flexsteel Industries, Inc. at 15. 7x. On forward P/E, Adecoagro S. A. is actually cheaper at 6. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust wins at 0. 20x versus Vital Farms, Inc. 's 0. 31x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SDOT or FLXS or AGRO or ETH or VITL?
Over the past 5 years, Adecoagro S.
A. (AGRO) delivered a total return of +46. 3%, compared to -99. 8% for Sadot Group Inc. (SDOT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FLXS returned +53. 0% versus SDOT's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SDOT or FLXS or AGRO or ETH or VITL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Adecoagro S.
A. (AGRO) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 13β versus Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust's 2. 83β — meaning ETH is approximately -2242% more volatile than AGRO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 109% for Adecoagro S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SDOT or FLXS or AGRO or ETH or VITL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Vital Farms, Inc.
(VITL) is pulling ahead at 25. 3% versus -64. 8% for Sadot Group Inc. (SDOT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flexsteel Industries, Inc. grew EPS 85. 9% year-over-year, compared to -1423. 8% for Sadot Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VITL leads at 28. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SDOT or FLXS or AGRO or ETH or VITL?
Vital Farms, Inc.
(VITL) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 7% net margin versus -37. 8% for Sadot Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VITL leads at 11. 6% versus -16. 4% for SDOT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ETH leads at 60. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SDOT or FLXS or AGRO or ETH or VITL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 20x versus Vital Farms, Inc. 's 0. 31x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Adecoagro S. A. (AGRO) trades at 6. 7x forward P/E versus 12. 4x for Vital Farms, Inc. — 5. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VITL: 178. 4% to $24. 89.
08Which pays a better dividend — SDOT or FLXS or AGRO or ETH or VITL?
In this comparison, FLXS (1.
1% yield), AGRO (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. SDOT, ETH, VITL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SDOT or FLXS or AGRO or ETH or VITL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Adecoagro S.
A. (AGRO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 13), 0. 5% yield). Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) carries a higher beta of 2. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AGRO: +37. 6%, ETH: -18. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SDOT and FLXS and AGRO and ETH and VITL?
These companies operate in different sectors (SDOT (Consumer Defensive) and FLXS (Consumer Cyclical) and AGRO (Consumer Defensive) and ETH (Financial Services) and VITL (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SDOT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLXS is a small-cap deep-value stock; AGRO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ETH is a small-cap deep-value stock; VITL is a small-cap high-growth stock. FLXS, AGRO pay a dividend while SDOT, ETH, VITL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.