Solar
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SEDG vs XOM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Integrated
SEDG vs XOM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Solar | Oil & Gas Integrated |
| Market Cap | $2.47B | $629.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.28B | $323.90B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-364M | $28.84B |
| Gross Margin | 18.2% | 21.7% |
| Operating Margin | -18.6% | 10.5% |
| Forward P/E | 642.6x | 15.0x |
| Total Debt | $423M | $43.54B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $540M | $10.68B |
SEDG vs XOM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SolarEdge Technolog… (SEDG) | 100 | 28.6 | -71.4% |
| Exxon Mobil Corpora… (XOM) | 100 | 326.7 | +226.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SEDG vs XOM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SEDG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 31.4%, EPS growth 78.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -27.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.03, Low D/E 99.1%, current ratio 2.17x
- Beta 2.03, current ratio 2.17x
XOM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 107.4% 10Y total return vs SEDG's 82.2%
- Lower P/E (15.0x vs 642.6x)
- 8.9% margin vs SEDG's -28.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 31.4% revenue growth vs XOM's -4.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.0x vs 642.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.9% margin vs SEDG's -28.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (16.3% vs 99.1%) | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield; 26-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +182.6% vs XOM's +45.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs SEDG's -19.8%, ROIC 8.6% vs -29.5% |
SEDG vs XOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SEDG vs XOM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XOM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $323.9B annually — 254.0x SEDG's $1.3B. XOM is the more profitable business, keeping 8.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SEDG's -28.6%. On growth, SEDG holds the edge at +41.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $323.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$225M | $59.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$364M | $28.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $78M | $23.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.2% | +21.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -18.6% | +10.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -28.6% | +8.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | +7.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +41.5% | -1.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | -11.0% |
Valuation Metrics
XOM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.5B | $629.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.4B | $662.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.89x | 22.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 642.56x | 15.00x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.05x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.09x | 1.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.68x | 2.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 30.57x | 26.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
XOM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
XOM delivers a 10.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-80 for SEDG. XOM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SEDG's 0.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SEDG scores 7/9 vs XOM's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -79.6% | +10.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -19.8% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -29.5% | +8.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -19.2% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.99x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$116M | $32.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $540M | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $423M | $43.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.12x | 69.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
XOM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in XOM five years ago would be worth $27,178 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,897 for SEDG. Over the past 12 months, SEDG leads with a +182.6% total return vs XOM's +45.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XOM at 13.7% vs SEDG's -48.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +29.5% | +22.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +182.6% | +45.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.1% | +46.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.0% | +171.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +82.2% | +107.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -48.2% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
XOM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XOM is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SEDG's 2.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. XOM currently trades 84.2% from its 52-week high vs SEDG's 75.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.03x | -0.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $53.75 | $176.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.73 | $101.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.6% | +84.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.8 | 53.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.6M | 18.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SEDG as "Hold" and XOM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 8.0% upside for XOM (target: $160) vs -13.6% for SEDG (target: $35). XOM is the only dividend payer here at 2.69% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $35.09 | $160.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 48 | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 26 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $4.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.2% |
XOM leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics.
SEDG vs XOM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SEDG or XOM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
(SEDG) is the stronger pick with 31. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 5% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) offers the better valuation at 22. 2x trailing P/E (15. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. (SEDG) a "Hold" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SEDG or XOM?
On forward P/E, Exxon Mobil Corporation is actually cheaper at 15.
0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SEDG or XOM?
Over the past 5 years, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) delivered a total return of +171.
8%, compared to -81. 0% for SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. (SEDG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XOM returned +107. 4% versus SEDG's +82. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SEDG or XOM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
15β versus SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 03β — meaning SEDG is approximately -1492% more volatile than XOM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 99% for SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SEDG or XOM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
(SEDG) is pulling ahead at 31. 4% versus -4. 5% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 78. 2% year-over-year, compared to -14. 5% for Exxon Mobil Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, XOM leads at -6. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SEDG or XOM?
Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the more profitable company, earning 8.
9% net margin versus -34. 2% for SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: XOM leads at 10. 5% versus -24. 1% for SEDG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — XOM leads at 21. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SEDG or XOM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) trades at 15.
0x forward P/E versus 642. 6x for SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. — 627. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for XOM: 8. 0% to $160. 43.
08Which pays a better dividend — SEDG or XOM?
In this comparison, XOM (2.
7% yield) pays a dividend. SEDG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SEDG or XOM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
15), 2. 7% yield, +107. 4% 10Y return). SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. (SEDG) carries a higher beta of 2. 03 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (XOM: +107. 4%, SEDG: +82. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SEDG and XOM?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SEDG is a small-cap high-growth stock; XOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock. XOM pays a dividend while SEDG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.