Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SEPN vs ACLX vs KYMR vs IMVT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
SEPN vs ACLX vs KYMR vs IMVT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1.07B | $6.73B | $6.91B | $5.53B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $46M | $22M | $51M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-49M | $-229M | $-315M | $-464M |
| Gross Margin | — | -64.8% | 33.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | -148.6% | -11.4% | -7.0% | — |
| Total Debt | $24M | $96M | $82M | $98K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $121M | $80M | $357M | $714M |
SEPN vs ACLX vs KYMR vs IMVT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Septerna, Inc. (SEPN) | 100 | 104.8 | +4.8% |
| Arcellx, Inc. (ACLX) | 100 | 136.3 | +36.3% |
| Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR) | 100 | 183.3 | +83.3% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 93.0 | -7.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SEPN vs ACLX vs KYMR vs IMVT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SEPN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 41.7%, EPS growth 84.8%
- 41.7% revenue growth vs ACLX's -79.4%
- +240.1% vs IMVT's +96.1%
- -9.5% ROA vs IMVT's -44.1%
ACLX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 5.8% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 173.6%
KYMR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 1.15
- Lower volatility, beta 1.15, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 10.47x
- Beta 1.15, current ratio 10.47x
- Beta 1.15 vs IMVT's 1.37
IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 3.2% margin vs ACLX's -10.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 41.7% revenue growth vs ACLX's -79.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs ACLX's -10.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.15 vs IMVT's 1.37 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +240.1% vs IMVT's +96.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -9.5% ROA vs IMVT's -44.1% |
SEPN vs ACLX vs KYMR vs IMVT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SEPN leads in 3 of 6 categories
ACLX leads 2 • KYMR leads 0 • IMVT leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SEPN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KYMR and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $51M and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -106.4% (SEPN) to -10.3% (ACLX). On growth, SEPN holds the edge at +112.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $46M | $22M | $51M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$68M | -$246M | -$352M | -$487M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$49M | -$229M | -$315M | -$464M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $110M | -$213M | -$244M | -$423M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | -64.8% | +33.2% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -148.6% | -11.4% | -7.0% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -106.4% | -10.3% | -6.1% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.4% | -9.5% | -4.7% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +112.8% | -89.2% | +55.5% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +64.1% | -13.6% | +13.4% | +19.7% |
Valuation Metrics
SEPN leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $6.7B | $6.9B | $5.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $977M | $6.7B | $6.6B | $4.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -21.80x | -28.27x | -22.93x | -9.97x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 23.38x | 302.09x | 176.26x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.78x | 16.10x | 4.52x | 5.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.80x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SEPN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SEPN delivers a -12.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-13 in annual profit, vs $-55 for ACLX. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ACLX's 0.24x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SEPN scores 5/9 vs ACLX's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.6% | -55.4% | -25.0% | -47.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.5% | -36.2% | -22.3% | -44.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -20.8% | -46.2% | -24.9% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -14.3% | -46.6% | -27.2% | -66.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.24x | 0.05x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$97M | $16M | -$275M | -$714M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $121M | $80M | $357M | $714M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $24M | $96M | $82M | $98,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -8.45x | -2119.53x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ACLX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACLX five years ago would be worth $68,494 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,206 for SEPN. Over the past 12 months, SEPN leads with a +240.1% total return vs IMVT's +96.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KYMR at 45.0% vs SEPN's 3.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.3% | +81.7% | +16.3% | +5.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +240.1% | +117.4% | +190.7% | +96.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.1% | +166.2% | +205.1% | +40.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.1% | +584.9% | +92.1% | +62.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.1% | +584.9% | +154.4% | +173.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.9% | +38.6% | +45.0% | +12.1% |
Risk & Volatility
ACLX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACLX is the less volatile stock with a -0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMVT's 1.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACLX currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs SEPN's 73.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.37x | -0.34x | 1.15x | 1.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.63 | $115.13 | $103.00 | $30.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.44 | $47.86 | $28.06 | $13.36 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.5% | +99.9% | +82.2% | +90.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.1 | 79.9 | 54.1 | 60.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 303K | 1.6M | 602K | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SEPN as "Buy", ACLX as "Hold", KYMR as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 67.2% upside for IMVT (target: $46) vs -2.3% for ACLX (target: $112).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $39.00 | $112.45 | $117.06 | $45.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 18 | 26 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SEPN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ACLX leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
SEPN vs ACLX vs KYMR vs IMVT: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SEPN or ACLX or KYMR or IMVT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Septerna, Inc.
(SEPN) is the stronger pick with 41. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -79. 4% for Arcellx, Inc. (ACLX). Analysts rate Septerna, Inc. (SEPN) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SEPN or ACLX or KYMR or IMVT?
Over the past 5 years, Arcellx, Inc.
(ACLX) delivered a total return of +584. 9%, compared to +12. 1% for Septerna, Inc. (SEPN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACLX returned +584. 9% versus SEPN's +12. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SEPN or ACLX or KYMR or IMVT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Arcellx, Inc.
(ACLX) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 34β versus Immunovant, Inc. 's 1. 37β — meaning IMVT is approximately -506% more volatile than ACLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 24% for Arcellx, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SEPN or ACLX or KYMR or IMVT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Septerna, Inc.
(SEPN) is pulling ahead at 41. 7% versus -79. 4% for Arcellx, Inc. (ACLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Septerna, Inc. grew EPS 84. 8% year-over-year, compared to -103. 5% for Arcellx, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SEPN or ACLX or KYMR or IMVT?
Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -1027. 3% for Arcellx, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IMVT leads at 0. 0% versus -1135. 6% for ACLX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KYMR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SEPN or ACLX or KYMR or IMVT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is SEPN or ACLX or KYMR or IMVT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Arcellx, Inc.
(ACLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 34), +584. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACLX: +584. 9%, SEPN: +12. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SEPN and ACLX and KYMR and IMVT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SEPN is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACLX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.