Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SEG vs RCL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Travel Services
SEG vs RCL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | Travel Services |
| Market Cap | $287M | $71.41B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $130M | $18.39B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-117M | $4.48B |
| Gross Margin | -23.1% | 47.2% |
| Operating Margin | -55.9% | 27.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 15.4x |
| Total Debt | $156M | $22.64B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $78M | $825M |
SEG vs RCL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seaport Entertainme… (SEG) | 100 | 71.2 | -28.8% |
| Royal Caribbean Cru… (RCL) | 100 | 168.4 | +68.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SEG vs RCL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SEG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.24
- Rev growth 17.3%, EPS growth 45.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.24, Low D/E 33.5%, current ratio 1.50x
RCL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 270.0% 10Y total return vs SEG's -25.0%
- 24.4% margin vs SEG's -89.5%
- 0.4% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.3% FFO/revenue growth vs RCL's 8.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.4% margin vs SEG's -89.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.24 vs RCL's 1.69, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +17.3% vs SEG's +14.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.1% ROA vs SEG's -16.8%, ROIC 12.2% vs -9.9% |
SEG vs RCL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SEG vs RCL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RCL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RCL is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.4B annually — 141.0x SEG's $130M. RCL is the more profitable business, keeping 24.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SEG's -89.5%. On growth, SEG holds the edge at +29.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $130M | $18.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$41M | $6.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$117M | $4.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$71M | $1.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -23.1% | +47.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -55.9% | +27.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -89.5% | +24.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -54.3% | +7.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.1% | +11.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.1% | +28.9% |
Valuation Metrics
SEG leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $287M | $71.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $365M | $93.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.44x | 16.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.44x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 14.29x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.20x | 3.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.61x | 7.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 57.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RCL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RCL delivers a 44.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $45 in annual profit, vs $-23 for SEG. SEG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.33x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RCL's 2.21x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RCL scores 7/9 vs SEG's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -23.0% | +44.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -16.8% | +11.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.9% | +12.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -11.1% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.33x | 2.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$21M | $21.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $78M | $825M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $156M | $22.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -159.93x | 5.36x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RCL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RCL five years ago would be worth $32,522 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,503 for SEG. Over the past 12 months, RCL leads with a +17.3% total return vs SEG's +14.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RCL at 52.8% vs SEG's -9.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.1% | -6.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +14.3% | +17.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.0% | +257.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.0% | +225.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.0% | +270.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -9.1% | +52.8% |
Risk & Volatility
SEG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SEG is the less volatile stock with a 1.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCL's 1.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SEG currently trades 79.2% from its 52-week high vs RCL's 72.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.24x | 1.69x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.34 | $366.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.28 | $223.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.2% | +72.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.2 | 43.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 60K | 2.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SEG as "Buy" and RCL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 34.0% upside for RCL (target: $354) vs 22.5% for SEG (target: $28). RCL is the only dividend payer here at 0.37% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.50 | $353.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 51 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.97 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.6% |
RCL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SEG leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
SEG vs RCL: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SEG or RCL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Seaport Entertainment Group Inc.
(SEG) is the stronger pick with 17. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 8% for Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (RCL). Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (RCL) offers the better valuation at 16. 9x trailing P/E (15. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Seaport Entertainment Group Inc. (SEG) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SEG or RCL?
Over the past 5 years, Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
(RCL) delivered a total return of +225. 2%, compared to -25. 0% for Seaport Entertainment Group Inc. (SEG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RCL returned +270. 0% versus SEG's -25. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SEG or RCL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Seaport Entertainment Group Inc.
(SEG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 24β versus Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. 's 1. 69β — meaning RCL is approximately 36% more volatile than SEG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Seaport Entertainment Group Inc. (SEG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 33% versus 2% for Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SEG or RCL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Seaport Entertainment Group Inc.
(SEG) is pulling ahead at 17. 3% versus 8. 8% for Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (RCL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Seaport Entertainment Group Inc. grew EPS 45. 4% year-over-year, compared to 42. 7% for Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCL leads at 26. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SEG or RCL?
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
(RCL) is the more profitable company, earning 23. 8% net margin versus -89. 5% for Seaport Entertainment Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RCL leads at 27. 4% versus -55. 9% for SEG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCL leads at 46. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is SEG or RCL more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RCL: 34.
0% to $353. 67.
07Which pays a better dividend — SEG or RCL?
In this comparison, RCL (0.
4% yield) pays a dividend. SEG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is SEG or RCL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Seaport Entertainment Group Inc.
(SEG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 24)). Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (RCL) carries a higher beta of 1. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SEG: -25. 0%, RCL: +270. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SEG and RCL?
These companies operate in different sectors (SEG (Real Estate) and RCL (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SEG is a small-cap high-growth stock; RCL is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.